Player Ratings from Final siren. just as an objective measure (nowhere near perfect, but an index)
Players down from 2011
Murphy- 111 v 85 down 23%
Judd- 100 v 82 down 18% (end of career)
Gibbs- 105 v 90 down 14%
Betts- 69 v 57 down 17% (injured/suspended)
Yarran- 72 v 58 down 19%
Jamison 56 v 50 down 11%
Scotland- 99 v 82 down 17% (injured/end of career)
Warnock- 74 v 68 down 8%
Simpson- 95 v 83 down 13%
Robinson- 92 v 74 down 19%
Carrazzo- 92 v 63 down (32%) (injured and end of career)
Players about the same
Waite 72 v 71 (injured/end of career)
Garlett 72 v 73
Players that have improved
Brock Mclean 66 v 87 up 32%
Ed Curnow 72 v 76 up 5%
Walker 76 v 85 up 12%
aRMFIELD- 51 V 57 up 12%
Henderson- 52 v 72 up 39%
Tuohy 54 v 44 up 25%
Lucas- 70 v 59 up 19%
Cachia- 0 v 68
I think both Simpson's and Walker's numbers maybe anomalous because they are playing different roles this year, but the rest are about right.
Basically, you are concentrating on the Murphy's and Gibbs' in terms of your assessment, but others certainly have improved (but not enough to account for the drop in output from Murphy and Judd). The criticism of Malthouse should be about why he hasn't blooded more offensive midfielders.
This post may not show the 'intelligence' that you require, but it does deliver one objective measure for anyone to assess the coach.
Blue Vain wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Blue Vain, you seriously think the current group of players can win a flag?
Take your meds
What are you on about?
I dont think we're anywhere near a premiership side with grandpa at the helm.
If you're going to take shots at me, at least try to place a hint of intelligence into it.
What I do know is this list has the ability to play finals if our players are anywhere near their best. Have a look through the team at the moment. Judd, Murphy, Carrazzo, Betts, Yarran, Warnock, Jamison, Garlett, Robinson, Gibbs etc
All playing well below their best at the moment. Some coming toward the latter part of their career, some just coming into their prime. Why are they not playing well?
Why are they shadows of the players they were 2 years ago?
The coaches role is to have as many players performing at their optimum as possible. Ours are nowhere near it. Posters here can throw them on the scrap heap but there are players in that list who have been multiple All Australians, coaches award winners, top 3 in the Brownlow. High level performers.
Why are they all playing poorly? Whats the common denominator?
Its Pagan all over again. A bloody minded attitude to make a list adapt to a coaches style instead of the coach assessing the list and developing a game style based on their strengths. Malthouses disciple, Mark Neeld did exactly the same at Melbourne and look where they are now.
Thats where the same bloody minded stupidity is sending us.
Enjoy the ride.