blueman wrote:
Rest assured Pagan will either come good or he will be sacked, there is no middle ground any more. He would be well aware of this.
This very much depends on what your criteria for 'good' is. Carlton as a club have committed to development based on a youth policy (this is in as far as we can believe our board). Pagan however may see his survival contingent on wins. The two are not necessarily the same eg we could have a Clayton's year as in 2004; the coach will go after more last chance charlies like Gardiner; etc.
Development for me is developing a sound, modern and flexible game strategy - importantly one the team can believe in. It means better game day tactics and team structures. It means modern approaches to fitness and injury management. It means a stable group of innovative assistants who have faith in the coach with the coach returning such faith (by listening to them).
Our youth policy should be based on a horses-for-courses basis - ie not wild race to promote players merely because they are young but on the actuality that players develop at different rates, have different needs and are promoted on form. However, once promoted, they should be part of the team and its on-field rotations - not mere spectators.
This needs a development coach who is given time. Pagan has had 4 years without any perceivable team development results. Now he seems little more than a lame duck coach who no longer has the benefits of time and who lacks support across the club. His focus then, naturally, will be on his own neck.
The club needs to outline what 'good' is. What criteria must Pagan be beholding to.
IMO we have missed a window of opportunity (actually we slammed it shut on ourselves) to re-define where we are heading. With the new picks etc we should be now promoting a brave new Carlton not wallowing in the uncertainty of being neither arse nor elbow.