Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Apr 09, 2026 10:00 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4556 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 224, 225, 226, 227, 228
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2026 9:58 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20647
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Mickstar wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
Ok, that's fair. What I'm getting at though is that it's a crap strength to have right now. I think other teams would accept break even in stoppage given their weapons lie elsewhere.

For me our weapon is not sustainable nor appropriate in the game as we see it now.


I hear what you're say BH but the top 3 sides for clearances this year are the back to back premiers, Bulldogs (top of the ladder) and Freo. (4th on the ladder.
Being the best at scoring from clearance is a huge benefit IMO. But it can't be your only weapon.
Let's face it. McKay currently isn't providing any scoring ability inside 50. Push him up the ground, try to get more connection between our forward half and back half and we should see an improvement in scoring from ball movement. Add to our strengths. Don't try to remove them to build a different one.


100 per cent make the most of what you've got . We aint far away .
OK. On that I totally disagree. We are miles off it.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2026 10:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11181
Blue Vain wrote:
Personally, I think Hoyne is spot on. You don't try to fix a problem by reducing a strength. You address your weaknesses.
We're the best team at scoring from stoppages but 18th for scoring from turnover and ball movement.
That's where your players are getting fatigued. Ideally you transition the ball from defence to your forward 50 and the players lock it in there.
As he said, we had the ball in our defensive 50 115 times and been rewarded with one goal from the times we win it back.
We have perpetual motion where we kick it out of defensive 50, we're outmarked or it spills from the contest and we're chasing arse again.

McKay has to play up the ground. They also spoke about Freo. They go to a contest, ensure they're not outmarked and they set up to win the contested footy when it hits the deck. We don't have that aerial contest. Harry is soft as butter IMO but he gives a solid contest when he can launch at the ball. His link work for our defenders is quite good. And if he doesn't mark it, we're the best team at scoring from stoppage. Get a stop play. It's much better than our current situation of being outmarked or the ball spilling into space.

We have a strength. Capitalise on it. Don't try to be something you're structurally incapable of being. It's not like Harry is firing inside 50. He has been targeted 35 times inside forward 50 for 8 marks. And then his kicking is a lottery at best.
No wonder Hayward is getting frustrated. He was bought in as a hybrid forward and he's been targeted 4 times.
Get some connection up the ground and start getting it inside 50.
We're 15th in the AFL for inside 50's. Last year we were 5th. Get it in there. I don't give a @#$%&! if they kick it to grass or to space along the ground! At least create a contest. Gives the smalls a look. Mix it up.

You can't kick goals if you don't get it there.


Can't agree.
We have been playing contested football and have failed. We cannot keep doing what we are doing and to put the blame on one person (Harry) is a little harsh.
He provides the target on the wing for our defensive outs, so it's not as if he is just planted in the square. I just feel he can't do much more as an individual but yes, he should keep his feet, use the bloody body more and hold his marks, but the effort is there and he is doing what is being asked of him.

I think this week's side is more balanced, but we need to use the ground and structure up right to run and carry as a unit.
I don't think we'll win, as we are down in confidence, but it's a start to see some run on the wings and half back / forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 9:45 am 
Online
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6627
SurreyBlue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Personally, I think Hoyne is spot on. You don't try to fix a problem by reducing a strength. You address your weaknesses.
We're the best team at scoring from stoppages but 18th for scoring from turnover and ball movement.
That's where your players are getting fatigued. Ideally you transition the ball from defence to your forward 50 and the players lock it in there.
As he said, we had the ball in our defensive 50 115 times and been rewarded with one goal from the times we win it back.
We have perpetual motion where we kick it out of defensive 50, we're outmarked or it spills from the contest and we're chasing arse again.

McKay has to play up the ground. They also spoke about Freo. They go to a contest, ensure they're not outmarked and they set up to win the contested footy when it hits the deck. We don't have that aerial contest. Harry is soft as butter IMO but he gives a solid contest when he can launch at the ball. His link work for our defenders is quite good. And if he doesn't mark it, we're the best team at scoring from stoppage. Get a stop play. It's much better than our current situation of being outmarked or the ball spilling into space.

We have a strength. Capitalise on it. Don't try to be something you're structurally incapable of being. It's not like Harry is firing inside 50. He has been targeted 35 times inside forward 50 for 8 marks. And then his kicking is a lottery at best.
No wonder Hayward is getting frustrated. He was bought in as a hybrid forward and he's been targeted 4 times.
Get some connection up the ground and start getting it inside 50.
We're 15th in the AFL for inside 50's. Last year we were 5th. Get it in there. I don't give a @#$%&! if they kick it to grass or to space along the ground! At least create a contest. Gives the smalls a look. Mix it up.

You can't kick goals if you don't get it there.


Can't agree.
We have been playing contested football and have failed. We cannot keep doing what we are doing and to put the blame on one person (Harry) is a little harsh.
He provides the target on the wing for our defensive outs, so it's not as if he is just planted in the square. I just feel he can't do much more as an individual but yes, he should keep his feet, use the bloody body more and hold his marks, but the effort is there and he is doing what is being asked of him.

I think this week's side is more balanced, but we need to use the ground and structure up right to run and carry as a unit.
I don't think we'll win, as we are down in confidence, but it's a start to see some run on the wings and half back / forward.


Honestly some people like the club are deluded
The contested win clearances game has been dead almost 2 years
Nothing has been done about it it since 2024


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:39 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3124
Absolutely no point in sacking Voss right now. The season is over no matter who they appoint. Better to start fresh without the complications of a temporary coach who will either be an assistant or even worse ... Adam Simpson.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 2:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26486
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Personally, I think Hoyne is spot on. You don't try to fix a problem by reducing a strength. You address your weaknesses.
We're the best team at scoring from stoppages but 18th for scoring from turnover and ball movement.
That's where your players are getting fatigued. Ideally you transition the ball from defence to your forward 50 and the players lock it in there.
As he said, we had the ball in our defensive 50 115 times and been rewarded with one goal from the times we win it back.
We have perpetual motion where we kick it out of defensive 50, we're outmarked or it spills from the contest and we're chasing arse again.

McKay has to play up the ground. They also spoke about Freo. They go to a contest, ensure they're not outmarked and they set up to win the contested footy when it hits the deck. We don't have that aerial contest. Harry is soft as butter IMO but he gives a solid contest when he can launch at the ball. His link work for our defenders is quite good. And if he doesn't mark it, we're the best team at scoring from stoppage. Get a stop play. It's much better than our current situation of being outmarked or the ball spilling into space.

We have a strength. Capitalise on it. Don't try to be something you're structurally incapable of being. It's not like Harry is firing inside 50. He has been targeted 35 times inside forward 50 for 8 marks. And then his kicking is a lottery at best.
No wonder Hayward is getting frustrated. He was bought in as a hybrid forward and he's been targeted 4 times.
Get some connection up the ground and start getting it inside 50.
We're 15th in the AFL for inside 50's. Last year we were 5th. Get it in there. I don't give a @#$%&! if they kick it to grass or to space along the ground! At least create a contest. Gives the smalls a look. Mix it up.

You can't kick goals if you don't get it there.


Can't agree.
We have been playing contested football and have failed. We cannot keep doing what we are doing and to put the blame on one person (Harry) is a little harsh.
He provides the target on the wing for our defensive outs, so it's not as if he is just planted in the square. I just feel he can't do much more as an individual but yes, he should keep his feet, use the bloody body more and hold his marks, but the effort is there and he is doing what is being asked of him.

I think this week's side is more balanced, but we need to use the ground and structure up right to run and carry as a unit.
I don't think we'll win, as we are down in confidence, but it's a start to see some run on the wings and half back / forward.


Honestly some people like the club are deluded
The contested win clearances game has been dead almost 2 years
Nothing has been done about it it since 2024


I think we have failed to add speed on the outside.

Took a while to be convinced with Sidex POV but Ollie Hollands might have stamina to burn, but he hasn’t got elite speed. We haven’t settled on our wings in last 2 years. Acres is a machine but doesn’t have speed. Lord, Walsh, Cerra in the middle are quick but not elite speed. Jagga is elusive and makes space but Ive seen him get caught too. He doesn’t have elite speed to run away from the contest.

I think that’s the main issue. ditto at HB and HF.

We need sprinklings of speed…just 2-3 quick ones, but we haven’t found them. Bring back Frank Marchesani, or what about Petrucelli? Which brings me to the point, we need speed but they need to be good footballers too: footy IQ.

I’m just guessing like the rest of us.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 2:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18471
keogh wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Personally, I think Hoyne is spot on. You don't try to fix a problem by reducing a strength. You address your weaknesses.
We're the best team at scoring from stoppages but 18th for scoring from turnover and ball movement.
That's where your players are getting fatigued. Ideally you transition the ball from defence to your forward 50 and the players lock it in there.
As he said, we had the ball in our defensive 50 115 times and been rewarded with one goal from the times we win it back.
We have perpetual motion where we kick it out of defensive 50, we're outmarked or it spills from the contest and we're chasing arse again.

McKay has to play up the ground. They also spoke about Freo. They go to a contest, ensure they're not outmarked and they set up to win the contested footy when it hits the deck. We don't have that aerial contest. Harry is soft as butter IMO but he gives a solid contest when he can launch at the ball. His link work for our defenders is quite good. And if he doesn't mark it, we're the best team at scoring from stoppage. Get a stop play. It's much better than our current situation of being outmarked or the ball spilling into space.

We have a strength. Capitalise on it. Don't try to be something you're structurally incapable of being. It's not like Harry is firing inside 50. He has been targeted 35 times inside forward 50 for 8 marks. And then his kicking is a lottery at best.
No wonder Hayward is getting frustrated. He was bought in as a hybrid forward and he's been targeted 4 times.
Get some connection up the ground and start getting it inside 50.
We're 15th in the AFL for inside 50's. Last year we were 5th. Get it in there. I don't give a @#$%&! if they kick it to grass or to space along the ground! At least create a contest. Gives the smalls a look. Mix it up.

You can't kick goals if you don't get it there.


Can't agree.
We have been playing contested football and have failed. We cannot keep doing what we are doing and to put the blame on one person (Harry) is a little harsh.
He provides the target on the wing for our defensive outs, so it's not as if he is just planted in the square. I just feel he can't do much more as an individual but yes, he should keep his feet, use the bloody body more and hold his marks, but the effort is there and he is doing what is being asked of him.

I think this week's side is more balanced, but we need to use the ground and structure up right to run and carry as a unit.
I don't think we'll win, as we are down in confidence, but it's a start to see some run on the wings and half back / forward.


Honestly some people like the club are deluded
The contested win clearances game has been dead almost 2 years
Nothing has been done about it it since 2024



Hmm. Top of the AFL ladder leader Western Bulldogs are No.1 in the AFL for centre clearances.
Scores from stoppage? Back to back premiers are 2nd in the AFL. Top of the ladder Bulldogs are 3rd. 3rd on the ladder Gold Coast are ranked 4th in the AFL for scores from stoppage. 2nd on the ladder Sydney are 5th ranked team in the AFL from scoring from stoppage :?

So, in summary, the back to back Premiers and the top 3 on the AFL ladder are in the top 5 for scoring from stoppage.

In fact, 8 of the top 9 on the AFL ladder fill 8 of the top 9 spots of teams that score most from stoppage. Quite compelling really.
Yet according to you, the clearance game has been dead for almost 2 years. Great work.
The problem is we're failing at the other phases of scoring. Winning clearance will always be a bonus.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Thu Apr 09, 2026 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 3:23 pm 
Online
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7737
where do we rank in allowing scores from stoppage? we can cherry pick all the stats we want around clearances and stoppage, but imo there's no point, espesh when we can't deliver 4 qtrs of sustained attack.

we have no transition game. we don't ever go coast to coast. scoring from our D50 is among the worst in the league, and did i read correctly we are dead last in giving up scores from turnovers?

... we are so poor in every other aspect of the game - when we are bottom 3 or 4 on the ladder and when we've only won 12 of our last 36 games, we are in deep, stinking shit for a reason.

we've put all our eggs into just one aspect of the game, and neglected all others.

i'd rather be mid table in all the stats across the board, but contending - than having one single stat line that's impressive (even if we cannot sustain this over 4 qtrs of footy) and bottom 3 in the league material


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 3:33 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11181
Braithy wrote:
where do we rank in allowing scores from stoppage? we can cherry pick all the stats we want around clearances and stoppage, but imo there's no point, espesh when we can't deliver 4 qtrs of sustained attack.

we have no transition game. we don't ever go coast to coast. scoring from our D50 is among the worst in the league, and did i read correctly we are dead last in giving up scores from turnovers?

... we are so poor in every other aspect of the game - when we are bottom 3 or 4 on the ladder and when we've only won 12 of our last 36 games, we are in deep, stinking shit for a reason.

we've put all our eggs into just one aspect of the game, and neglected all others.

i'd rather be mid table in all the stats across the board, but contending - than having one single stat line that's impressive (even if we cannot sustain this over 4 qtrs of footy) and bottom 3 in the league material


This is it in a nutshell. Well said Braithy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 3:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18471
Braithy wrote:
where do we rank in allowing scores from stoppage? we can cherry pick all the stats we want around clearances and stoppage, but imo there's no point, espesh when we can't deliver 4 qtrs of sustained attack.

we have no transition game. we don't ever go coast to coast. scoring from our D50 is among the worst in the league, and did i read correctly we are dead last in giving up scores from turnovers?

... we are so poor in every other aspect of the game - when we are bottom 3 or 4 on the ladder and when we've only won 12 of our last 36 games, we are in deep, stinking shit for a reason.

we've put all our eggs into just one aspect of the game, and neglected all others.

i'd rather be mid table in all the stats across the board, but contending - than having one single stat line that's impressive (even if we cannot sustain this over 4 qtrs of footy) and bottom 3 in the league material


We're 6th best in the AFL comparatively, even though we don't want to cherry pick stats.
You're saying exactly what I said originally. Yes our transition game is shit, our turnover game is shit. But you don't look to remove our one actual strength unless it is the cause of the other issues.
Any scoring source is valuable. It's ridiculous to say scoring from clearance is redundant. The best teams in the AFL excel at it. The difference is they are also competent elsewhere. That should be our focus.
Just kicking shit out of the club is a sport for some of the flogs here. It achieves nothing.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 3:41 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11181
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
where do we rank in allowing scores from stoppage? we can cherry pick all the stats we want around clearances and stoppage, but imo there's no point, espesh when we can't deliver 4 qtrs of sustained attack.

we have no transition game. we don't ever go coast to coast. scoring from our D50 is among the worst in the league, and did i read correctly we are dead last in giving up scores from turnovers?

... we are so poor in every other aspect of the game - when we are bottom 3 or 4 on the ladder and when we've only won 12 of our last 36 games, we are in deep, stinking shit for a reason.

we've put all our eggs into just one aspect of the game, and neglected all others.

i'd rather be mid table in all the stats across the board, but contending - than having one single stat line that's impressive (even if we cannot sustain this over 4 qtrs of footy) and bottom 3 in the league material


We're 6th best in the AFL, even though we don't want to cherry pick stats.
You're saying exactly what I said originally. Yes our transition game is shit, our turnover game is shit. But you don't look to remove our one actual strength unless it is the cause of the other issues.
Any scoring source is valuable. It's ridiculous to say scoring from clearance is redundant. The best teams in the AFL excel at it. The difference is they are also competent elsewhere. That should be our focus.
Just kicking shit out of the club is a sport for some of the flogs here. It achieves nothing.


I think we are all saying the same thing, yet we are debating it anyway. :lol:
As for the flogs part - that’s a bit harhs, I think people should be allowed to voice their opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 3:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18471
SurreyBlue wrote:
I think we are all saying the same thing, yet we are debating it anyway. :lol:
As for the flogs part - that’s a bit harhs, I think people should be allowed to voice their opinion.


Keogh wasn't here to debate. He was taking uninformed, unprovoked cheap shots as usual.
I was just returning him the favour.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20647
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
I'm happy to put my hand up and say I'm a flog.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18471
:lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 18275
Location: Melbourne
bluehammer wrote:
I'm happy to put my hand up and say I'm a flog.


Acceptance is the first path to enlightenment Bluey :thumbsup: ..........................that's why I have stayed out of the 'Carlton is apparently shite' discussion in 2026. It is all very pointless, shouting at clouds like grandpa Simpson. :eek:

These days, I find it much more therapeutic documenting the complete ineptitude of the KGB Messiah, rather than the failings of Carlton FC. Sad days Bluey, sad days.

Thank goodness we have music to fall back on. :thanks: :thanks: :thanks:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”

Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:39 pm 
Online
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7737
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
where do we rank in allowing scores from stoppage? we can cherry pick all the stats we want around clearances and stoppage, but imo there's no point, espesh when we can't deliver 4 qtrs of sustained attack.

we have no transition game. we don't ever go coast to coast. scoring from our D50 is among the worst in the league, and did i read correctly we are dead last in giving up scores from turnovers?

... we are so poor in every other aspect of the game - when we are bottom 3 or 4 on the ladder and when we've only won 12 of our last 36 games, we are in deep, stinking shit for a reason.

we've put all our eggs into just one aspect of the game, and neglected all others.

i'd rather be mid table in all the stats across the board, but contending - than having one single stat line that's impressive (even if we cannot sustain this over 4 qtrs of footy) and bottom 3 in the league material


We're 6th best in the AFL comparatively, even though we don't want to cherry pick stats.
You're saying exactly what I said originally. Yes our transition game is shit, our turnover game is shit. But you don't look to remove our one actual strength unless it is the cause of the other issues.
Any scoring source is valuable. It's ridiculous to say scoring from clearance is redundant. The best teams in the AFL excel at it. The difference is they are also competent elsewhere. That should be our focus.
Just kicking shit out of the club is a sport for some of the flogs here. It achieves nothing.


sorry. my point was ... you may have to remove, or at the minimum reduce this strength of the contest, in order to be a better team.

the piece in the contest game, don't translate to slick or fat ball movement, and defensively cannot chase.

i don't want to take our 1 wood from us. but imo, we can't keep it and win games of footy. it's our strength, and also our achilles


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:40 pm 
Online
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7737
bluehammer wrote:
I'm happy to put my hand up and say I'm a flog.



me too. but right now i'm flog and i'm losing. i would much rather be a flog and winning.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4556 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 224, 225, 226, 227, 228

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluedog, Braithy, daggs001, famousblueraincoat, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], GreatEx, jim, keogh, killpies, rhino27, sinbagger, Traveller86, WOW and 127 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group