Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:20 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
GWS wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
Right.

West Coast have signed who?
Hasn't free agency just been fantastic for Collingwood also?

flower rich clubs..


Free agency is just a piece of the puzzle. It is really just a new piece of the pu zzle...so discussing free agency is like discussing 5% of the issue. The big picture is in what has been done already. And the big picture is Carlton is in deep do-do. The media want you to believe it is all due to poor draft selections and nothing else. Carlton's problems all stem from poor drafting (all of its own making)..nothing else apparently.

At a poor club poor decisions are made to try and break the cycle.

The only teams not to make the top 4 since 2004..
Carlton
Essendon***
Melbourne and
Richmond...

Why is that the case? Is it all due to poor recruiting?

p.s I really hope Richmond leap into the top4 this year, but either way they will be cannon fodder for the 30 million $$ Hawthorn.


Or maybe the arrogance of the clubs with a born to rule mentality is providing a little interest payback in the karma stakes?

If we hadn't made such a @#$%&! mess of the draft and trade periods over the last twenty years and we'd put in place processes and systems to build a resilient organisation and still failed to make any impact on the top four then I think you might have a point worth pursuing but until we can prove that we're worthy of being anything other than a laughing stock for any significant period of time then aiming your venom at outside sources is purely empowering those prolonging our period in the dark ages.



I understand your viewpoint.

There are significant hurdles needed internally within the club.

However, what I would like to see is
a) if the AFL deems it is good enough for them to wipe out North Melbourne's debt via a series of grants, back-door payments etc...then it is good enough for them to wipe out Carlton's debt...or are all animals equal but some are more equal than others? With money, Carlton can then put more resources into recruiting, player welfare, membership (remember they didn't have enough money to man the phones earlier this year for membership)etc.

Or alternatively if they aren't going to do extra "dividends" payments to Carlton, then get North Melbourne to pay back to the AFL the money the AFL gave them. So too Port. Why did they deem North Melbourne's debt was more important to the AFL? Who deems this?


b) the "equalisation fund" that Carlton has to put money into that goes to other clubs. Carlton should not have to pay a cent for this scheme. This is an insane concept as it is once again piecemeal and ad-hoc and messy. Do we base "equalisation" on revenue or on where clubs have finished on the ladder over the last 15-20 years? what an insane idea. Socialism gone troppo...and believe me the AFL is operating as a quasi-socialist utopia.

c) the draw... why on earth would Carlton be scheduled to play Hawthorn twice? Who thought of this brilliant idea? Didn't the AFL realise that in the 2014 grand final they wiped the floor of the Swans...so scheduling Carlton to battle it out against Hawthorn twice is insanity. Maybe their execs missed the 2014 grand final as they were too busy bean counting and handing money hand over fist to GWS, North Melbourne, Port and other "project" teams and didn't get time to see the match. A reminder for the AFL - the match was over by the end of the 1st quarter. The Swans had Buddy Franklin, Kennedy, McVeigh and Jack in their team and they STILL got whipped by over 60 points by Hawthorn...and you schedule Carlton to meet this team twice? Why?

d) the AFL needs to change its perception of Carlton. I think this must be the reason why they continually funnel money into North, Port etc and bypass Carlton. They see Carlton as a "big club"... those days are over. 20 years of being humbled would surely change anyone with half a brain's opionion.

These are just logical first steps in what the AFL needs to do to write the wrongs. They also need to acknowledge that assistance is needed in the draft.

All of this will help as well as addressing the internal problems at Carlton you have mentioned.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:01 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
we have to start again ,new coach,new assisstants,new fitness and strength,and the most important the recruiting people MUST get this opportunity correct and i know we have been here before but going to the draft is the only way to start the rebuild hope sos gets it right .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:26 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
pew1 wrote:
we have to start again ,new coach,new assisstants,new fitness and strength,and the most important the recruiting people MUST get this opportunity correct and i know we have been here before but going to the draft is the only way to start the rebuild hope sos gets it right .


One good player per draft in the 1st or 2nd round isn't going to get the job done.

The AFL needs to give priority draft picks...they effectively gave GWS about 20 priority draft picks...giving Carlton, Melbourne and whoever else 2-3 extra draft picks this year and next..either in the 2nd or 3rd round if they deem it as an easy way to bypass the negative feedback- is a good first step.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17473
Location: Left Cuckistan
The Bears. I always knew it was the bears, even when I thought it was the immigrants I knew it was the bears.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 9:01 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Heavs wrote:
The Bears. I always knew it was the bears, even when I thought it was the immigrants I knew it was the bears.


:razz:

Immigants....

:wink:

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 9:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17473
Location: Left Cuckistan
Damn autocorrect

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 9:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1566
Navy One wrote:
Gotta hand it to Kruz ....... just keeps going and easily our best tonight followed by the Capt (congrats on 200)

Yes it was bad .... yes we got smashed (x 10000) by the best in the business .... and yes we played a lot of kids ... looking forward to the day when we beat Hawthorn .... it's been a long long time now and yes I was there when we kicked 30.30.210 against them (we still lost the premiership that year)



Kruse our best???? that is quite a stretch....simpson , murphy, Curnow(turns it over but gives everything),cripps and then daylight...maybe we were watching a different game

He will be like Waite ,,, will never fulfil he's talent as he still plays like its junior footy(see ball, get ball) , has no presence about him , will be lucky if he has more than 3 marks a game and this is before knee injuries.

but hey lets sign him up for 3 years and then when he's 30 we will move him on....

he is worth something right now on the trade table and he would be the first one I would trade as there would be clubs lined up to take him ,,,, but this club has no balls and we will sign him up and give him a minimum of $500k a year ....ahh the beauty of this club !! I look forward to more battering's like Friday night as we have no foresight only hindsight!!

_________________
#sayerscouldbetheman!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
The NRL always have more competitive seasons than us.

Reason- clubs can rebuild quickly with only a salary cap in place.

Scrap the draft for players that have 2 or more years experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 2:10 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Some perspective is needed. The competition is more even than ever. There are no longer any easy games. The grand equalisation plan has worked.
Most rate the swans as a highly successful team, yet they got flogged by the hawks as well. Clearly they are still a very good side, yet they were "off" on the day. It doesnt take much. Clearly we are not a great side, so already we are up against it. Add in that we played a lot of youngsters against a rampaging hawks side , and its not that difficult to understand the blow out.
Its no good wingeing that we have been hopeless at developing our young players and then when we play them , complain about their inability to compete with a very Confident top side like hawthorn.
This time last year , many were singing the praises of port. They had it right. They had the right coach, had recruited well, had developed their players. Yet where are they now? Not in contention. So was all that praise from last year incorrect? Or have they become victims of this even competition as well? It doesnt take much to turn it around because the difference between the top and bottom sides has been compressed. Clearly a swans outfit that got belted by the hawks, is not suddenly a side that has no coach , no good players , no ability to develop etc. They had an off day and they got belted. A team that is on paper very close to the hawks had a blow out loss. That tells me that the competition is very even. That the result on the day, more than ever before, depends on how the players are prepared for the game. Mentaly, physically. That these factors can overide years of development and recruiting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:27 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 148
Location: Melbourne
padre wrote:
There are no longer any easy games.


So what did Hawthorn just have?

_________________
Does anyone else find it a tad ironic that 2020 was the year we were hit by an event that no one saw coming?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Swindon Blue wrote:
padre wrote:
There are no longer any easy games.


So what did Hawthorn just have?

We just need to figure out a way to play ourselves.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
cimm1979 wrote:
Swindon Blue wrote:
padre wrote:
There are no longer any easy games.


So what did Hawthorn just have?

We just need to figure out a way to play ourselves.


I wouldn't like our chances at the moment.

It should be a club rule : the deficit >100 points the punches start.
Hawthorn must have loved their friendly practice run against us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
tap in 79 wrote:
AGRO wrote:
MPH78 wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Win lose or draw, Gold Coast are not going to damage their percentage too much.

Which is good for us. :wink:


Because this approach has really worked for us.



If we need to bend over some clubs in the up coming trade period we need pick 1 in the draft and the pre-season draft.

Whether or not our picks in the past have worked for us or not is largely irrelevant.

It's a bit like advertisements for managed superannuation funds, past performance is not a guarantee of future performance.


Back to one's faith in a draft pick to deliver us from the bottom...weren't we here 5 years ago with this same faith in one single draft pick to make all the difference. It is an 18 player team not a five player team...and even if it was a basketball team you need more than one good pick to turn around a sinking ship.

It won't happen. Carlton is a basket case and the AFL made Carlton a basket case. They also conversely made Hawthorn a superhero killing machine.

They have everyone feeding from the "we just need one more good draft pick trough"... really? Do people still believe in the magic egg?

The FACTS are that the AFL has created a two-tiered competition at the exact time they are asking Carlton to assist financially in its "equalisation program". Doesn't anyone see the irony in all of this? If it wasn't all so sad to see the destruction of a football club with over 150 years of history I would laugh.

So what the AFL wants is for Carlton - a team 5 million in debt and effectively the worst team in the competition - to put money into an AFL fund to help other clubs that are already richer and with better player rosters.

No one is joining the dots on the big picture. The AFL treats Carlton as their play-thing. A thing to be manipulated and squeezed out, wringing it out for all it is worth, flog it to death and leave it as empty carcass. But they gave Carlton all those Friday night games...surely this is proof the AFL really is interested in Carlton...hahaha. Funny stuff.

Meanwhile back at the happy team of Hawthorn - 25 million the richer thanks to the AFL donating Tasmania to them - they have all the funds, all the riches, and were given financial compensation to play at the MCG many years ago. The AFL created this indestructable Hawthorn and yet people still go on about their cleverness at getting Buddy Franklin and Roughhead as if that was all that was needed to create this team. People are so naive (not you Agro, or any poster here...I am just talking about the general football public.)

I am sure - after much conditioning - people believe it is all due to Carlton's "poor recruiting" that Carlton is in this position. Finances, money matters...even in the AFL's socialistically selective utopia. The "rich" club of Carlton must pay for its past crimes of being successful.



Stop giving Carlton an 'out'

We are in this mess because we have the worst recruitment record of all clubs

We can't recruit quality coaches (and there have been many out there if we'd looked properly)

We can't recruit quality players (we'd be a top 8 side if half our mistakes from 2004 onwards were playing now

We can't recruit quality admin...fancy US having a full salary cap (laughable) and idiotic coaches with an agenda...losing Betts, Garlett, Jacobs, Kennedy, Laidler

We can't recruit quality people to our board

We have ourselves to blame. period

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
chelodina wrote:
The NRL always have more competitive seasons than us.

Reason- clubs can rebuild quickly with only a salary cap in place.

Scrap the draft for players that have 2 or more years experience.



I agree with this point. Manly was second last on the ladder a week ago, and yet they still have a chance of making the finals.

In the AFL, nearly every match featuring the bottom four or five is a dead rubber and it is largely due to the AFL not doing enough to assist the clubs that have been down the bottom of the ladder for most of the last 10 years. Carlton, Melbourne, Brisbane all should get priority picks....but I am sure the AFL will just look at assisting Brisbane. Watch out for Brisbane alone getting the priority pick.

Once again the argument will be "Carlton is a rich club...they can fend for themselves" overlooking the fact Carlton is five million in debt as opposed to having 5-10 million plus in the bank like West Coast, Hawthorn and Collingwood. Yet again the carcass of Carlton is fed upon year after year.

North vs Brisbane - was the result of this ever really in doubt?
Carlton vs Hawthorn - was the result of this ever really in doubt?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 10:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Has there ever been a club with a more unhappy bunch of footballers this millennium?

That's an amazing environment we have created for our stock of young men..not only to excel in Footy but to thrive as young men
Its the same with the staffers..

Shit organisation

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 10:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
cimm1979 wrote:
Swindon Blue wrote:
padre wrote:
There are no longer any easy games.


So what did Hawthorn just have?

We just need to figure out a way to play ourselves.

this is a genius plan!

no more boring Friday nite games.
we'll be perfectly matched with our opponents.
the other team will be as shite and as great,
the coaches will be evenly matched.

bloody brilliant cimm. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:00 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 2867
Location: dudley!!!
Synbad wrote:
Has there ever been a club with a more unhappy bunch of footballers this millennium?

That's an amazing environment we have created for our stock of young men..not only to excel in Footy but to thrive as young men
Its the same with the staffers..

Shit organisation


welcome back, where ya been?

_________________
my last one was rubbish


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19391
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Patrick Keane ‏@AFL_PKeane

Nick Holman can accept 1 game for striking Luke Breust.
Josh Gibson can accept $1500, striking Blaine Boekhorst.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Effes wrote:
Patrick Keane ‏@AFL_PKeane

Nick Holman can accept 1 game for striking Luke Breust.
Josh Gibson can accept $1500, striking Blaine Boekhorst.


Mark Evans, Hawthorn till he dies.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18622
Location: threeohfivethree
So an intentional punch by an experienced thug in the guts of a first year player away from the play gets a fine whilst a clumsy spoiling attempt by a first year player gets a game?

Can't work out exactly why I dislike football so much these days but I'm sure this fits in somewhere...

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group