BrizzyBlue wrote:
IN:....Scotland....Betts.....Bentick....Bryan.....McGrath
OUT:.Chambers..Davies...Johnson...Deluca...Bowyer
I'll deal with the outs first.
Chambers: I have been disappointed with his form so far, especially given his contribution during the Wizzer Cup. Is he just not match fit, or is there something else up? As much as I'd like him in the side, maybe a solid game with the Ants might be the tonic he needs.
Davies: Hmm, tricky one I think. He's got a touch of the Fraser Brown about him in that he's tough and has a bit of mongrel. I'd be happy to persist with him in the seniors.
Johnson: As noted, he is so good around the clearances can we actually afford to leave him out? Okay, his skills aren't silky smooth, but he has plenty of friends in that department unfortunately. But, hopefully with Scotland back in the side Johnno has a pretty good ball user to dish off to, along with the likes of Campo, Stevens, Lappin, Houla and Kouta who can all use the ball pretty well from the middle.
Deluca: No way! He has to stay in the side, either as a forward option if Fevola misses or simply to give us some height aruond the ground. One thing is certain, Spider Everitt couls take us to the cleaners this game, his athleticism will be too good for any of our ruckmen.
Bowyer: Gee, could be a tough call on Glenn. He probably has done enough to stay in the side, but Betts and Scotland are likely to be in the side I reckon and someone has to make way. I would like to see Bowyer in against his old side, but I'm not sure it will happen.
Now, to the ins...
Scotland: Yes.
Betts: Given his form for the Bullants he'd have to be in I'd say. He needs to get front and square to those packs and hit the ball running. He has the finishing skills and the pace, he just needs to give himself the opportunities. And his tenacity when he doesn't have the ball is usually pretty good too.
Bentick: I'd like to see him get a run, but as with the next few blokes have they done enough to warrant promotion, or conversely, are the places for them in our 22? I guess at some stage these guys on the fringes deserve a chance to prove themselves and Bentick would hardly embarass himself in the seniors. Not sure he'll get a run this week though.
Bryan: Can someone answer ponkstar's questions please, because I'd like to know the same. He may be tall, but at this stage, is he ready?
McGrath: I like Cory, he has a bit of dash about him, goes pretty hard and could be a very handy back pocket, or HBF for us. Again, it may be a case of no places for him in the 22. But he'll get more chances during the year, I have no doubt.
While it is safe to say we're a long way from having the best squad in the league, it is pleasing to see our guys must be creating some real selection headaches for Pagan and co. As with 2004 our list is still in a work in progress and some of the guys battling for places won't be on our list in 2006, that's football. We need to remain patient while demanding maximum effort from every one of the 22 blokes that reprsesent our club each week.
The way I see it our biggest deficiency this year has been our ball use. Shit delivery into the forward 50 and silly turnovers have cost us dearly. If we can remedy these short falls on a consistent basis I think we'll be alright and continue to show real signs of improvement.
For 2006 we need talls (still!) and some quality ball users recruited by the club.