Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:53 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3474 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 ... 174  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 8:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 33644
Location: Half back flank
My Geoff Walsh anecdote from the 90s :lol: :lol:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=30845&p=1206406&hilit=geoff+walsh#p1206406

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 8:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 16655
Location: Left Cuckistan
CK95 wrote:
Also the panel should be keogh, Heavs, & CC1961

Sent from my SM-A115F using Tapatalk

Recommendations:
1. Whatever the premiers are doing in 2024 we should be doing now
2. Lobby the AFL for retrospective drafting
3. This one is in a different color (I'm too lazy to do it)
4. Simon Wiggins was pretty @#$%&! good hey, maybe we should give him a ring, get him back round the boys
5. Shouldn't we just give BV a ring, he's the only one on here who actually gets modern footy.
6. Maybe put a Jewish stocktake through that new extension at Princes Park?
7. Is the rollercoaster still an option?
8. I know he's a meme, but maybe give the Scott brother who used to coach Norf a call

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 8:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 17150
Location: threeohfivethree
Heavs wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Also the panel should be keogh, Heavs, & CC1961

Sent from my SM-A115F using Tapatalk

Recommendations:
1. Whatever the premiers are doing in 2024 we should be doing now
2. Lobby the AFL for retrospective drafting
3. This one is in a different color (I'm too lazy to do it)
4. Simon Wiggins was pretty @#$%&! good hey, maybe we should give him a ring, get him back round the boys
5. Shouldn't we just give BV a ring, he's the only one on here who actually gets modern footy.
6. Maybe put a Jewish stocktake through that new extension at Princes Park?
7. Is the rollercoaster still an option?
8. I know he's a meme, but maybe give the Scott brother who used to coach Norf a call


Already well ahead of last week! :thumbsup:

_________________
"Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they've stolen."

Mort Sahl


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 33644
Location: Half back flank
Nice Heavs.

But BV would totally exceed the soft cap I'm afraid...

Sent from my SM-A115F using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 17150
Location: threeohfivethree
CK95 wrote:
Nice Heavs.

But BV would totally exceed the soft cap I'm afraid...


Bit personal.

_________________
"Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they've stolen."

Mort Sahl


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 8:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm
Posts: 4299
So the review is being driven by our poor onfield performance according to our Prez. Yet the coach isn't part of the review? What's the point then?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 11:02 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1566
rhino27 wrote:
So the review is being driven by our poor onfield performance according to our Prez. Yet the coach isn't part of the review? What's the point then?

I have a feeling there is already a pre determined outcome to all this ,

Let’s just wait and see

_________________
#sayerscouldbetheman!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 11:19 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm
Posts: 4299
azzablue wrote:
rhino27 wrote:
So the review is being driven by our poor onfield performance according to our Prez. Yet the coach isn't part of the review? What's the point then?

I have a feeling there is already a pre determined outcome to all this ,

Let’s just wait and see


You could well be right. For the record, I am in the Teague should go camp and Ross is my first preference.
However, if the review determines Teague is the man and it is a proper and thorough review I'll accept that. However, the review should then not only include what help Teague needs but steps needed to entice those people to the club to give him that support.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 11:52 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 4486
azzablue wrote:
rhino27 wrote:
So the review is being driven by our poor onfield performance according to our Prez. Yet the coach isn't part of the review? What's the point then?

I have a feeling there is already a pre determined outcome to all this ,

Let’s just wait and see

IE Pav = Ross Lyon recommendation

_________________
Just throwing it out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I still think it's just another MLG media cock-up. It would be madness to not include coaches in this.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 4486
Donstuie wrote:
I still think it's just another MLG media cock-up. It would be madness to not include coaches in this.

Hasn't it been clarified that coaches are in the football department and therefore included?

_________________
Just throwing it out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
jezzarules wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I still think it's just another MLG media cock-up. It would be madness to not include coaches in this.

Hasn't it been clarified that coaches are in the football department and therefore included?

Exactly.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:50 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree but hope Dayers has a greater ability to articulate properly and precisely the clubs position on important matters


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:51 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Sayers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 12:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33617
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
For that reason I think the club needs to drip feed Sayers to the media when talking about these matters.

You could even have MLG officially pass the baton on-air ~ "Luke will be spearheading this review and will be happy to field questions about it from this point forward" and he can retreat back to the boardroom where he's more comfortable.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm
Posts: 4299
Donstuie wrote:
jezzarules wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I still think it's just another MLG media cock-up. It would be madness to not include coaches in this.

Hasn't it been clarified that coaches are in the football department and therefore included?

Exactly.


Must have missed that. Good to know. MLG needs to be treated like pope Benedict. Lock him up in a room and don't let him talk to anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
You know
It’s hard to believe a review is needed
Look at the one constant in all this
It’s called window dressing



What shits me with you keogh, is the club is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't because the past can't be erased in your head.

Reminds me of an old girlfriend who never gets over the break up.

Its a review. All business and sporting clubs do it all around the world.

And the Board is slowly changing, and I know, even if the names changed on the Board, you would still be whinging with, I told you so, or its a farce because the body in control of the club is still called The Board and not Binary.

I am rapt to be having a Review of the Assistants, the Conditioning Dept, the psychs, the real decison makers who make recommendations to The Board. These are the answers we want answered and addressed.

Most scribes in the Media, with the exception of Robbo and his Newscorp 'yes Robbo' men, Whateley, Ralph and keogh, think the List is fine. Maybe one two or three players short. I bet the doomsdayers, anti carlton linchmob will all back track too when we have the Football Dept, including Game Plan upgraded to an elite standard ie sharpen the edges, get an unconditional brand of footy and weed out the passengers, which only a Review can do. Sacking the Coach isn't what's needed now. I want the football Dept fixed so its fit for purpose. Football first. Politics second. Even if politics is going fine, we will still need Football Dept sorted.

Having a Review of the Football Dept is a good thing and a step in the RIGHT direction, and the timing couldn't be better. Agree with this last line?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:41 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
Donstuie wrote:
camel wrote:
bluebo baggers wrote:
The only thing missing from the update is the proposed time line - does anyone know when the panel is expected to report back to the board?


Shortly after Sayers sends them the findings, yeah?!

What I don't get is hearing criticism about the timing, starting it now rather than end of season.

Starting it now means the findings get delivered at the start of our 2022 preparations, rather than early next year when it's too @#$%&! late to do anything about it.


Right on.

Also we need to make decisions on Assistant Coaches before August 1st.

Its great timing. Can't look in the rear view mirrors,; that horse has bolted.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
Drewgirl wrote:
What’s the point of a full review when Teague is not getting reviewed. I mean he is an important part of the football dept. Not saying get rid of him but he needs to be reviewed too. What a crock !!


The Football Dept gets shaken and there will something regarding Teague's coaching, connection with Assistant and development Coaches, and Match day set up.

Given its led by Sawyers and not MLG, I think he wants answers/ a response to all the media speculation about Teagues on field, tactics, game plan and general persona.

This is BIG. hence external panelists led by an ex PWC Chairman. There's going to be answers; with this client, its personal.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 22924
Location: Bondi Beach
CK95 wrote:



That is soooo good. Can't remember reading that.

You're a good sport CK :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3474 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 ... 174  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], showbag and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group