Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 10:55 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 ... 172  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:39 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7546
Location: NowHere.....
bondiblue wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
All good teams need a balance obviously but I would like Cunningham to get early go in the firsts thought he looked promising at the back end of last year

Jack and Curnow should also play

Back line Marchbank Weitering Plowman and Docherty should play as many games together as possible

Hopefully McKay and Pickett will push for selection


If Pickett picks up speed and gets a preseason under his belt, or good part of, I reckon he'd be picked round 1.
We haven't had a footballer with that speed since the 3 Amigos, and I think this kid moves faster.

IIRC he's been back running for a while now after foot surgery mid 2016 at the GWS. Maybe jogging, but its been a while.

From our club wesite:

Unfortunately in April this year Pickett suffered a foot injury keeping him sidelined for six months, however with another pre-season under his belt and his rehab complete, he’ll be ready to hit the track next season.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 7:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24758
Location: Bondi Beach
Based on recent form and of course how deep injuries cut Thomas is not best 22 imo.

I hope I'm wrong that he will continue to play lame.
He has proven natural talent.

No speed when fit. That's the current issue for mine.
I don't doubt his courage.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 7:40 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24758
Location: Bondi Beach
Lace Out wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
All good teams need a balance obviously but I would like Cunningham to get early go in the firsts thought he looked promising at the back end of last year

Jack and Curnow should also play

Back line Marchbank Weitering Plowman and Docherty should play as many games together as possible

Hopefully McKay and Pickett will push for selection


If Pickett picks up speed and gets a preseason under his belt, or good part of, I reckon he'd be picked round 1.
We haven't had a footballer with that speed since the 3 Amigos, and I think this kid moves faster.

IIRC he's been back running for a while now after foot surgery mid 2016 at the GWS. Maybe jogging, but its been a while.

From our club wesite:

Unfortunately in April this year Pickett suffered a foot injury keeping him sidelined for six months, however with another pre-season under his belt and his rehab complete, he’ll be ready to hit the track next season.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk



Music to my ear.

I was having a chat with many folk about Pickett and comparing him bla bla:

Quicker than Yarran
More wiring and zippy than Garlett
More elusive than Bettsy
Speed's out of trouble and creates goals in space. Doesn't need the tricks.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:01 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
Sin City wrote:
2017

Buckley Rowe Plowman
Docherty Marchbank Weitering Simpson
Kerridge Cripps Palmer
Silvagni Curnow Wright
Casboult McKay
Kreuzer Gibbs Murphy
Curnow Pick 5 Thomas/Boekhorst/Armfield/Cuningham


If McKay is ready to be best 22 next year, I'd be rapt. But given he missed this season with injury, I'm not so sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:04 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
bondiblue wrote:
I reckon Palmer will surprise a lot of Carlton supporters.

IMO best 18


I agree. I reckon he'll play a lot of footy for us over the next 3 years.

Which spells trouble for Graham and Whiley.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24758
Location: Bondi Beach
Stefchook wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I reckon Palmer will surprise a lot of Carlton supporters.

IMO best 18


I agree. I reckon he'll play a lot of footy for us over the next 3 years.

Which spells trouble for Graham and Whiley.


and Buckley Thomas Sumner and Lamb

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:20 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
Not sure he'll be competing with Buckley or Sumner, given their pace. Different roles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4623
Perhaps I'm not seeing something, but if we're not playing someone with a monster forward I can see Weiters, Plow, CM, Dockery, Simmo, Bucks in defence and Rowe forward a fair amount of time.
Agree on Palmer, spells the death knell for Whiley and Graham. Palmer, with all his faults, will be better than ordinary depth.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:51 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24758
Location: Bondi Beach
Stefchook wrote:
Not sure he'll be competing with Buckley or Sumner, given their pace. Different roles.


I'm just looking at the number of deck chairs we have and the quality of Palmer will bump one off, and Palmer will make up a part of a group of imports who will push those peripherals out.

AFL Quality vs VFL quality

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:32 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
Fair enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
I like your style Bill and Rowe up forward can't do as much damage as on the back line
Rowie has really done well with limited ability and if plays within his limitations is ok

The problem is when he makes a clanger it's a real doosy ie punch it into opposition goal square rather than the boundary line or fluffing chest mark etc played a good season overall last year but match against Essendon* DIABOLICAL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 2:43 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4623
frank dardew wrote:
I like your style Bill and Rowe up forward can't do as much damage as on the back line
Rowie has really done well with limited ability and if plays within his limitations is ok

The problem is when he makes a clanger it's a real doosy ie punch it into opposition goal square rather than the boundary line or fluffing chest mark etc played a good season overall last year but match against Essendon** DIABOLICAL


Ha...agree Frank...actually we have a running gag at the games that it must be in his contract...once he does something good (contested mark, out body and spoil etc) he has to have a huge clanger within 2 possessions....

He seems to be very committed to his contract :thumbsup:

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:17 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:41 pm
Posts: 979
bondiblue wrote:
Lace Out wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
All good teams need a balance obviously but I would like Cunningham to get early go in the firsts thought he looked promising at the back end of last year

Jack and Curnow should also play

Back line Marchbank Weitering Plowman and Docherty should play as many games together as possible

Hopefully McKay and Pickett will push for selection


If Pickett picks up speed and gets a preseason under his belt, or good part of, I reckon he'd be picked round 1.
We haven't had a footballer with that speed since the 3 Amigos, and I think this kid moves faster.

IIRC he's been back running for a while now after foot surgery mid 2016 at the GWS. Maybe jogging, but its been a while.

From our club wesite:

Unfortunately in April this year Pickett suffered a foot injury keeping him sidelined for six months, however with another pre-season under his belt and his rehab complete, he’ll be ready to hit the track next season.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk



Music to my ear.

I was having a chat with many folk about Pickett and comparing him bla bla:

Quicker than Yarran
More wiring and zippy than Garlett
More elusive than Bettsy
Speed's out of trouble and creates goals in space. Doesn't need the tricks.


Messi MKII?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:00 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
The snippets of him we have seen are very exciting ... I reckon we have picked up a gem.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
Based on potential, and my wish..
Simpson Weitering Plowman
Docherty Marchbank Brodie (pick5)
Kerridge Cripps Pickett
Wright McKay Smedts
SOJ CCurnow Battle (pick25)
Phillips Murphy ECurnow
From; Gibbs Cuningham Byrne Kreuzer
Emgs; Casboult Buckley Sumner Lamb
DFA; Richards or Towers..
Goodbye to the rest and thanks for your service....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
blueboy23 wrote:
Based on potential, and my wish..
Simpson Weitering Plowman
Docherty Marchbank Brodie (pick5)
Kerridge Cripps Pickett
Wright McKay Smedts
SOJ CCurnow Battle (pick25)
Phillips Murphy ECurnow
From; Gibbs Cuningham Byrne Kreuzer
Emgs; Casboult Buckley Sumner Lamb
DFA; Richards or Towers..
Goodbye to the rest and thanks for your service....

Cunningham, Gibbs surely are in the 18 at this stage

Barlow will be our Dfa and should play with palmer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:00 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24758
Location: Bondi Beach
london blue wrote:
blueboy23 wrote:
Based on potential, and my wish..
Simpson Weitering Plowman
Docherty Marchbank Brodie (pick5)
Kerridge Cripps Pickett
Wright McKay Smedts
SOJ CCurnow Battle (pick25)
Phillips Murphy ECurnow
From; Gibbs Cuningham Byrne Kreuzer
Emgs; Casboult Buckley Sumner Lamb
DFA; Richards or Towers..
Goodbye to the rest and thanks for your service....

Cunningham, Gibbs surely are in the 18 at this stage

Barlow will be our Dfa and should play with palmer


Totally agree about Gibbs and Cuningham.

Geez I hope we land DFA Barlow for 2 years whilst the next 2 drafts find their feet and are given time to develop.
I can't see the need other than depth for Towers and Richards if we have Battle Curnow and SOS (dangerous forwardline)

Reality is every one of the 22 are important.
I am one of the few with reservations about Sumner.
I look forward for him to have a huge preseason under his belt and see if that makes the difference between him being depth or 1st22.

I think a settled back 6 is what we are after with Simmo warming a spot for the next small backman. Byrne will be the BP or HBF.

I prefer to recruit Brodie for midfield development and support for Cripps on the inside.
Then add a FA to the midfield again next year along with our first draft pick, and that should give us a powerful inside and fast outside midfield.

Battle would be good as a permanent bona fide forward.
Kreuzer ahead of Casboult is the big decision. Kreuzer is more mobile. Either of those 2 would be the 3rd tall not FF or CHF.

I have high hopes for Boekhurst and think he's more important than Sumner Lamb

The success of a 66 game reset is looking highly likely.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
bondiblue wrote:
london blue wrote:
blueboy23 wrote:
Based on potential, and my wish..
Simpson Weitering Plowman
Docherty Marchbank Brodie (pick5)
Kerridge Cripps Pickett
Wright McKay Smedts
SOJ CCurnow Battle (pick25)
Phillips Murphy ECurnow
From; Gibbs Cuningham Byrne Kreuzer
Emgs; Casboult Buckley Sumner Lamb
DFA; Richards or Towers..
Goodbye to the rest and thanks for your service....

Cunningham, Gibbs surely are in the 18 at this stage

Barlow will be our Dfa and should play with palmer


Totally agree about Gibbs and Cuningham.

Geez I hope we land DFA Barlow for 2 years whilst the next 2 drafts find their feet and are given time to develop.
I can't see the need other than depth for Towers and Richards if we have Battle Curnow and SOS (dangerous forwardline)

Reality is every one of the 22 are important.
I am one of the few with reservations about Sumner.
I look forward for him to have a huge preseason under his belt and see if that makes the difference between him being depth or 1st22.

I think a settled back 6 is what we are after with Simmo warming a spot for the next small backman. Byrne will be the BP or HBF.

I prefer to recruit Brodie for midfield development and support for Cripps on the inside.
Then add a FA to the midfield again next year along with our first draft pick, and that should give us a powerful inside and fast outside midfield.

Battle would be good as a permanent bona fide forward.
Kreuzer ahead of Casboult is the big decision. Kreuzer is more mobile. Either of those 2 would be the 3rd tall not FF or CHF.

I have high hopes for Boekhurst and think he's more important than Sumner Lamb

The success of a 66 game reset is looking highly likely.

I'm with you brother

....surely sumner is priming himself for a big pre season. Can't afford to have him playing cameos in the fwd line.

.....boekhurst started 2016 really well until he had the wrist issue. Like sumner priming himself for a big pre season. We need both to be fit, fast, durable and capable of 20-25 possesions a game


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:37 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: The Clinic across the road.
Simmo Marchbank Plowman
Docherty Rowe Sheehan
C Curnow Cripps E Curnow
Smedts Caboult Weitering
Silvagni McKay Pickett
Phillips Gibbs Murphy
Palmer Wright Sumner Cuningham
Byrne in when fit
Only one ruck

_________________
"I'll tell you what I didn't do;
I never injected anyone."
AD 3/3/14


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2821
I'd like to see

FB Buckley Marchbank Plowman
HB Simpson Weitering Docherty
C Boekhurst Cripps Pickett
HF Sumner Casboult SOJ
FF Curnow McKay Murphy
Ruck Kreuzer Gibbs E Curnow
Int Cunningham Pick 5 Jaksch Wright


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 ... 172  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Back Seat Sniper, Google [Bot], sticksaftersiren87 and 118 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group