Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 4:42 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: TC - HyperCritical
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1331
Well I have been reading over posts this week and is it me - or is there a distinct air of Hypercriticism going on the TC site? The Houlihan hammering, the Carrazo mauling..... and the list goes on....

Whilst I can accept posters are peeved with our lucklustre performaces so far this season, I cannot understand for the life of me why there appears to be such ridiculous criticisms of late. Is it just for the sake of it? :roll:

Perspective 1: OK we won the Wizzer - nice work YAY!! - did that mean we were going to be red hot favourites for the eight in the 'real stuff'? Come on - let common sense prevail.....

Our team is still, at the end of the day a team of foot soldiers. What is it someone said about "A team of champions as opposed to a "champion team"? Clearly we don't fall into either category as yet. Our list is being reborn - we have kids - we have some experience to help them, but the simple fact is mistakes are going to creep into the way we play. Mistakes like those that have seen us seemingly let winnable games in North & Collingwood slip away....

Perspective 2: Three games into the season and how in all honesty, how many good quarters of footy do you think we have played? IMO its only one good quarter in three games! That of course being the last quarter against the Bummers. One good quarter in three games has resulted in one win, but more importantly the losses have not been shellackings - clearly this is a sign of improvement from last year. This season we have played shit but have not copped hidings - Last season when we played shit - we scored three 100 plus point beltings!! I believe this to be a significant point.....

The Fev & Lance show: Clearly the most dominant players in the Wizzer - but come H&A time and its a bit of a fizzer show....

Perspective 3: Fev & Lance were getting superb service from the midfield in Wizzer, H&A I dont believe this to be the case. Again I would point to the vaguries of having a young list, and a team of foot soldiers - not champions as possible reasons. Does this mean we should bag them? Be hypercritical of them??

I could keep going on my tirade but I think or at least hope the points I have raised have got accross.

I will finish on this Note....

"Keep the faith and you shall be rewarded"

GO BLUES!! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
A combination of heightened expections and bone picking I would suspect

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17892
Unfortunately after a loss, you will always have people looking for a scapegoat. Usually they will condemn a whole career on the basis of a single game, quarter or even kick. There is nothing wrong with criticism but the hysteria in the past 2 weeks is ridiculous

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
I guess there's a fine line between blatant shit-stirring and constructive criticism that some peopl have trouble defining.

I reckon this community has always been reasonably good at self-regulation, and whenever someone steps over the line they normally get shot down fairly quick smart.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:35 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
tend to agree with the general consensus here.

the conversation though is pretty healthy and gives us a pretty good perspective of where we are at.

IMO - winning the wizard cup wasnt what built up the expectations, it was the way that we went about it that did.

We where all hoping and expecting that to continue into the real season, it hasnt, we have played 1/4 out of 12 the way we did in the wizzer and we run amock.

We are still a young side and alot of improvment is yet to come, however, the overall positive for me to date, is the fact that while we havent played anywhere near our best, we have still been in the hunt for vast majorities of the game. Infact, if it wasnt for the incredibly acciracy that the opposing teams have kicked against us, i dare say we could reasonably be 2-1 if not 3 - 0 and then it would be a completly different spectrum on this website.

but time will tell

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Its been a little Ricmondesque around here.

Thats ok, we'll reserve a spot on the wagon for those people and when we win they'll be welcome to take their place in their seat.

There will be knowing look amongst the rest of us behind their back :D

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
:roll:

The difference is, our criticism is informed.

Sorry, I forgot players were beyond our critique, because they wear Navy Blue.

As far as massive overreactions go, this thread is daylight in front of any criticism of players posted here.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:04 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
The Tyrant wrote:
:roll:

The difference is, our criticism is informed.

Sorry, I forgot players were beyond our critique, because they wear Navy Blue.

As far as massive overreactions go, this thread is daylight in front of any criticism of players posted here.


I don't think any of this is aimed at you Tyrant, rather the 'who should we give the arse' type threads. Your Carrots thread was awesome debate - how can we make a good kid better type stuff, and focussed on positives rather than negatives...

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
If anyone makes an outlandish statement about a particular player they will get picked apart fairly quickly if that criticism is based just on emotional reasons.

Constructive criticism is good, and even unconstructive criticism is OK (as long as it is challenged). There are enough people on here with an in depth knowledge of the players and the game plan that the board does not reduce to a flame war or endless negative rants.

This is a great board, the balance between positive and negative is never going to be perfect, but the balance has been pretty good, even considering a loss to Collingwood.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Last edited by Jarusa on Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Its been a little Ricmondesque around here.


You think it's bad here, you should see what's been written lately at another unofficial forum.....(you know what I'm talking about)

I agree with Tyrant. We can't excuse bad performances just because they wear Navy Blue.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
BRMW has actually named Carrazzo though. Not a single person in here has said "Carrazzo is shit... delist him"... but rather, the "hypercritical" ones have said "the guy can't kick, and he's at a delicate stage of his career... and, because we see him as a big part of the future, we have to send him a message about it."

Part of his "professional development plan". We can either try him in new positions... put the heat on MORE to speed the improvement, or get him out of the team to work on it.

We're not playing for a premiership, we're playing for growth.

No one has lost any faith. We're all just trying to get the right sort of growth going.

Criticism (learning from mistakes) is the best way to grow... and you don't encourage someone's growth by heckling them. We're no doing that. We might use creative titles and throw away lines to make our points (such is the domain of the net-critic).. but... to me....... this thread is just smoke blowing.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Sooooo.........

is being positive.....a negative........?

cos i know being negative......is not being
positive........!

actually if being negative...is not positive.....
then i suppose being positive...is not being
negative...........!

there ya go......i've arnswered my own question....
sorry about that......!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1331
Deano Supremo wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
:roll:

The difference is, our criticism is informed.

Sorry, I forgot players were beyond our critique, because they wear Navy Blue.

As far as massive overreactions go, this thread is daylight in front of any criticism of players posted here.


I don't think any of this is aimed at you Tyrant, rather the 'who should we give the arse' type threads. Your Carrots thread was awesome debate - how can we make a good kid better type stuff, and focussed on positives rather than negatives...


Tyrants - Deano is right - thread was not aimed at you personally or anyone in else in particular

The use of the carazzo debate in retrospect was probably a mistake, however I will still stand by my point that some reactions were misguided.

In general the point of my post was to give some perspectives of where I think the CFC are at - and perhaps bringing in the bigger picture rather than identifying individual situations.

I also agree that in general criticism is informed on this site - and I certainly dont believe players that wear the navy blue are beyond criticism - but I believe some perspective is worthwhile considering when doing so.

At the end of the day I love this club and I want it to succeed as much as anyone else. At the same time - I am willing to endure some hardship along the way, because I firmly believe that all the hardship we will endure as a team will be worthwhile for what is to come in the future when the CFC becomes a premiership contender again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Really, threads like this are more damaging than the level of criticism on this site, because they discourage healthy debate

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
I don't think it's discouraging healthy debate, but rather discouraging unnecessary shitcaning.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Deano Supremo wrote:
I don't think it's discouraging healthy debate, but rather discouraging unnecessary shitcaning.


of which there's been none

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:30 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
The Tyrant wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
I don't think it's discouraging healthy debate, but rather discouraging unnecessary shitcaning.


of which there's been none


APart from personal attacks against Tyrant


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1331
The Tyrant wrote:
Really, threads like this are more damaging than the level of criticism on this site, because they discourage healthy debate


Tyrants you said
Quote:
We're not playing for a premiership, we're playing for growth.


Which is one of my points in my post :
Quote:
Our list is being reborn


I am not sure what you mean - as I have explained I have written what my perspective is on where the CFC is at and yet that is damaging??

If you dont agree with my perspectiove then explain why - then we have a debate - otherwise you are simply contradicting yourself.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
The Tyrant wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
I don't think it's discouraging healthy debate, but rather discouraging unnecessary shitcaning.


of which there's been none


I think campo was the subject of both constructive criticism and straight out abuse this week.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Look

There'll always be supporters who say "sack David Clarke... he's crap" etc etc.

And, there'll be threads about who we should delist and how we should trade at round 3.

Those threads aren't for everyone. I personally don't read them. But, there is a population of supporters who like them, and they shouldn't be stopped just because some of us idealogically oppose those threads, because really that's just debate disguised as (what some of us would call) "shitcanning".

"Woe, some supporters are more negative than me" is fine, but they're not WRONG for it. Some Carlton supporters are poorly educated, couldnt' spell Koutoufides, and are uglier than me... I wouldn't go on and diminish their right to support carlton by yelling out "GO COOPERFIDIES".

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 125 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group