Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 18, 2024 10:26 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 8:12 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 11862
Location: Melbourne
I'd rather have gotten flogged last night.

We've snatched defeat from the jaws of victory twice in three weeks now. The Adelaide game once again has set the tone.

17th Premiership wrote:
Bottom line: they worked much harder than us. And smarter.

PS. I’m not as critical of our backline which kept us in the game despite their overwhelming I50 dominance (except the lapses which enabled Bobby Hill and Daicos to break free and leaving Pendlebury on his own whilst falling for Sidebum’s obvious BS… but that was mostly the fault of midfielders more than backmen).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Was sitting on that side of the ground in the member zone area, and nearly everyone was screaming to not let Pendlebury get free... How can a bay full of supporters can see it but the team can't?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 8:18 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 6846
79Vintage wrote:
Voss in his presser was realistic and upbeat. Great to hear!
Martin, Marchbank and McGovern to return next week.

Disappointing presser, he doesn't have to face feral scum supporters at work on Monday...I wanted to see veins bulging and an apology to the fans... yes I'm still mad

People blame individuals in our back half when the game was lost further up the ground. not a great day for those on the ground and those up in the box.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 8:30 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 11690
Location: Brisbane
it does begger some belief that Kennedy is not in our current and best available 22.

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 8:37 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3473
Rather than vent with vociferous anger (did enough of that last night), my only contribution is this:

Michael Voss is Craig McRae's bunny

Own it Vossy!!!

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 9:06 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2598
CK95 wrote:
I was worried about a couple of things prematch. If it was close, we'd probably lose. Pies with the 8 day break v our 6.

And bringing in so many underdone players. Cerra started well but really seemed to fade, Cunners not enough of it and made 2 really sloppy mistakes, the shit handball to Walsh & the one where he turned back into a tackle, uuugh. Just didn't seem match ready. Then you add in Fantasia with his 3 touches or whatever.

As others have said, Kennedy absolutely should have started. I thought the whole point was we capitalise on their midfield being down a couple FFS.

We just looked stagnant out there & continually went the panic dump kick. But to the Pies credit that was perceived pressure on their part, just really felt out coached tonight.

Hewett got it a bit but man his lack of awareness at times was so frustrating.

What the hell was with Harry's kick into the fwd line near the end. Where was that composure we've seemed to be building lately. Just dumb.

Hate to say it but it actually felt more like a 3-4 goal margin. And that the season just turned around for both teams.



great set up kick just our dumb forwrds were sleeping while the defenders were awake, dumb side


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 9:09 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2598
Sydney Blue wrote:
Fantasia missing that set shot was last week's Durdin moment.

Hamill and Vossy I will give you a hint, the dinky kick from the full back to the pocket after a behind never works. You give up half the ground and get locked in.

Try come up with something different.

Hansen Vossy 2 handballs in clearing situation is plenty the 3rd 4th and 5th just invites pressure and turnover.

Jordan Russell Vossy tell your big blokes to lead in different directions and tell your smalls to be at their feet not flying for the mark.

Andrew Russell just go. Get as far away from the club as you can get a never return.

Austin stop picking players with a history of injuries and pick players who can actually get on the park. I know you are not entirely to blame some of this lays with SOS but you haven't covered yourself in glory with Motlop Carroll M and Fantasia

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk



true


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 9:30 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2598
out coached, congested our stoppages and voss did nothing
charlie is a forward who plays from behind and wants the easy ball
our smalls think they are talls
our defenders play in front and too far off their opponents
we are too slow and not the most switched on side (a bit coaching would help, I'm not sure what they do in those team meetings)
we are panic merchants, no composure at all
stagnant lazy and a very selfish team
no urgentsy and last but not least unaware of their surroundings

very disappointed in voss and his brains trust, they act like they know what we are doing wrong but they can't even fix something as simple our our forward line with two of the best and dangerous kpf in the comp,
btw harry's kicking probems comes down to the way he holds the ball


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 9:57 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 11862
Location: Melbourne
Why don't our smalls stay down?

Time and time again everyone flies for the mark and two oppo players just hang back and pick up the spills.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 10:16 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:27 pm
Posts: 5360
Location: Conservative Brisbane :O(
Not trying to single zac Williams out but thaT first goal arguing with the umpires, looked genuinely surprised of the quick play, and there were no team mates to be seen. There is a time and a place for everything and colon have their fair share of tools, but in those dangerous type situations they seem to be able to keep it together and they tend to ice the clutch plays.

I am assuming from zac thouy 3 goals last week something similar happened

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 10:37 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4201
Location: Perth
Last week was unacceptable. Statements were made. Standards (re)set. And we dished THAT up.

So many questions. So much concern.

Vossy was extremely agitated on the bench a few times.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 10:57 am 
Online
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17583
Not overly surprised. As I thought, Mihocek took Weitering away from the contest and we didn't adapt. Why didn't Hamill have a counter strategy?
Not a big name but I thought Cincotta was good after a long lay off.

IMHO we can't structure our team on the stoppage game and expect to be consistent because it relies on one player too much. Last year Cripps has 27+ possessions, we win 9 out of 10 games. He has 26 or less, we win 5 out of 14. Collingwood did what Brisbane did last year, put a bigger bodied mid on Cripps and he struggles to have the desired impact. We need more speed and adaptability around the contest. Collingwood stood outside us around the contest and knocked it into space. (Richmond 2019) and they were off. If we won it, they closed in and shut us down. They were more disciplined and went in with a better plan.
Defensive 50 stoppages were a huge issue for us. Too many easy goals. The coaches have a lot of work to do in that regard.

It will be interesting to see what the coaches come up with for next week. We started the season far more system based. We've regressed to previous years football where we're relying on 3 or 4 stars to win us games. Selfish, dumb decisions being made again where players think they'll do it all themselves. That doesn't win premierships.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 11:16 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 5042
Effes wrote:
Score sources (points)

Kick in
Collingwood 0
Carlton 6

Stoppage
Collingwood 44
Carlton 22


Turnover
Collingwood 41
Carlton 51

Defensive half
Collingwood 40
Carlton 32


amazingly jon brown said on fox after the game we are now the bottom or next bottom team in the comp in allowing scoring from stoppage this season.

so for all the bluster about stoppages, we're quite bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 11:24 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 7886
Our pressure ratings are right down. 145 during the 2nd qtr, must be record low. Compare that to a record 240 during the 3rd qtr against GWS. The latter is an extreme admittedly that a side won't keep up, but it gives you an idea. Don't have that and rubbish footy follows. Need to be a consistent 180s with bursts in the 200s. We are losing nothing when we do that. We are not working hard enough for long enough.

Will help when the gun players return. We have a heap out, and were 4 players short too with Young, Fantasia, Durdin and Williams out there. Fantasia and Durdin 12 touches, no tackles and a combined 0.1. After all that it was just a goal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 5042
pittonet at times looks like prime #44 out there. but his workrate & quality really drops off after the 1st qtr.

tdk ... yes he played great at giants and nabbed 3 goals. but other than that, for some reason his around the ground game and effectiveness hasn't been there since pittonet came back into the team

since pittonet's inclusion, defensively by a number of metrics we've been bottom 4 in the afl.

given the best ruck in the comp (gawn) couldn't co exist with another ruck, and the dees system couldn't incorporate another ruck.

(these are all factual, and not opinion. yeah? we can agree on that? )

so, i wonder what our coaching staff are thinking, and where they're at about our noticeable onfield decline (barring the outlier - gws game) and i wonder what they're proposing to do about it.


like blue vain said, this stoppage and clearance gameplan is too tactically reliant on individual, rather then team - and imo is too easily countered and neutered. and collingwood showed last night team first structures (no matter how many crucial outs you have) - with individual cameo brilliance within it (daicos) is what wins big games, finals and ultimately grand finals.

bcos if we serve the last 3 weeks up the next two games we will be dismantled, & top 4 is well and truly over. and really, it has the makings of derailing the season, if players lose belief and confidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10109
Melbourne is the team you want to play 2 rucks against.
Need to make Lever accountable and we’ll need Pitto’s body against Gawn.

Having said this, I now have no doubt will omit one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 20412
Location: North of the border
jim wrote:
Our pressure ratings are right down. 145 during the 2nd qtr, must be record low. Compare that to a record 240 during the 3rd qtr against GWS. The latter is an extreme admittedly that a side won't keep up, but it gives you an idea. Don't have that and rubbish footy follows. Need to be a consistent 180s with bursts in the 200s. We are losing nothing when we do that. We are not working hard enough for long enough.

Will help when the gun players return. We have a heap out, and were 4 players short too with Young, Fantasia, Durdin and Williams out there. Fantasia and Durdin 12 touches, no tackles and a combined 0.1. After all that it was just a goal.
You have 8 to 10 players AFL ready sitting on the sidelines trying to get a game the pressure ratings goes up.
When you constantly have injury list with 10 to 12 players on it the pressure to keep your spot isn't there.
Seriously how Russell has kept his job is beyond me.
Richmond have an injury crisis with 12 players out. That's our injury list going into every game for the past 5 years.
Collingwood were depleted missing Degoey and Mitchell
Geelong were struck down missing Stewart
West Coast finished last because they had injuries last week.

How hard can it be to get a group of 20 to 30 year olds who have spent since the age of 6 at the top end of sporting abilities to run 10 to 12 ks in nearly 2 hours with constantly having rests and breaks.
It's not rocket science keeping these guys fit and available. Other clubs seem to be able to do it. Sure they may have patches where they have a few injuries but not 10 to 12 every week.

We have a golden opportunity for success this bloke who is in charge of getting our blokes ready to play is failing us badly.

Cook grow some balls and march him out the door.

Motlop best preseason every supposedly the top trainer . Stubs his toe he has now been sidelined for 12 weeks. The kid is 20.
Last year missing for calf injuries.
How the @#$%&! does that happen


Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 12449
Location: Sydney
Russell seems to be good at rehabilitating players with major, career threatening injuries (Curnow, Walsh) and getting blokes fit to run huge distances, but clueless with recurrent soft tissue injuries. Can we cut his brain in half and splice it with that of a hamstring specialist?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 1:00 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 250
once again for many F>>>>>k years i have been saying the same thing 1 our players are to SLOW and all have same 1 gear except for walsh 2 our game plan there is no run always kicking to a contest ,but winning all those close games was like putting a bandage on the wound. The good news is coaches now have the rest of year to FIX this problems. why would we recruit E hollands when is just one pace player ,we have many of those types


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 1:06 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3310
In defence of McKay's last quarter mis-kick:

He rushed it. He didn't need to, but we'd had success with the quick kick deep forward on two occasions previously. He swung around and it came slightly off the side of the boot, so instead of going 15 meters out from goal - giving TDK a chance to run at the footy - it went 20 meters out from goal where the Magies defenders had gathered. If McKay had kicked it deeper - to where TDK was standing, shoulder-to-shoulder with his defender, it would have been spoiled over the line and the Magpies would have had posession. If he'd taken longer, then the four Magpies defenders who raffled the mark off his kick would have clogged up the 50 entirely. Now, if he had his time again I'm sure he would take a breath, and try and find a Carlton player coming from the fat side. But 99% of our players were either right near him, or along the wing behind him, because we relentlesslty set up down the wing all through the last quarter.

This play was a microcosm of our match - the Pies outworked us. They dropped back, ran harder and faster than we did and we were still laboring, trying to execute the same plan again and again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 1:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 20412
Location: North of the border
bluechampion wrote:
In defence of McKay's last quarter mis-kick:

He rushed it. He didn't need to, but we'd had success with the quick kick deep forward on two occasions previously. He swung around and it came slightly off the side of the boot, so instead of going 15 meters out from goal - giving TDK a chance to run at the footy - it went 20 meters out from goal where the Magies defenders had gathered. If McKay had kicked it deeper - to where TDK was standing, shoulder-to-shoulder with his defender, it would have been spoiled over the line and the Magpies would have had posession. If he'd taken longer, then the four Magpies defenders who raffled the mark off his kick would have clogged up the 50 entirely. Now, if he had his time again I'm sure he would take a breath, and try and find a Carlton player coming from the fat side. But 99% of our players were either right near him, or along the wing behind him, because we relentlesslty set up down the wing all through the last quarter.

This play was a microcosm of our match - the Pies outworked us. They dropped back, ran harder and faster than we did and we were still laboring, trying to execute the same plan again and again.
It's funny how supporters are quick to point out a Harry error but over look the 30 or so dumb decisions Curnow makes a game.

If he kicked to the pocket or top of the square he was kicking to an out number.
Carlton had 4 on 2 to where he kicked it but he miss hit it and pinpointed it to one of the 2.



Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Shakin and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group