tamerlane wrote:
keogh wrote:
A few observations
Regulars
Russell
Cloke
Wiggins
Bentick
Are IMO not up to it and have had enough time to show it
I reckon the first 3 I can mount a strong enough case for that
Bentick is a great tackler and gutsy but is too slow and too poor a kick and he wont get better at both particularly in the pace department.
Pace and kicking are really important in the modern game as opposed to 30 years ago . They were important then too just not as much
I dont agree with any of those to be honest, Bentick and Russel havent had enough of an opportunity yet in my opinion, I know they have both had a few years, but years in a poor team without the support and 40 or 60 odd games is still low. I still think they both have too much potential and should continue to play. I think Cloke is done as a No.1 ruckman, but still has potential as a forward and a back up around the ground ruck. Wiggins is the only one who im not sure about, but i think he still should be tried for the rest of the year, but i think you could be right on him (now off to hide from the rest of the forum)
I agree with Keogh, the names listed are people just filling the holes until others mature and take them over, none have showed they will be stars or that they are vital cogs in the team structure. Once we get a decent ruckman Cloke won't be needed, he isn't a strong forward and he would be to slow down back, don't get me wrong I love the way he goes about it but he just is a gap filler, bentick is the same, does get in and do the itty gritty stuff but I think if someone else was given that role they could do it better. How many chances does Russell need, once he gets 100 games will that be enough to drop him, i would probably not delist him straight away but send him to the bullants for a month or two. Now Wiggins is ify, he is a great mark and gutsy, something we don't have up forward, I would leave him there until someone is moulded into the same game plan.