These articles are spot on.
AFL industry clueless on coaching - Jake Niall
Jake Niall wrote:
John Buchanan didn't play Test cricket. He wasn't even close. Bart Cummings didn't ride a Melbourne Cup winner. Don Talbot and Charlie Walsh, worldbeating coaches in swimming and cycling, didn't swim or ride with great distinction. Yet, in the AFL, there is an illogical view that one's playing ability is relevant to coaching prowess, when there is no evidence of a link
Jake Niall wrote:
There is an unspoken assumption that a superior footballer, with alpha male tendencies (Voss, Buckley), needs less of an apprenticeship than a player of more modest ability.
Again, this is ridiculous. One of these years, a club will disregard footy culture and hire someone with zero profile who can really coach, and it will steal a march on the clubs that are still wallowing in "profile."
"Footy culture", as a sage official once said, is an excuse for not pursuing excellence.
Inexperience the hurdle for Voss - Greg BaumGreg Baum wrote:
Voss wants to coach, and will. But there is a compelling reason why it ought not to be next year, and it has nothing to do with a pub brawl. Coaching now is not simply a matter of instruction and exhortation. It is a learned craft, demanding management skills as well as an inspirational touch. Even the greatest players need to study to succeed at it.
A staple of every season is the story of the injured player who sits in the coach's box for a game and emerges with a bewildered look to say that he had no idea of what the job entailed.
Greats in all fields defy orthodoxy, but professionalism slowly is giving lie to that notion. Apart from the veterans, all current AFL coaches have done their indentures. Voss was an incomparable footballer, but that does not make him a readymade coach.