Wangers wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Wangers wrote:
KJ has no one to blame but himself. You don't suddenly decide to give up the grog, night outs, etc in your final year of your contract and expect the club to re contract you. Deserved to be delisted. It would have been a joke to tell other clubs KJ is available for a trade let alone a 3rd rounder, Rod!!
The football world is filled with young men who've made a mistake, or even made several, only to be educated and provided with re-teaching, support, opportunities and a vision for what their contribution can look like in a successful team etc.
You must must've be such a paragon in your circle of influence with your elevated standards and demonstrative self righteousness. Good on you. May I have the honour just to touch your robes??
Listen champ, I'd rather trust those in charge at the club making the decisions. I know what high performance environments look like and if my club makes a call on a player not worth putting on the trade table, then so be it. Thankfully you're not running the show in list management at CFC.
There's a difference. The club delisted a player. You're making assertions that he delisted because he was on the grog, late nights etc.
Thats what shits me with these rumours. nck posted a couple of months ago about KJ being out late one night. When I followed up asking if he was drinking or how late he was out, no reply. No substantiation.
See, I think if you're going to gob off on about a player and sully his reputation, there is an onus on you to back it up.
Because someone posts an unsubstantiated rumour about a player, suddenly other posters claim he's out on the town all the time and hitting the piss. Hell, Dane even believes it because "he's passionate about it"

Lets not worry about the facts!
So no, you're not backing in the club and its reasons because you don't know what they are. You're backing a poster who drops hand grenades, wipes his hands and walks away when challenged to back up his story. Theres a big difference between the 2.