Sorry Hack but that is uninformed drivel. Do you think the TAC write a 'risk factor' for 2 or 3 Collingwood players being nabbed
In your own words Yoda "why let the facts get in the way of a good story?"
Fact - 1 sponsor only has dumped Tiger - Accenture ( a biz consultancy firm)
Tag Heur - has reduced advertising while the dust settles...but check their website....something like "TAG HEUR backs Tiger Woods" is up on display ATM
Gillette also have not dumped Tiger, just pulled his ads until the dust settles.[/quote]
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news- ... nine-yearsYou must have missed this one.
And to follow up as you suggested................
Razormaker Gillette announced Saturday it would phase him out of advertisements while he takes a break from golf, calling it a supportive move.
"As Tiger takes a break from the public eye, we will support his desire for privacy by limiting his role in our marketing programs," the company said, said without announcing a timetable for the resumption of use of the golfer's image.
AT&T, which backs the US PGA Tour operated by the golfer's foundation, said in a statement, "We are presently evaluating our ongoing relationship with him."
So far, most of Woods' ad sponsors are standing by him --
but The Nielsen Company found that despite their pledges of support, television ads featuring the golfer have mostly disappeared since the controversy began on Thanksgiving weekend.
Yep he's travelling smoothly.
Regards Cazzesman[/quote]
Read the GM article....the sponsorship was due to end in 09, and it is ending accordingly, they are not providing further sponsorship.
Hardly surprising whatever Tiger did as GM has had such bad financial trouble that they had to sell half the company for next to nothing recently to stay afloat.
Companies are temporarily pulling ads.....well FMD....laying low for a short time....but still Cazz.......facts are they are just pulling ads.... the facts are that he has not been dumped by most of his sponsors....whether it ties in with your story or not.
Tiger may or may not be travelling as smoothly as he would like, but your claims that all/most of his sponsors had dumped him were just plain inaccurate.
The guy still has more sponsorship $ coming his way than any other sportsman on the planet...so you need to worry more about what guys like Mitch may do to our brand than Tiger and his $billion empire having a hiccup
BTW how did Mitch go in his interview and Psych testing ?
For the 1st time you didn't trot out the usual spin "WH only recruits good kids", as you are normally quick to jump to all recruits defense....was there a problem with Mitch we chose to take a risk with when he "slipped" to #40.
You said he had a good 09....but he was found guilty of king hitting a bloke in the VFL, and now some more smoking guns in his 1st year....should be an interesting guy to follow