DocSherrin wrote:
Josh...you're full of shit.
I too am a little perplexed. Seems like a good initiative to me also. I could do without the 'networking' side of things, seems a little self-serving and of little benefit to the Club. The 'think tank' stuff though definitely piqued my interest - here we all are, screaming and squabbling every day about ideas and ways of improving things around the Club without any real avenue or voice, and along comes a vehicle (at least on paper) where these ideas can be heard.
Doc, I thought Josh responded quite articulately and was quite informative. You've slung back a 5 word retort which really doesn't enlighten us as to why this is a poor idea. Responding to questions with questions is also unhelpful. I'm usually with you 99% of the time, I think you've got a great business head on your shoulders and a good understanding of the way things work...when you choose to elaborate. This is one of those times.
Why is this a poor initiative?
1. Is it because you believe with the current board and administration that any attempt at pushing new ideas is futile?
2. Is it because the YCP Executive is comprised of 'old Carlton' which perhaps suggests a continuance of 'jobs for the boys (& girl)' and the same old ways of thinking? A junior version of our current setup, if you will?
3. Is it because the 'think tank' section of the YCP is by and large a pipedream and a shallow façade for what you perceive as a bunch of rich Carlton supporters grouping up to meet up at lavish events, pat each other on the back and compare bank balances?
Would this be a better idea if A) We had a new CEO/Pres/board and B) It was initiated by CFC supporters who weren't attached to old Carlton higher-uppers?
I'm at a bit of a loss here. Please feel free to expand on your "full of shit" remark with a bit more substance...I know you've got it.