Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 3:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 2:58 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24658
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
from memory the dons weren't too upset he left, bcos of all his defensive shortcomings (they perceived).

he's a run and gun HB flanker. if we're getting the defensive shortcomings, lets cut him loose this finals and let him run.



It depends on who you talk too.
Bitter Effendope fans, or Dodoro and coaches.

Badly missed.

Was rumoured to be loose and not good one on one (by some fans) which he proved wrong from the moment he came to came to carlton.

Yes he's been caught out loose at stoppages a couple times this year, but holy jesus he has saved the day for his team mates and his team ad nauseum.
Some want to recall the few stuff ups. Maybe coz there's a handful, and its easy.

He was named all Australian HB. Nuff said.

and are you for real in your last sentence cutting Saad?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 3:05 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9566
Location: Australia
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
from memory the dons weren't too upset he left, bcos of all his defensive shortcomings (they perceived).

he's a run and gun HB flanker. if we're getting the defensive shortcomings, lets cut him loose this finals and let him run.



It depends on who you talk too.
Bitter Effendope fans, or Dodoro and coaches.

Badly missed.

Was rumoured to be loose and not good one on one (by some fans) which he proved wrong from the moment he came to came to carlton.

Yes he's been caught out loose at stoppages a couple times this year, but holy jesus he has saved the day for his team mates and his team ad nauseum.
Some want to recall the few stuff ups. Maybe coz there's a handful, and its easy.

He was named all Australian HB. Nuff said.

and are you for real in your last sentence cutting Saad?


Easy boy, whoa. He meant let him run through the midfield from defence, not get rid of him.

But tbh I also wondered the same thing when I first read his post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 3:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24658
Location: Bondi Beach
sinbagger wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
from memory the dons weren't too upset he left, bcos of all his defensive shortcomings (they perceived).

he's a run and gun HB flanker. if we're getting the defensive shortcomings, lets cut him loose this finals and let him run.



It depends on who you talk too.
Bitter Effendope fans, or Dodoro and coaches.

Badly missed.

Was rumoured to be loose and not good one on one (by some fans) which he proved wrong from the moment he came to came to carlton.

Yes he's been caught out loose at stoppages a couple times this year, but holy jesus he has saved the day for his team mates and his team ad nauseum.
Some want to recall the few stuff ups. Maybe coz there's a handful, and its easy.

He was named all Australian HB. Nuff said.

and are you for real in your last sentence cutting Saad?


Easy boy, whoa. He meant let him run through the midfield from defence, not get rid of him.

But tbh I also wondered the same thing when I first read his post.


:thumbsup:

My response was going to be...can let him run as a FP, as a HF, as a wingman...as a footballer, Saads better than any of the FP's HF's HB's ... and he'd be good in the midfield mix too.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 4:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6859
luckily you guys know i'd never petition to cut saad free.

cut him loose and let him run.


i noticed he grabbed his hammy twice (that i saw) on sunday ... maybe that's what's preventing those swashbuckling runs of his, not so much the coaches knocking it on the head?

either way in 2022/23 we looked unreal with him running thru the middle linking up with the mids on give-and-go's and spearing his left foot into charlie leading up the ball. that shit it is impossible to defend, just need to take the game on and take risks. and our coaching this year strikes me as really risk adverse?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2024 7:34 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:11 pm
Posts: 577
Fenwick Snap wrote:

Liking the newbies. Solid game from Binns, Moir really doesn't seem fazed by the big stage, and the Lord is good (sorry, won't do it again).



If loving the Lord is wrong, I don't wanna be right!

In other news:

I'm not mad at Kemp, I actually like him up forward. I'd back him in to slot the next match winner.

But Kennedy's miss on Sunday hurt my soul. He's usually Mr. Reliable. I'm also totally gay for him, which makes it even worse.



Sent from my SM-F731B using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:57 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6859
not that there's anything wrong with that!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 11:09 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24658
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:

just need to take the game on and take risks. and our coaching this year strikes me as really risk adverse?


Nail on head

No need to play safe on their home ground.
Will bite us on the bum in the last by umpires.

Take them on and let it rip.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 11:12 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
Braithy wrote:
moir looked more dangerous than the other 3 small forwards - durdin, motlop and owies. plus he can clunk a mark.

why on earth we went with durdin who squibbed it all arvy (until the final 15 mins), worried about popping his shoulder.


jeez our match committee is vexing with their choices. it's been the one constant in our last 20 years, too. inexplicable decisions.


that mark he clunked was a serious grab! he’s showing a lot and importantly started showing a bit more consistency playing 4 quaters in the VFL on the back straight.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 11:54 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
CK95 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
moir looked more dangerous than the other 3 small forwards - durdin, motlop and owies. plus he can clunk a mark.

why on earth we went with durdin who squibbed it all arvy (until the final 15 mins), worried about popping his shoulder.


jeez our match committee is vexing with their choices. it's been the one constant in our last 20 years, too. inexplicable decisions.
Could not agree more. Ashton should have been in the 22

And why did Carroll get subbed? I thought he was going well. I would have subbed off durdin or motlop

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


Carol was playing more in the middle (inside wing role?) than forward, which is what Ashton seemed to be playing. Might have beenDecided before the game. Durds was so good against WC that probably saved him and Owies had done just enough to stay on. Agree that Carol was doing alright. As good as Dow I reckon, and better than Stoker who was trying to contain (blanket) Cripps and barely got a disposal for himself will giving up a lot to Crippa (before Stoker was subbed off injured,ironic given that he was hanging off Cripps’s sholders for half the game).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 11:58 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24658
Location: Bondi Beach
diesel95 wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
moir looked more dangerous than the other 3 small forwards - durdin, motlop and owies. plus he can clunk a mark.

why on earth we went with durdin who squibbed it all arvy (until the final 15 mins), worried about popping his shoulder.


jeez our match committee is vexing with their choices. it's been the one constant in our last 20 years, too. inexplicable decisions.
Could not agree more. Ashton should have been in the 22

And why did Carroll get subbed? I thought he was going well. I would have subbed off durdin or motlop

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


Carol was playing more in the middle (inside wing role?) than forward, which is what Ashton seemed to be playing. Might have beenDecided before the game. Durds was so good against WC that probably saved him and Owies had done just enough to stay on. Agree that Carol was doing alright. As good as Dow I reckon, and better than Stoker who was trying to contain (blanket) Cripps and barely got a disposal for himself will giving up a lot to Crippa (before Stoker was subbed off injured,ironic given that he was hanging off Cripps’s sholders for half the game).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Carroll did play forward and mid. He played at FF, right in the square, at times.

Silly decision to play Durdin, and I don't think he squibbed anything. His shoulder was not working. ie no strength in it.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 12:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
Braithy wrote:
The_Cranium wrote:
I just keep replaying that final D50 stoppage in my mind. The break down of the structure. There was one little cauliflower on that team that could manage that... and we came off him. I haven't watched the replay and won't, but does anyone know who had him? Was it Cowan? Sucked into the contest... this club invents ways to hurt its fans. It's incredible. Not watching the freo v port game. I just don't care. Part of me just wants the pain to end now. Port win... whatever. We go to Brisbane and hope Brisbane kick themselves out of it. Freo win... whatever. They can't hurt me anyone this year. @#$%&!



i'm pretty sure higgins was saad's guy.


Yep, Matthew Lloyd enjoyed running the super wide-angle shot from behind goal to highlighting how Saad went goal side of the pack and just stood their waiting for a handball out of the pack presumably. (from either side) And his man, the most dangerous Saints small forward in the game to that point, Higgins, went to the outside (towards the wing) and it was dished out to him as they’d been doing all game.

Lloyd has played that vision from countless other games, once it was Walsh who lost his man. Forget the others, good players — badly coached.

Here’s a novel idea for 2025. Make Hamill the Forwards coach and find a defender to coach defence.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 12:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
Mickstar wrote:
redback wrote:
keogh wrote:
I thought it was a fantastic effort
To all those supporters who are giving it to Kemp get [REDACTED]
The guy tries his body is reliable
Yeah he missed but he kept Wilkie quiet
I would pick him before McGovern Williams and Martin combined
Regardless of the results over in the West today showed we have 3 players who will help us next year
Moir Binns and Lord look the goods
Our bottom 6 let us down
These 3 guys will help
The effort was 100% magnificent with so many injuries
Cripps is an all time great
Go Blues



totally agree


I"m happy for the skipper . He really is magnificent . Good stuff Trev . And on top of that Cripps , Durds , Weiters , Washy , and Acres WENT into the game sore . All were very preppy for the entire game and should be commended for there doggedness under extreme duress . We are playing in the finals . We got a lucky bounce you might say . And to top it off we have unearthed some kids . Binns and Lord finished better than they started . Worked into the game beautifully and were instrumental when it counted in the last quarter . I watched a lot of Moir in the Magoo's and he was nowhere near it , BUT , he had something about him . Some blokes for some unfathomable reason perform better at the higher level and it seems Moir is one of those .


Agree, even Voss said publicly Moir isn’t set up for 4 quarters of AFL yet. In reserves he is patchy to say the least, but has X factor alright and has done more per miniute on ground than Fantasia this year. Having said that thought Fantasia played his best game for us against Saints. I know they say he does heaps off the ball, I’m just talking about what we see on the replay.l


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 12:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
17th Premiership wrote:
From what I saw of the Owies tackle, he pinned both arms and dragged him down in one motion rather than threw him forward with a second motion. If anything, to me, it seemed that Higgins threw his own head down. And clearly, he was able to continue playing - maybe, the argument is that he never would have nailed the match winning goal if he was fully conscious???
However, given the current environment, I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets suspended. Not sure if that would be for one week or three.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


I reckon billings was milking it with the head toss forward… just my opinion, I’m no bio-mechanist. Collingwood got thuglife off much worse for a Grand Final appearence he never should have made.

Speaking of which, when St Kilda were on the fast break that lead to the Phillipou behind in the final quater, Wanganeen Milera was running at one of our defenders (looked like Saad on the reply but no-idea really) and our defender jumped to prevent a forward handball (which rarely works, players a too well practiced at that forward handball over) and 5 seconds later Wanganeen Milera was running past the receiver of his HB and streamed into our D70 with an easy pass to Phillipou.

I’m not saying we should risk life-long injury or acquired brain injury to opposition players, but if he’d ran at Milera instead of a standing jump and connected enough to slow him down or stop him we outnumbered the HB receiver and would have won the ball back.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 12:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
bondiblue wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
moir looked more dangerous than the other 3 small forwards - durdin, motlop and owies. plus he can clunk a mark.

why on earth we went with durdin who squibbed it all arvy (until the final 15 mins), worried about popping his shoulder.


jeez our match committee is vexing with their choices. it's been the one constant in our last 20 years, too. inexplicable decisions.
Could not agree more. Ashton should have been in the 22

And why did Carroll get subbed? I thought he was going well. I would have subbed off durdin or motlop

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


Carol was playing more in the middle (inside wing role?) than forward, which is what Ashton seemed to be playing. Might have beenDecided before the game. Durds was so good against WC that probably saved him and Owies had done just enough to stay on. Agree that Carol was doing alright. As good as Dow I reckon, and better than Stoker who was trying to contain (blanket) Cripps and barely got a disposal for himself will giving up a lot to Crippa (before Stoker was subbed off injured,ironic given that he was hanging off Cripps’s sholders for half the game).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Carroll did play forward and mid. He played at FF, right in the square, at times.

Silly decision to play Durdin, and I don't think he squibbed anything. His shoulder was not working. ie no strength in it.


yeah you’re right, I did see him goal square. mid you even Acres goes goal square (forward) sometimes playing a true wing role.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 12:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:

just need to take the game on and take risks. and our coaching this year strikes me as really risk adverse?


Nail on head

No need to play safe on their home ground.
Will bite us on the bum in the last by umpires.

Take them on and let it rip.


was it just coincidence that when our pressure and risk taking went up in the third quater we started winning free kicks and taking uncontested marks in the F50?

I guess the point is it takes a big toll on players doing that for 20 H&A games. And it’s hard to run out games giving up so much energy chasing down players you probably wont catch before they dispose of the ball.

Voss and CFC have every single player talking up the “if we bring the pressure and defensive mindset for four quarters we know we’re a good chance in any game”. So why is it so had to do it? What are oppositions doing that makes it impossible for us to sustain that mindset and action-set for 4 quaters week-in andWeek-out, whomever the 22 selected are, any decent player can run and tackle and man-up and zone-up when required if he/she sets their Mind To It.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 12:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
Braithy wrote:
not that there's anything wrong with that!


::applause::


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 2:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14256
Location: Sydney
diesel95 wrote:
[]

I reckon billings was milking it with the head toss forward… just my opinion, I’m no bio-mechanist. Collingwood got thuglife off much worse for a Grand Final appearence he never should have made.


It's @#$%&! unbelievable, isn't it. The contortions they went through to "not spoil" the finals by denying Maynard his rightful place. He ended a man's career, possibly seriously compromised his future health! "But it was a football action"... then what the @#$%&! was Owies's tackle? What was Jones's?

"Would be a shame for Antivax to miss his finals chance after all this time"
"Would be a shame to ban DANGER!! he speaks so eloquently"
"Would be a shame for Big Tough Maynard not to bring his Big Tough Play to the finals"
"Meh, it's just Little Matthew Owies from (spit) Carlton, HANG HIM"

@#$%&! YOU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 3:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35643
Location: Half back flank
They owies us an apology for this.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 3:15 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
CK95 wrote:
They owies us an apology for this.



Can you please ban yourself for that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 28, 2024 4:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35643
Location: Half back flank
:lol:

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], harker and 95 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group