I think neither the coach nor the list is good enough, which is why we're always flip flopping and arguing the two.
I don't want us changing coach without changing the core of the list. We've seen enough of this list to know that Cripps, H, CC, ZW, JW, Saad, Newman, Gov etc (focusing on stars/high earners, obviously there are more like Haynes) will not win a flag here, so we should reorient the list towards the next window. I do not want a complete rebuild because of Tasmania, because we have promising f/s prospects coming up who need proper support, and because so many clubs in so many sports follow this blind faith in tank-and-draft that more often than not leads to a terminal loser culture.
That loser culture is plainly evident at Carlton - when watching games live on TV I find myself half-watching half-doomscrolling in the final quarter even when there's less than a kick in it, because I know we don't have the mentality to win. Like Jesse Motlop presented with a moderately difficult crumb-and-goal chance, we're happy to get some 2 parts out of 3 right and just fall short. Can't fault the effort, close enough is good enough, etc.
For this reason, the next phase should not be a total rebuild but there needs to be a purge of those inculcated in the 21st century Carlton way. That means no Cripps, no Walsh, no H/CC, not even Weitering. Of the core, we should prioritise those who grew up in winning cultures. Hewett the obvious one, Newman even though he's old. Struggling to think of others (some have come through even worse formations, like Saad at early GCS and * - heaven help us!) so I would not be looking to trade everyone for draft assets, I would be looking to trade for proven winners, even those getting a bit grey in the beard.
Wright has got his work cut out for him. Don't rush it, don't make the easy choices. If it takes 3-4 years to reshape us into a decent side then so be it. Not like we're going anywhere in that time frame as it stands.
|