keogh wrote:
You know
It’s hard to believe a review is needed
Look at the one constant in all this
It’s called window dressing
What shits me with you keogh, is the club is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't because the past can't be erased in your head.
Reminds me of an old girlfriend who never gets over the break up.
Its a review. All business and sporting clubs do it all around the world.
And the Board is slowly changing, and I know, even if the names changed on the Board, you would still be whinging with, I told you so, or its a farce because the body in control of the club is still called The Board and not Binary.
I am rapt to be having a Review of the Assistants, the Conditioning Dept, the psychs, the real decison makers who make recommendations to The Board. These are the answers we want answered and addressed.
Most scribes in the Media, with the exception of Robbo and his Newscorp 'yes Robbo' men, Whateley, Ralph and keogh, think the List is fine. Maybe one two or three players short. I bet the doomsdayers, anti carlton linchmob will all back track too when we have the Football Dept, including Game Plan upgraded to an elite standard ie sharpen the edges, get an unconditional brand of footy and weed out the passengers, which only a Review can do. Sacking the Coach isn't what's needed now. I want the football Dept fixed so its fit for purpose. Football first. Politics second. Even if politics is going fine, we will still need Football Dept sorted.
Having a Review of the Football Dept is a good thing and a step in the RIGHT direction, and the timing couldn't be better. Agree with this last line?
There is no point in having a review if you don’t get to the bottom as to why we are 14 th 6 years into a rebuild and why we have been absolute garbage for 17 of the last 20 years of equalization.
And who decided to trade or get with free agency the players on our list who are under performing
And what roll the board plays or anyone else besides the List Management team in these decisions being made