DocSherrin wrote:
Why does this concern you so much? C'mon guys - give me some answers! Why do you want Carlton to so desperately have 50,000 members?
I'm not entirely sure you're thinking this through.
For me it's mostly about bragging rights. Not an especially worthwhile goal, perhaps. However it is a very public measure of marketing success for the club, which could possibly provide spin-offs for the club; I'm not sure?
If other clubs are inflating their numbers with rubbish pet memberships (and I'm totally sure if they do or not) then I think we should too. The vast majority of people couldn't care less what type of category contributes to the "official" membership tally.
Aside from that I also like Doc's premise that not making 50K might embarrass the membership/marketing depts into working a bit harder/more effectively.
Although, membership is a pretty basic thing from a dollar and sense pov, either you want to be a member or you don't. I'm not sure there's any magic potions other clubs are offering that we're not.
For me, and I guess others, it's very much an emotional contribution. Living in Canberra, especially, it makes no sense from an economic position as I don't get value for money. I only get the silver 11 game home memberships for mrs camel and I. so it's not like I'm breaking the bank, but it's still nice to have that sense of belonging (whatever that is).
If we accept the club has several hundred thousand fans around the country/globe, it stands to reason, given the apparent success of other clubs, that we should easily get 50K members, probably a lot more.
But it's up to the club to evaluate the worth of a high membership tally and then, if they rate it highly enough, to make a solid effort to convert average fan into a member. An emotional attachment works fine for me, but it may not for others.
However, if the club's finances are truly sound, maybe it doesn't really matter how many members we have. It's grand final success and those Premiership Cups that count the most.