Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 11:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Pagan and cashflow
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
If I was the club, I would be approaching Denis and asking him to take a pay cut. To make it realistic I'd offer a similar deal to the one that was offered to Kouta a few years back.

Take Denis' remaining two years, and pay him the same amount over a three year contract.

Benefits:
1) it would reduce expenses in 2007 and 2008 and improve our cashflow by around $200k per year (based on media estimates of his contract)
2) it gives the club access to him at the reduce rate in 2009
3) the dollar value of the contract hasn't changed, so if we end up paying him out by the end of 2008 nothing has changed in dollar terms

The only weakness I can see in this scenario is if Denis made it to the end of 2008 and we wanted to get rid of him, then we'd have to find the money to pay out the 2009 contract. But, under the current terms we'd have already spent that money, so there would be no net loss, only the risk that we still weren't viable enough to pay it out.

I thought this might provide Denis the incentive of another year to turn things around, help our cashflow a little over the next two years and not financially hurt the club if we had to pay him out. It's unlikely that Denis will get a good offer at the end of his current Carlton contract, so it may be of interest to him.

Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pagan and cashflow
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:19 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
steve wrote:
If I was the club, I would be approaching Denis and asking him to take a pay cut. To make it realistic I'd offer a similar deal to the one that was offered to Kouta a few years back.

Take Denis' remaining two years, and pay him the same amount over a three year contract.

Benefits:
1) it would reduce expenses in 2007 and 2008 and improve our cashflow by around $200k per year (based on media estimates of his contract)
2) it gives the club access to him at the reduce rate in 2009
3) the dollar value of the contract hasn't changed, so if we end up paying him out by the end of 2008 nothing has changed in dollar terms

The only weakness I can see in this scenario is if Denis made it to the end of 2008 and we wanted to get rid of him, then we'd have to find the money to pay out the 2009 contract. But, under the current terms we'd have already spent that money, so there would be no net loss, only the risk that we still weren't viable enough to pay it out.

I thought this might provide Denis the incentive of another year to turn things around, help our cashflow a little over the next two years and not financially hurt the club if we had to pay him out. It's unlikely that Denis will get a good offer at the end of his current Carlton contract, so it may be of interest to him.

Thoughts?


Dont think I could stand pagan being around in 2009. I've no doubt we will be better in 2009 but that would be just through sheer accumulation of early picks - not good coaching.

I think I'd take the 200k p.a cash hit and have him out the door asap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
The beauty of that solution though is that we would be no worse off to get rid of him for 2009, if that was what the club wanted


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21589
Location: North of the border
Steve pull your head in we dont want him around one second longer than he has to .

and why would he take a pay cut .

Can you imagine Denis in the real world

Denis the Car Salesman

This supposed gun salesman you hired 4 years ago he has only sold 2 cars this year whats going on

Or yeah back in 96 and 99 he was the top salesman in the country

I dont care what he did back then go ask him why he is not selling


He just said give me good cars and I will sell them for you


Denis the Lawyer

Whats going on with this gun lawyer you hired he has only won 20 of his last 80 odd cases and almost 50 of them they have got life .I thought he was supposed to be good

Yeh but back in 96 and 99 he was the best lawyer in the land


I dont care what he did back then go ask him whats going on

He just said all the good crims have gone to another firm give him good crims and he win cases for you.


Denis the teacher

Denis why have only 20 of your past 80 odd students passed there exams

Give me good students and I show passes . What about Fev his marks are sensational

But Denis they are all failing whats going on



Think about it Steve - Extend his contract ??????????????????????

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:45 pm 
Offline
*previously banned user*

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:37 pm
Posts: 113
Sydney Blue wrote:
Steve pull your head in we dont want him around one second longer than he has to .

and why would he take a pay cut .

Can you imagine Denis in the real world

Denis the Car Salesman

This supposed gun salesman you hired 4 years ago he has only sold 2 cars this year whats going on

Or yeah back in 96 and 99 he was the top salesman in the country

I dont care what he did back then go ask him why he is not selling


He just said give me good cars and I will sell them for you


Denis the Lawyer

Whats going on with this gun lawyer you hired he has only won 20 of his last 80 odd cases and almost 50 of them they have got life .I thought he was supposed to be good

Yeh but back in 96 and 99 he was the best lawyer in the land


I dont care what he did back then go ask him whats going on

He just said all the good crims have gone to another firm give him good crims and he win cases for you.


Denis the teacher

Denis why have only 20 of your past 80 odd students passed there exams

Give me good students and I show passes . What about Fev his marks are sensational

But Denis they are all failing whats going on



Think about it Steve - Extend his contract ??????????????????????


what if the cars aren't any good, ignition faulty, broken windows, can't move, what if the people he has been defending as a lawyer were all caught murdering on video, or there is hard evidence against them, what if the students are just plain stupid?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Shotmov what if the students were good in 2004 and for some unknown reason they have gone backwards since then? What if all of the schools previous sucessful students don't want to go near the place while he is teaching?

WHAT IF HE LOOKS LIKE A FAT FU$%ING PENGUIN EVERYTIME HE WADDLES OUT ON THE GROUND WITH BLOODY TROUT THE SILENT ASSASIN???????

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
While I understand your thinking Steve, I think I lot of people will be happy come the end of Season 2008 and the end of DP's contract.

That's assuming of course that we don't re-sign him to a new deal!































Don't laugh/cry/drop dead from the shock of it all - stranger things have been known to happen down at MC Hammer Park.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Sydney Blue,

If it helps, think of it as a simple restructuring of Pagan's commercial terms. That we pay him $200K less in 2007, $200K less during the season in 2008 and then pay him out if we decide to.

Essentially it helps us with cashflow until we earn enough to pay out his constract. If he performs well enough until the end of 2008, we have the option of 2009.

I suggested this because in our current situation there is no way we'll get rid of him before 2008 anyway, because of our finances and with the AFL looking over our shoulder.

And while I think Denis would probably reject it, his options are going to be greatly reduced for 2009. He might just accept such as proposition as the best chance he has of coaching 2009 and proving that it's been our crap list and not his coaching, that has caused the results of the past four years.

I'm not in Pagan's camp, so son't see my post as an endorsement, but see it as an option to help us commercially over the next two years with no downside, if we want to terminate at the end of 2008 it costs us nothing over the current arrangement.

I'm just trying to think outside the square a little given our current restrictions financially.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:43 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
steve wrote:
I'm not in Pagan's camp, so son't see my post as an endorsement, but see it as an option to help us commercially over the next two years with no downside, if we want to terminate at the end of 2008 it costs us nothing over the current arrangement.

I'm just trying to think outside the square a little given our current restrictions financially.


Whilst I understand your reasons, I think the downside is that it is a lot harder to sack a coach with 2 years to go rather than 1 year to go


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Agreed, but we won't be able to sack him at the end of 2007 anyway, as we won't be able to afford it and will still have the AFL loan and hence the AFL looking over our shoulder


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Sydney Blue wrote:
Steve pull your head in we dont want him around one second longer than he has to........and why would he take a pay cut .

Can you imagine Denis in the real world

Denis the Car Salesman

This supposed gun salesman you hired 4 years ago he has only sold 2 cars this year whats going on

Or yeah back in 96 and 99 he was the top salesman in the country

I dont care what he did back then go ask him why he is not selling

He just said give me good cars and I will sell them for you................


yeah but if you keep looking into the rear view mirror you are going to hit the car in front of you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21589
Location: North of the border
Steve from what have read in the papers the last few months we are financially better off now than we were when we signed Pagan almost 16 months ago on and extended contract . Pagan knows that and he would have known that when he signed the last contract . He will no way known take a cut to extend his contract by one extra year . Kouta in someways done the honouralbe thing and extended his contract to both ensure he played longer than he would have and to help the club.(mind you he was on a pretty penny to begin with)

Pagan is not Kouta with Pagan its all about Pagan and no one else. He coaches for himself and this is obvious by team selections and his history at Carlton. He went half cocked in the preseason trying to event a gameplan that would avoid beltings and with the aid of the draft and a refinement to that gameplan we will improve next year . He will peak the side for the first 6 or so games and maybe the Nab Cup and then go hell for leather at Sticks and Smorgan to get that contract extended .

Will they buy it this time . you bet your arse they will 'they will be climbing over themselves to sign him again . I just hope Fitzy brings them to their senses .

See what most people tend to forget is the reason you hire a coach like Pagan and pay the dollars you do is that they are supposed to be better than other coaches they are supposed to bring the best out of the playing group . Pagan hasn't and doesn't look like doing it any time soon . We have hired what we thought was a Super Coach and ended up with a Grant Thomas . The side will improve through sheer weight of draft picks ala St kilda . But thats not the reason Pagan was hired for he was Hired to get us there quicker and it must be obvious now even to the most ardent Pagan supporter that this is not happening .

He should be tapped on the shoulder now - paid out and someone newer brought in . This could see a total turn around in the clubs on field performance thus negating the effects of having to pay Pagan out by the interest in the fans . Because lets face it we have been crap for 5 years now its getting a bit tiresome and even the diehard fans are struggling to show interest

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Sydney Blue wrote:
Steve from what have read in the papers the last few months we are financially better off now than we were when we signed Pagan almost 16 months ago on and extended contract . Pagan knows that and he would have known that when he signed the last contract . He will no way known take a cut to extend his contract by one extra year . Kouta in someways done the honouralbe thing and extended his contract to both ensure he played longer than he would have and to help the club.(mind you he was on a pretty penny to begin with) - fact or opinion?

'Pagan is not Kouta with Pagan its all about Pagan and no one else.' - fact or opinion? And does this imply Kouita is not about himself and is about everyone else? - or maybe both are people, both think about others and themselves? And is it worse to pay too much for a coach (no salary cap influence) or a player (with salary cap influencs)?

'He coaches for himself and this is obvious by team selections and his history at Carlton.' - or he is coaching for the club and does not give a distant fart for your opinions, not swayed by popularity but by what he thinks is right. Which is it? you and I will never know. Denis appears adamant that you should not just bring the kids in and play them
but rather develop them. So disagree with his development plans but don't pretend he has no plan.

'He went half cocked' - half-cocked? Based on what?

'in the preseason trying to event a gameplan that would avoid beltings and with the aid of the draft and a refinement to that gameplan we will improve next year . He will peak the side for the first 6 or so games and maybe the Nab Cup (are you implying here Pagan got the boys up for the NAB cup only to get a contract extension?) and then go hell for leather at Sticks and Smorgan to get that contract extended .' or the team is improving along the lines he/ the club expects.

'Will they buy it this time . you bet your arse they will 'they will be climbing over themselves to sign him again . I just hope Fitzy brings them to their senses .' so if they do, Fitzy failed, if they don't Fitzy was the reason. Nothing to do with anyone else? Gee you have great knoweldge of the workings of this club.

'See what most people tend to forget' -think no one has forgotten this, no one, but it makes you sound as if you know what you are talking about, as if you are tlaking facts raher than an opinion.

'is the reason you hire a coach like Pagan and pay the dollars you do is that they are supposed to be better than other coaches they are supposed to bring the best out of the playing group . Pagan hasn't and doesn't look like doing it any time soon . We have hired what we thought was a Super Coach and ended up with a Grant Thomas . The side will improve through sheer weight of draft picks ala St kilda . But thats not the reason Pagan was hired for he was Hired to get us there quicker' - quicker than what? What was seen as a quick time frame? Ten years? Seven years? And are you talking here about when he was first hired (to save JE's arse) or resigned?

'and it must be obvious now even to the most ardent Pagan supporter that this is not happening .' depends on that time frame I'd suggest. I keep remembering Wallsy saying 7 to 10 years before we are competitive again and whenever I get frustrated (often I admit these last 3 years) I remember that its 2 to go for the bottom end of his prediction!

'He should be tapped on the shoulder now - paid out and someone newer brought in . This could see a total turn around in the clubs on field performance thus negating the effects of having to pay Pagan out by the interest in the fans . Because lets face it we have been crap for 5 years now its getting a bit tiresome and even the diehard fans are struggling to show interest
' he could be tapped and we could bring someone knew in and if we do not improve, or worse, we improve for a year and then fall back again, or two years and fall back again because the new coach makes decision based on short term fixes and suddenly a ten year term of shite becomes a fifteen, a twenty, a relocation plan?

I have no problems with questioning his tactics, his selections etc. I get frustrated sometimes because I want the kids to play, because we kick in worse than other treams according to my (limited) observations but I try and remember that in reality I know nothing about the team, about nurturing footballers, about strucures etc. So while I might become frustrated i try to keep it in perspective. I am a supporter with little real information.

Pagan is undoubtably making mistakes and in the end I expect the club to weigh up those mistakes against his success and make a decisioon. In no way do I think he is evil, out to destroy the club or any other scenario. He is a man coaching a team.

This site is becoming a lynch mob - no logic, no reasoning, just a need to find a scapegoat and hang them from the nearest tree.

We must look at the coach and evaluate his efforts

We must also use reason not hatred or bias.

We should try and remember we do not know what is happening only what we think is happening.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21589
Location: North of the border
Nice response Danny and your points are noted.

I for one minute dont think it is delibrate either - just incompotence

Posters for several years now have suggested the likes of Beaumont - Allen - Murphy - Beasy- Hulme - Franchinna - McCormick - Ratten - Campo - Mckernan delibrately set about to undermine Pagan . That in recent times Kouta has stop trying and has lost faith in the club and should retire early so the club could move on . All these guys were supposed to be working against Pagan and therefore against the club none of which I dont believe for one minute.

So if its alright for Pagan to remove these players from the club at his whim and replace them with a bunch of mish mash and then not follow it up with the results on field then he is fair game to me and will continue to be fair game until such time that we see some sought of progress and fair progress to not just natural progress that occurs with age and experience - progress like Craig has made at Adelaide

With the exception of Maybe Mccormick and Beasy all those bloke could have retired by now all of them past on their experiences wearing the Navy blue to the next generation of players moving forward but no they have appeared to be driven from the club for not adopting a gameplan which was thrown out at the start of the year . And what has it acheived

Pagan got it wrong and got it wrong big time and now we the supporters are paying for it and becoming a lynch mob as you suggest .

The idea of changing a coach setting us back is the most puzzling thing I have heard as recent history suggests it has nothing but positive results for most clubs

Crows in the late 90 's went for Blight almost instant success
Brisbane removed Walls - Mathews comes in 2-3 years bingo
Port - Mark Williams
Sydney Paul Roos
Crows again - Neil Craig
Bulldogs - turning it around
Tigers looking better
Hawthorn - Developing all be it slowly and with what appears to be a forward thinking plan that all supporters can see

Then look at the clubs that have hung on to their coaches
Essendon* - Should have won 4-5 flags in the 90's
Freo - How long has Chris been there
Geelong - Is Bomber ever going to deliver
St Killda must be 6 or so year of Thomas and nothing
Collingwood- Will Malthouse ever raise that cup again - doubt it


If we lose tommorrow and wind up with a spoon again - surely the writing must be on the wall

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:24 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Richmond - name the successful coaches before Wallace - here I'll start you off with one - Frawley.

St Kilda - here I'll give you two - Blight, Watson

Crows - you forgot their previous coach nabbed to win a flag - Ayers (put him down for Geelong as well)

Fremantle - they've grabbed some new coaches that have really worked.

In fact I'll make you a bet SB - I bet I can name more unsuccessful coaches than you can name successful coaches. :-D

Of Course there can be a few other reasons for coaches not to be successful.

Lists, removed by a board to save its arse, luck, and apparently, according to some, no Carey - for with Carey surely even a Frawley, a Watson, an Ayers would have won several flags.

As for our list - I am actually really, really excited by it and understand that being a list where the potential lies in the kids far more than anywhere else (No Macleod, Riccuto etc) I also understand that it will take time. Just as 3 years ago the Bulldogs were going to take time, even St Kilda were given time.

What people seem to forget is that before St Kilda were given time (or Bulldogs) they first had to assemble a list worthy of being given time to.

Carlton needed to do exactly the same and from much further back (yes I know old news lets forget the past, future, future, future ra ra ra). I actually think if 3 things happen we'll start to really push the year after next.

Those 3 things are

1) A CHB - Hansen? Thorpe? Gumbleton?

2) A midfielder (or 2) (with pace) as good (roughly) as Murph

3) Aisake or Batson (and if both we are away) to really make it.

Those 3 with the development of our kids and with others added and with time to develop experience/strength etc we'll start whacking clubs back in two years. With serious whacking in about 3/4.

I do not think this process can be rushed.

Everyone points to Craig - yep he is going exceptionally well but at the same time he has an excellent list filled with mature bodies, plenty of run and plenty of muscle. Next time you watch the Crows have a look at the size of their blokes compared to ours.

We are building such a list and just like the Ayers years at The Crows we need to let them come on - or are you suggesting if Craig had the Crows say 6 years ago, they'd be at the same spot? Or would he be developing those bodies first (albiet he may be doing it better than anyone else but we'll never know)

Is Denis the coach for the next flag? - to tell the truth I am not convinced, but nor do I think he is damaging the list. I like what I see being assembled, and unlike others I am enjoyng the development of players - could it be done faster? The heart will always scream yes because I want wins now, the head says I'd need to be at the club, in the system teaching those kids to give a realistic answer.

The other part in all this is that although some of us - me included - do not believe in tanking, nor believe the club will tank - the truth still remains that when building a list there is a powerful argument that says it is better to lose than to win. In that respect we have done well of late.

And we'll never know if I am right and Carlton would never set out to lose just to rebuild a list or if I am very wrong.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:28 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:56 pm
Posts: 113
dannyboy wrote:


Carlton needed to do exactly the same and from much further back (yes I know old news lets forget the past, future, future, future ra ra ra). I actually think if 3 things happen we'll start to really push the year after next.

Those 3 things are

1) A CHB - Hansen? Thorpe? Gumbleton?

2) A midfielder (or 2) (with pace) as good (roughly) as Murph

3) Aisake or Batson (and if both we are away) to really make it.





1, Will most likely happen if we win today
2. Wont happen if we win today...so we will only get 1 of these 2 options
3. Highly doubt either of these blokes will make it

So how will we go with 1/3 things we most need.

For me these things are better resolved

1. CHB...One of the emerging Bower/Hartlett/Edwards
2. Get Gibbs
3. Recruit a ready made ruckmen through trade or pre season

_________________
Succumb to your highest emotion!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:35 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
You are thinking it all must be resolved this draft.

Next years

and the year afters.

We keep adding.... Expect high picks the next two years (not 1 or 2's but still good picks)

Aisake seems to be coming along nicely (just like his brother) why do you think he will not make it?

As for Batson I've only seen him train and like his movement - why will he not make it?

Not saying he will or wont but how do you know at this stage?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pagan and cashflow
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:14 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
steve wrote:
If I was the club, I would be approaching Denis and asking him to take a pay cut. To make it realistic I'd offer a similar deal to the one that was offered to Kouta a few years back.

Take Denis' remaining two years, and pay him the same amount over a three year contract.

Benefits:
1) it would reduce expenses in 2007 and 2008 and improve our cashflow by around $200k per year (based on media estimates of his contract)
2) it gives the club access to him at the reduce rate in 2009
3) the dollar value of the contract hasn't changed, so if we end up paying him out by the end of 2008 nothing has changed in dollar terms

The only weakness I can see in this scenario is if Denis made it to the end of 2008 and we wanted to get rid of him, then we'd have to find the money to pay out the 2009 contract. But, under the current terms we'd have already spent that money, so there would be no net loss, only the risk that we still weren't viable enough to pay it out.

I thought this might provide Denis the incentive of another year to turn things around, help our cashflow a little over the next two years and not financially hurt the club if we had to pay him out. It's unlikely that Denis will get a good offer at the end of his current Carlton contract, so it may be of interest to him.

Thoughts?
I want him gone tomorrow let alone him hanging around until 2009. Don't care if we are kicking and screaming in the gutter, financially we'll be alot beter off in the long run. It's taken nearly 4 years just to get 20 wins (including 10 in one year) and we're heading possibly to our worst year (season win/lose ratio) under him yet as we still need 2 win jut to beat his previous worst in 2003. Hard enough when you consider we can't even beat Essendon*.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:33 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
dannyboy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Steve from what have read in the papers the last few months we are financially better off now than we were when we signed Pagan almost 16 months ago on and extended contract . Pagan knows that and he would have known that when he signed the last contract . He will no way known take a cut to extend his contract by one extra year . Kouta in someways done the honouralbe thing and extended his contract to both ensure he played longer than he would have and to help the club.(mind you he was on a pretty penny to begin with) - fact or opinion?

'Pagan is not Kouta with Pagan its all about Pagan and no one else.' - fact or opinion? And does this imply Kouita is not about himself and is about everyone else? - or maybe both are people, both think about others and themselves? And is it worse to pay too much for a coach (no salary cap influence) or a player (with salary cap influencs)?

'He coaches for himself and this is obvious by team selections and his history at Carlton.' - or he is coaching for the club and does not give a distant fart for your opinions, not swayed by popularity but by what he thinks is right. Which is it? you and I will never know. Denis appears adamant that you should not just bring the kids in and play them
but rather develop them. So disagree with his development plans but don't pretend he has no plan.

'He went half cocked' - half-cocked? Based on what?

'in the preseason trying to event a gameplan that would avoid beltings and with the aid of the draft and a refinement to that gameplan we will improve next year . He will peak the side for the first 6 or so games and maybe the Nab Cup (are you implying here Pagan got the boys up for the NAB cup only to get a contract extension?) and then go hell for leather at Sticks and Smorgan to get that contract extended .' or the team is improving along the lines he/ the club expects.

'Will they buy it this time . you bet your arse they will 'they will be climbing over themselves to sign him again . I just hope Fitzy brings them to their senses .' so if they do, Fitzy failed, if they don't Fitzy was the reason. Nothing to do with anyone else? Gee you have great knoweldge of the workings of this club.

'See what most people tend to forget' -think no one has forgotten this, no one, but it makes you sound as if you know what you are talking about, as if you are tlaking facts raher than an opinion.

'is the reason you hire a coach like Pagan and pay the dollars you do is that they are supposed to be better than other coaches they are supposed to bring the best out of the playing group . Pagan hasn't and doesn't look like doing it any time soon . We have hired what we thought was a Super Coach and ended up with a Grant Thomas . The side will improve through sheer weight of draft picks ala St kilda . But thats not the reason Pagan was hired for he was Hired to get us there quicker' - quicker than what? What was seen as a quick time frame? Ten years? Seven years? And are you talking here about when he was first hired (to save JE's arse) or resigned?

'and it must be obvious now even to the most ardent Pagan supporter that this is not happening .' depends on that time frame I'd suggest. I keep remembering Wallsy saying 7 to 10 years before we are competitive again and whenever I get frustrated (often I admit these last 3 years) I remember that its 2 to go for the bottom end of his prediction!

'He should be tapped on the shoulder now - paid out and someone newer brought in . This could see a total turn around in the clubs on field performance thus negating the effects of having to pay Pagan out by the interest in the fans . Because lets face it we have been crap for 5 years now its getting a bit tiresome and even the diehard fans are struggling to show interest
' he could be tapped and we could bring someone knew in and if we do not improve, or worse, we improve for a year and then fall back again, or two years and fall back again because the new coach makes decision based on short term fixes and suddenly a ten year term of shite becomes a fifteen, a twenty, a relocation plan?

I have no problems with questioning his tactics, his selections etc. I get frustrated sometimes because I want the kids to play, because we kick in worse than other treams according to my (limited) observations but I try and remember that in reality I know nothing about the team, about nurturing footballers, about strucures etc. So while I might become frustrated i try to keep it in perspective. I am a supporter with little real information.

Pagan is undoubtably making mistakes and in the end I expect the club to weigh up those mistakes against his success and make a decisioon. In no way do I think he is evil, out to destroy the club or any other scenario. He is a man coaching a team.

This site is becoming a lynch mob - no logic, no reasoning, just a need to find a scapegoat and hang them from the nearest tree.

We must look at the coach and evaluate his efforts

We must also use reason not hatred or bias.

We should try and remember we do not know what is happening only what we think is happening.
Who says we hate him or think he's evil. We'd like someone who'd has a better record than 24% (16% without 2004). We just want to win more games each year, not less (10 & a wizzer, to 4 last year to probably less again). It looks like we'll be worse off again than in his first year, making it his worst ever since he started if that's how it turns out. Now that's real progression. Our team is better individually than it was 2 years ago when we won 10 games yet on that count we go backwards. They're pretty fair facts, with plently of logic and reasoning. And you think there's none? You fair dinkum?! What more do you want. We can't even beat Essendon*!

No logic or reasoning......with those facts......now that's funny!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:05 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Jim before you try and sound intelligent reread SB's thread. :roll:

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AGRO, Scotty12000, sticksaftersiren87 and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group