Travis Cloke for $5m over 5yrs: NO!!!

camel · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:41 pm

Pretty simple this one and if the poll doesn't go the way I expect it to I think I will have a meltdown. :lol:

I don't want Travis Cloke under any circumstances. But IMO $5m over 5 years is just so bloody stupid it does not warrant discussion.

#SayNoToCloke

Wojee · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am **Posts:** 35317

DO NOT WANT!!!

buzzaaaah · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am **Posts:** 17897

You'd have to know how it'd affect the salry cap and whether we'd need to offload to fit him. We'll lose Bower, Thornton and Russell potentially. There's a million if you replace them with draftees
I'm voting no but with caveats that it may end up being the right thing to do depending on circumstances

bluechucky · **Joined:** Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am **Posts:** 13703

Yeah why not. Might as well @#$%&! this club over good and proper.

CK95 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:50 pm

DON'T want, but geez this meltdown sounds tempting...how many times can you vote out of interest? :lol:

KernaHam Sandwich · **Joined:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:28 am **Posts:** 11

Is there a better way to deliver your first post in TalkingCarlton than with a big fat NO for this question.

Taking Cloke for such a ridiculous amount would be as ludicrous as taking Fev back for nothing. We have a couple of younger blokes that we can mould in the Carlton image in Casboult and Mitchell and then there is big Sam Rowe just itching to get back and show us all what he is made of.

Cloke is bad news, just like Malthouse.

ThePsychologist · **Joined:** Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am **Posts:** 7893

I wouldn't pay $5

Adelaide Blue · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:57 pm

So you are all saying no to an extra 50 goals a year?
Let's just keep going the way we are and maybe we will make 9th next year!!

MPH78 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:03 pm

Hell No.

Braithy · **Joined:** Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm **Posts:** 7473

That contract would be a cap killer.

Noonamah Blue · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:05 pm

NO at that price.

madblue21 · **Joined:** Wed Aug 25, 2010 7:27 pm **Posts:** 764

chubbyruss · **Joined:** Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am **Posts:** 8633

Wouldn't want the

that comes with him

AGRO · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:13 pm

Boak I thought you said Boak, can you change mine from a Yes to a No. :razz:

camel · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:15 pm

Adelaide Blue wrote:

So you are all saying no to an extra 50 goals a year?
Let's just keep going the way we are and maybe we will make 9th next year!!

50 goals a year?! :lol:

Since he made his debut in 2005 this is the list of players who have topped Collingwood's goal kicking...

2005 – Tarrant (36)
2006 – A Rocca (55)
2007 – A Rocca (54)
2008 – Medhurst (50)
2009 – Anthony (50)
2010 – Didak (40)
2011 – Cloke (69)
2012 – Cloke (45 so far)

Over his whole career he averages 1.58 goals per game. That's less than 40 goals a year.

Handy, but not worth one million bucks a year?! :eek:

He's just not worth the rumoured pay packet in output or what it would be doing to our list management over the next 5 years.

Scotty12000 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:21 pm

Adelaide Blue wrote:

So you are all saying no to an extra 50 goals a year?
Let's just keep going the way we are and maybe we will make 9th next year!!

Everyone used that argument when we gpt rid of Fev that we'd lose his 50-80 goals a year...we ended up scoring more without him. It's not as simple as taking one number and placing it somewhere else. Brisbane played that maths game with Fev and J. Brown - even without his indiscretions it was never gonna work that way.

Yes to Cloke $3-3.5m for 5 years, no to $5m. I'm sure in a new environment he'll find his way. It's purely a money thing in relation to the cap for mine and despite his 'poor' season, he has taken marks and still kicked goals.

Bolt from the Blue · **Joined:** Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:18 am **Posts:** 1900

If we were going to give $1m to somebody I would rather it be someone who has been serving our club for a few years now and could be a future captain in Marc Murphy thanks.
Cloke isn't worth $1m imo either.

SA Blue · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:24 pm

Salary cap pressures aside.

Yes

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:24 pm

We need to fix our forward line if we head into 2013 relying on Betts Garlett , Waite Walker Casboult Hampson again we have total rocks in our head as the only one who can be relied on is Betts and he should be icing not the be all and end all . I'm not saying Cloke is the answer but you know what you get he fronts up every week and puts in - doesn't always come off for him but it is not through the want of trying . Our blokes turn up one week and go missing for the next 2 .

We need something to build a forward line around if thats Cloke than so be it - If it is some else then good on them also - but what we have now is nothing short of rubbish

kingkerna · **Posted:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:31 pm

half the cost and I'll consider it

Travis Cloke for $5m over 5yrs: NO!!!

Who is online