| TalkingCarlton https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37141 |
Page 2 of 12 |
| Author: | billc3 [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 1:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Haven't seen any footage except the front on angle. Does he get him in the head or chest...?? Looked like an old fashioned shirt front.. Whole body goes back, not just the head.... Anyway, from the front angle that was my first reaction and I haven't seen other views?? (not just my one-eyed view either  ) Go Blues |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 3:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Noonamah Blue wrote: bondiblue wrote: Carlton will challenge the verdict to Williams. Argue Medium to Low Impact. I didn't like it when Ablett got off twice with his feet leaving the ground with an elbow raised into the neck and to the head, but he got off. Williams had his arm tucked in. Good luck. Good news, AFL should be asking St Kilda as to why they waited till after the game to concussion test the player. Good point ... after he put his head down over the ball to win another 8 clearances. I don't like players jumping off the ground to bump or whatever, but the AFL set a precedence with Ablett imo |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 3:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
billc3 wrote: Haven't seen any footage except the front on angle. Does he get him in the head or chest...?? Looked like an old fashioned shirt front.. Whole body goes back, not just the head.... Anyway, from the front angle that was my first reaction and I haven't seen other views?? (not just my one-eyed view either ) Go Blues No comment |
|
| Author: | Donstuie [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Shock horror... Williams ban upheld by AFL Tribunal |
|
| Author: | kingkerna [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
How is it medium impact? Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
He is an idiot for doing it but that suspension and medium impact ruling is bullshit. |
|
| Author: | robertbb [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Shocked to be sitting here... Can someone also explain to me please how we have this home game taken off us and given to Richmond? |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
grrofunger wrote: He is an idiot for doing it but that suspension and medium impact ruling is bullshit. This post makes sense |
|
| Author: | jezzarules [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Donstuie wrote: So appealing it didn't risk an extra week? Wasn't the original one with early plea? |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
kingkerna wrote: How is it medium impact? Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk "potential to cause injury" POTENTIAL doesn't have anything to do with the ACTUAL impact. And the anti Carlton QC Gleesen from the AFL is allowed to argue this, and take this line, and win it? Its a kangaroo court. We use to have QC's representing our players. ANYONE KNOW WHO WAS REPORESENTING wILLIAMS? Its an easy case to argue against Gleesen's potential argument. Gleesen did the same against Prespakis' Appeal, when no one was injured. This same bloke who let off a Crows player on Appeal who had a 3 week suspension and injured a player who will not play for longer than 3 weeks. Its wrong on every front. Gleesen, Umpire 22, Michael Christian, Robinson are Carlton enemies No.1 Disgrace that Carlton let Gleesen get his way. Disgrace. I smell a rat. |
|
| Author: | Navy One [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
We'll take the Williams decision but these clowns better be consistent in 2021 .... If Player X jumps and hits Player Y in the head AND Player Y goes down but plays the rest of the game AND Player Y passes a concussion test THEN Player X gets outed for 1 week (minimum) We'll see how long this lasts. |
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Navy One wrote: We'll take the Williams decision but these clowns better be consistent in 2021 .... If Player X jumps and hits Player Y in the head AND Player Y goes down but plays the rest of the game AND Player Y passes a concussion test THEN Player X gets outed for 1 week (minimum) We'll see how long this lasts. Won’t get passed 1st round... |
|
| Author: | killpies [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
SurreyBlue wrote: Navy One wrote: We'll take the Williams decision but these clowns better be consistent in 2021 .... If Player X jumps and hits Player Y in the head AND Player Y goes down but plays the rest of the game AND Player Y passes a concussion test THEN Player X gets outed for 1 week (minimum) We'll see how long this lasts. Won’t get passed 1st round... Next one will be talked down as accidental and a fine or no case to answer |
|
| Author: | billc3 [ Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
SurreyBlue wrote: Navy One wrote: We'll take the Williams decision but these clowns better be consistent in 2021 .... If Player X jumps and hits Player Y in the head AND Player Y goes down but plays the rest of the game AND Player Y passes a concussion test THEN Player X gets outed for 1 week (minimum) We'll see how long this lasts. Won’t get passed 1st round... Errrr.... Ok.... So the actual impact doesn't matter, it had the 'potential' to be serious..... Mmm... So every tackle has that potential, hell every kick off the ground... This is sooo weird to adjudicate that it will get dropped almost instantly... Stiff...stupid.. Move on... Go Blues |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Wed Mar 10, 2021 6:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
We've been dudded again: a seasonal execution of Carlton player. We have become accustomed to that sort of unprecedented behaviour from the AFL Commission for the past 20 years, despite having paid the harshest penalties ever handed out in 2002, and we have paid overs with those penalties. Now we are debt free to the AFL, so we expect some reprieve. Nevertheless the executioner continues to demand their pound of flesh, but they also want blood. The bleeding will stop one day from the hands of the over zealous, possible corrupted AFL Commission. Lets get on with the game and the evolution of a Premiership team. Hopefully the players step up and they open our window this year, starting against the Tigers, as the underdogs. Blues should be calm, cool, and breathing a bit of fire, not for the Williams punishment but to make amends for the last 2 years' let downs, and take our learnings from that to this next game. Can the underdog win? Lets discuss that. |
|
| Author: | murraycray [ Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Our backline is good, Richmond's is very good. I think their intercept marking is top notch, so no bombing it in. They can go end to end with relative ease, and set up their forwards better than any other side. If they don't mark down back then Short and co swoop in. If we can seriously pressure their defenders we're in with a chance, otherwise it's gonna be a long night unfortunately. |
|
| Author: | Heavs [ Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
As long as the cauliflower are consistent - potential to cause injury is now the threshold. I get the feeling this is going to go the way of the Todd Curley rule but. |
|
| Author: | SurreyBlue [ Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
murraycray wrote: Our backline is good, Richmond's is very good. I think their intercept marking is top notch, so no bombing it in. They can go end to end with relative ease, and set up their forwards better than any other side. If they don't mark down back then Short and co swoop in. If we can seriously pressure their defenders we're in with a chance, otherwise it's gonna be a long night unfortunately. You need to make them accountable. Don't let them dictate from half back and please, please, please don't try and play the extra loose back and give them the extra player, else - game over. |
|
| Author: | jake_h03 [ Wed Mar 10, 2021 9:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
So at this stage, Charlie, Marchbank, TDK, Kemp, Newman and Williams are all out. Betts, Levi, Weiters, Harry, Gov, Newnes are all listed as test. We'd want to hope Weiters, Harry, and at least one of Levi or Gov get up. Richmond are missing pretty much no one of course |
|
| Author: | CK95 [ Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R1: Richmond Vs Carlton (Pre match discussion) |
Have Levi & Mcgovern played any footy in the last month though? |
|
| Page 2 of 12 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|