Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sydney
99prelim wrote:


2. My 'teacher thingy' is grounded in years of research. The single greatest indicator of student success is the teacher, not their socio economic status etc


Agree with this wholeheartedly - all the teachers who couldnt be bothered with a difficult student drove me to succeed in life - im not saying im all that much of a success but I earn double that of most teachers - always wanted to return to school one day just to rub their grubby red noses in it but now I couldnt be bothered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:17 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
dannyboy wrote:
99prelim wrote:


2. My 'teacher thingy' is grounded in years of research. The single greatest indicator of student success is the teacher, not their socio economic status etc

3. How would you know that I (or others) write with a bias and express our hopes, dreams and desires in our musings on this forum. You don't even know me yet you've passed comment on me. Shame on you for forming an opinion of me without being part of my inner sanctum
[/quote]

on 2 - absolute shite research then - the single greatest indicator of student success is the student.

3. actually I was talking about myself. I accept that about me - the rest is fiction.


Josh - as I've actually said elsewhere - I have no idea if Ratts is the best available -

I do like Roos and Micky Malt but I accept that I have no true understanding of this subject - having never coached, never interviewed prospective coaches etc...

I worry that Ratts is learning on the job (something you mentioned in an different thread, and therefore I think we need to mentor him (see prelim's point 2 :grin: ) and I get frustrated at our lack of progress (like winning more than 2 games in a row) but I accept we average about 77 games as a team while the good ones average a lot more (Collingwood 105)

I think there are probably better coaches out there but I am not so sure Ratts being coach will prevent us from winning the 17th just as I am not sure getting the best ensures it.

I also think most of my opinions are based on not having all the information so silly yo expect the club to consider them.


And that is why I do all my yelling and ranting at the football where it is released into the air and soon forgotten about.[/quote]


DB. Arguing for the sake of arguing compromises your intelligence (and I have formed an opinion of you that you're an intelligent man)

Refuting research by calling it shite is just churlish.
If you were talking about yourself in a previous thread, why did you use the word, "our" more than once?

You don't feel informed enough about making comments regarding Ratten...thats fine
Using that argument, your'e just as ill informed about the perspectives and contexts in which others make their comments

I've also formed an opinion of you that you enjoy getting the last word in on a discussion. if you respond, that's fine....I will read it and respect your point of view.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
just on 2 - explain how the teacher is a greater indicator of success than a student?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Danny, you said you would judge Ratten at the end of the year. well, it is the end of the year- so time for you to answer this question.
Is Ratten the best coach available to lead us to flag number 17?
As Ive said many times- thats the standard.



standards are usually easily quantifiable.....this one.......not so easily quantifiable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 452
Location: next to you in the outer
Students will learn with or without a teacher but a great teacher will provide guidance, explicit ongoing feedback, motivation and direct instruction they will know when to push or when to step back. They will make students aware of what they do not know and over time change habits or create new habits to help them think make decisions to effectively solve and create problems.

All current research does confirm that the teacher has the greatest influence over a child in terms of learning outcomes.

You might find this link from TED interesting about kids teaching themselves in India but it appears that at a certain point direction/facilitation is required to go to the next step! Much like AFL footballers they all have ability and natural talent but a great coach will get them to an elite level.

Are you suggesting that a coach doesn't improve a footballer and that it is entirely up to the player? Leigh Brown from Colonwood ??

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/sugat ... elves.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:37 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:23 pm
Posts: 715
dannyboy wrote:
just on 2 - explain how the teacher is a greater indicator of success than a student?



Look at the education system.. The reason private school students receive better marks isn't because the students are naturally better, but because they are taught the right things and placed in the best possible environment for the best chance at success in exams..

_________________
#23: Lachlan Henderson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
Talking Carlton hit an all time low (just ask the google ads) last summer when various people continued to repeat themselves over and over and over again sh*t canning Ratten. I like this site but I hope I don't have to put up with that crap for the next 6 months.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:55 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
yes, very boring.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:07 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
I think a teacher is a part but the greatest part?

I think a coach is a part but without the players?

Could any coach have gotten a flag with last year's Richmond side?

I think the coaching staff establishes things for the team - how they might work in the back six, how to bring the ball out etc but a coach needs cattle that can run, can kick etc. I seriously do not believe we have all the cattle and yet we made it to the 8 and really could have won that final against Sydney in Sydney after playing a cracker game against Freo in Freo the week before.

Am I happy with Ratts and Co - actually no but not to the point where every post I make has to somehow denigrate Ratts and lays all the failures at his feet and none of the successes.

It seems if we applied that to teachers then every failed student is a teacher's fault - and that is not the case. I know - I worked for 20 years with many who were their fault (or the system's) but they also had parents that had issues - money that was scare, lots of shifting around (especially those that had been booted out of home and lived wherever they could) and many of the points missing (or unsteady) in Maslow's heirarchy

and finally and most importantly - themselves - whether it be because they had mental ( and physical) illness issues or whether they just had not copped with what life had thrown at them.

Carlton still have not got (in my mind) the required 26/7 players needed to push for a top 4 finish - we are closer and with more experience and some lunch this summer we may even be there in the next year or so but if I do not think we are there now then how can I expect Ratts to get them there? Or blame him if he doesn't ?

As for this year's report card - I, like many, did not think we would make the eight this year - or perhaps it would be better to say I would not have been surprised - partly due to Fev and Stevo going but mostly because I thought Ratts would struggle

yet we did make the eight so I would have to give Ratts a B I think. I'd rather an A grade coach but I suspect an A grade coach needs an A grade list that ticks off all the boxes

Blend of
Youth
Experience
Speed
Height
Depth
Class
Desire
Confidence
Luck
(and a few other things I've probably forgotten)

and finally - then I'll shut up (for prelim and only in this thread) - if Ratts is a young coach learning and at this point he's a B grade coach - can he become an A grade coach?

Would it be great for the club if as the side grew he grew?

I do not know the answer to that and I'd suggest neither does anyone else

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
great. close the thread.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 5:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
Interesting listening to Greg Swan on 3AW last night. He was saying that the club will not rush into re-signing Ratts and Ratten is aware that they'll be leaving their judgement until the end of the year. (A good decision IMO). Obviously the Knights debacle has influenced clubs to take a little more time before wasting money.

He also stated that Carlton is aiming for the top 4 instead of finishing in the bottom of the 8 like the previous couple of years. Personally I'm rapt to hear that is the clubs expectation. Ratts has a tendency to hose down expectation IMO and waffle on about "winning a final" which is nonsense. We were a kick away from winning an away final in 2008. 2 years down the track, you'd want to be expecting much more than that. Unfortunately if the lower expectation prevails, it will be reflected in the expectations of the players. The coaching changes over the off season were'nt the result of a simple "freshen up". The administration were unhappy with the direction of the coaching group and they made decisions that will ensure a change of methodology and direction.

Interestingly, Healy asked Swan what Ratten would need to achieve to retain his job. Swann stated that Carlton "would need to improve....possibly substantially". I like that. Good clubs expect success and with about 8 or 9 coaches coming out of contract in 2011, it's a buyers market.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Stand by for a year of relentless meda speculation and harassment, it will be unbearable from July onwards.

That will seem like a tea party compared to TC.

Im not saying we need to, but there's a reason why clubs re-appoint early.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:33 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
..and we definitely don't need to re appoint ratten early.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:52 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6413
I have taught kids in a low socio economic area for 20 years
The quality of the teacher makes very little difference to student achievement in this area.

Couldnt give a @#$%&! what research they say.

It comes down to motivation within the individual

You can make a difference but it is marginal

Ratten has the advantage of delisting players if they dont peform.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:54 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Greg Swan on 3AW last night. He was saying that the club will not rush into re-signing Ratts and Ratten is aware that they'll be leaving their judgement until the end of the year. (A good decision IMO). Obviously the Knights debacle has influenced clubs to take a little more time before wasting money.

He also stated that Carlton is aiming for the top 4 instead of finishing in the bottom of the 8 like the previous couple of years. Personally I'm rapt to hear that is the clubs expectation. Ratts has a tendency to hose down expectation IMO and waffle on about "winning a final" which is nonsense. We were a kick away from winning an away final in 2008. 2 years down the track, you'd want to be expecting much more than that. Unfortunately if the lower expectation prevails, it will be reflected in the expectations of the players. The coaching changes over the off season were'nt the result of a simple "freshen up". The administration were unhappy with the direction of the coaching group and they made decisions that will ensure a change of methodology and direction.

Interestingly, Healy asked Swan what Ratten would need to achieve to retain his job. Swann stated that Carlton "would need to improve....possibly substantially". I like that. Good clubs expect success and with about 8 or 9 coaches coming out of contract in 2011, it's a buyers market.


Didn't hear the interview but that's reads as exactly where expectations should be. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:28 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Ratten has done a fabulous job ... looking forward to his continued coaching at the CFC.




:smoking: :smoking:

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Rexy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Greg Swan on 3AW last night. He was saying that the club will not rush into re-signing Ratts and Ratten is aware that they'll be leaving their judgement until the end of the year. (A good decision IMO). Obviously the Knights debacle has influenced clubs to take a little more time before wasting money.

He also stated that Carlton is aiming for the top 4 instead of finishing in the bottom of the 8 like the previous couple of years. Personally I'm rapt to hear that is the clubs expectation. Ratts has a tendency to hose down expectation IMO and waffle on about "winning a final" which is nonsense. We were a kick away from winning an away final in 2008. 2 years down the track, you'd want to be expecting much more than that. Unfortunately if the lower expectation prevails, it will be reflected in the expectations of the players. The coaching changes over the off season were'nt the result of a simple "freshen up". The administration were unhappy with the direction of the coaching group and they made decisions that will ensure a change of methodology and direction.

Interestingly, Healy asked Swan what Ratten would need to achieve to retain his job. Swann stated that Carlton "would need to improve....possibly substantially". I like that. Good clubs expect success and with about 8 or 9 coaches coming out of contract in 2011, it's a buyers market.


Didn't hear the interview but that's reads as exactly where expectations should be. :thumbsup:


Yep, I think it has been the right approach in the past to hose down expectations.

However, I think our list is mature enough to accept greater expectations being placed on them. Right now, I'd rather aim high and fail, than aim low and succeed.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
keogh wrote:
I have taught kids in a low socio economic area for 20 years
The quality of the teacher makes very little difference to student achievement in this area.

Couldnt give a !@#$%& what research they say.

It comes down to motivation within the individual

You can make a difference but it is marginal

Ratten has the advantage of delisting players if they dont peform.


I'm sorry but that has not been my experience and I don't believe it's supported by research.

The teacher can make all the difference.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:27 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
cimm1979 wrote:
keogh wrote:
I have taught kids in a low socio economic area for 20 years
The quality of the teacher makes very little difference to student achievement in this area.

Couldnt give a !@#$%& what research they say.

It comes down to motivation within the individual

You can make a difference but it is marginal

Ratten has the advantage of delisting players if they dont peform.


I'm sorry but that has not been my experience and I don't believe it's supported by research.

The teacher can make all the difference.



A teacher with passion for learning can make all the difference.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ratten
PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
BlueRob wrote:
Ratten has done a fabulous job ... looking forward to his continued coaching at the CFC.




:smoking: :smoking:



You can keep throwing half volleys outside off stump BR but they're too wide to hit. :wink:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group