Synbad wrote:
no vitriol... the conversation on murphy was on the back of a join the dots sequence...you need to follow how it got there.....
btw,,, murphy has never handled the tag.....he used to be playing in the shadows of judds attention... its no accident hes not the player he used to be with judds decline..
wont be long before he gets back to shine more with the attention off him and on daisy as daisy blows the cobwebs off his game....
can be very useful can murph as second fiddle..
but there is no vitriol... it all gets back to the kind of 'idolatry' people have.. where u cannot criticise some of our stars... similar to the richmond syndrome.
effes and surrey plus OTHERS have bagged the crap out of daisy this year but dont like attention on anybody else.. even though its daisy that has had the least prep work or this season of anybody on our list bar the hapless carrazzo..
so how about some perspective going the other way???
No one's above criticism, clearly. Plenty on here were criticising Murph early on this season.
As they were criticising Daisy, Jeffy, Gibbs and so on.
My own view is that if you're criticising Murphy on last night's game you either didn't see the work he was putting in, or didn't want to see the work he was putting in. Sometimes you work hard and get a lot of the ball, sometimes you work hard and don't, but open the game up for others. The latter happened last night. The point being he busted his gut running both ways.
It seems with Murph there's a segment of the supporter base who believe that unless he gets 30 touches and kicks two goals every week he's failed as a leader of the club.