| TalkingCarlton https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| List Management 2021 https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37110 |
Page 53 of 76 |
| Author: | bmaurizio [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
Yup agree on Adam Cerra trade value p6 & SPS is fair with sweetener . Freo can’t expect much more especially if we’re the nominated destination team. It’s a good outcome fir both parties. |
|
| Author: | bmaurizio [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
LOB, Fisher , Dow & McGov are all a concern too, would be seeking to move as many on as possible and practical, we’re desperate for a mature Ruckman , a ready utility key position player, another hard nosed midfielder wouldn’t go astray. |
|
| Author: | Rod Spooky Galt [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
I see value in keeping LOB. But that doesn't offset the frustration that we've wasted a year playing Newnes ahead of him. Wasted development. |
|
| Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
Rod Spooky Galt wrote: I see value in keeping LOB. But that doesn't offset the frustration that we've wasted a year playing Newnes ahead of him. Wasted development. agree, just ridiculous |
|
| Author: | jamespul65 [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 1:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
My ideal trade would be 2022 first rnd and sps for cerra and keep p6. With p6 we select best mid (hard quick) in draft. our midfield is covered . Pick 25 we select quickest best tall defender . Go get them NICK |
|
| Author: | kezza [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
Kemp re-signed for 2 years. |
|
| Author: | dannyboy [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
shambles |
|
| Author: | AGRO [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 4:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
bmaurizio wrote: Yup agree on Adam Cerra trade value p6 & SPS is fair with sweetener . Freo can’t expect much more especially if we’re the nominated destination team. It’s a good outcome fir both parties. Flower the good outcome - North are going to walk Coleman-Jones straight to the PSD. No more Mr Nice Guy Carlton - offer pick 6, drop the microphone and walk out. 
|
|
| Author: | Drewgirl [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 5:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
AGRO wrote: bmaurizio wrote: Yup agree on Adam Cerra trade value p6 & SPS is fair with sweetener . Freo can’t expect much more especially if we’re the nominated destination team. It’s a good outcome fir both parties. Flower the good outcome - North are going to walk Coleman-Jones straight to the PSD. No more Mr Nice Guy Carlton - offer pick 6, drop the microphone and walk out. Yep SPS is too good to be a sweatner I think. I would argue that him played in the right position with increased confidence, is just as good as Cerra. Controversial to some, but I believe this. |
|
| Author: | Crusader [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
bondiblue wrote: carntheblues wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: News floating around Newnes Parks and Boyd delisted I assume that means we are keeping LOB? Wouldn't be surprised if we kept LOB. Every team I muck around with shows we need a bonafide wingmen to rely on week in week out. Sure flexibility is good to see from coach and player, but a settled team is gold imo. LOB's running capacity and ability to hit long targets when NOT under pressure are valuable tools. Who else for the wings other than Walsh (I want in the middle) and Ed (who turns 33 next year)? I dream that Philp, Cuningham could have the engines to play the role, other than that I dream it may be Carrol but he seems more like an inside outside mid. Cerra? Where does he play if Walsh Cripps is teaming up with Hewett, (a fit and determined) Williams? Wing-midfield mixing it with the running machine Walsh? We are desperate for a wingman, but come on, we know it’s not going to be O’Brien, just as it’s not going to be Cottrell. They’re both too slow between the ears. It won’t be Cuningham either. He’s physically capable (when fit) of running the other way, but that’s just not his game. He gets a bit lost trying to pick up the danger… plus, it’s pretty hard to overlook that fitness caveat. He’s a guy that has had hamstring problems in the past & is now using a piece of those same hamstrings to hold his knee together. It could be Philp, that’s certainly what his draft profile suggests…. IF the #bestinthebusiness works a miracle on his groins. It could be Carroll, but I don’t think anyone truly knows what the young fella has to offer. He certainly looks like a footballer though. If he turns up to preseason closer to 85kg than 75kg, he’d have to be in the mix. |
|
| Author: | carntheblues [ Fri Sep 17, 2021 10:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
bondiblue wrote: carntheblues wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: News floating around Newnes Parks and Boyd delisted I assume that means we are keeping LOB? Wouldn't be surprised if we kept LOB. Every team I muck around with shows we need a bonafide wingmen to rely on week in week out. Sure flexibility is good to see from coach and player, but a settled team is gold imo. LOB's running capacity and ability to hit long targets when NOT under pressure are valuable tools. Who else for the wings other than Walsh (I want in the middle) and Ed (who turns 33 next year)? I dream that Philp, Cuningham could have the engines to play the role, other than that I dream it may be Carrol but he seems more like an inside outside mid. Cerra? Where does he play if Walsh Cripps is teaming up with Hewett, (a fit and determined) Williams? Wing-midfield mixing it with the running machine Walsh? Personally I prefer Walsh on the wing. That still leaves Cripps, Kennedy, Dow, Ed, Fisher, Cunningham, Martin, Williams all able to run through the middle. And add to that Cerra. |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Sat Sep 18, 2021 12:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
Rod Spooky Galt wrote: I see value in keeping LOB. But that doesn't offset the frustration that we've wasted a year playing Newnes ahead of him. Wasted development. In retrospect yes. We got ahead of ourselves. Thought we had a lot of early round picks developed just because of the number of game they played. Should be judged by who they played with, how many times and how many wins with whom, and without whom. |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Sat Sep 18, 2021 12:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
Drewgirl wrote: AGRO wrote: bmaurizio wrote: Yup agree on Adam Cerra trade value p6 & SPS is fair with sweetener . Freo can’t expect much more especially if we’re the nominated destination team. It’s a good outcome fir both parties. Flower the good outcome - North are going to walk Coleman-Jones straight to the PSD. No more Mr Nice Guy Carlton - offer pick 6, drop the microphone and walk out. Yep SPS is too good to be a sweatner I think. I would argue that him played in the right position with increased confidence, is just as good as Cerra. Controversial to some, but I believe this. Maybe, but I think there's merit in keeping SPS TBH. |
|
| Author: | bondiblue [ Sat Sep 18, 2021 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
carntheblues wrote: bondiblue wrote: carntheblues wrote: Sydney Blue wrote: News floating around Newnes Parks and Boyd delisted I assume that means we are keeping LOB? Wouldn't be surprised if we kept LOB. Every team I muck around with shows we need a bonafide wingmen to rely on week in week out. Sure flexibility is good to see from coach and player, but a settled team is gold imo. LOB's running capacity and ability to hit long targets when NOT under pressure are valuable tools. Who else for the wings other than Walsh (I want in the middle) and Ed (who turns 33 next year)? I dream that Philp, Cuningham could have the engines to play the role, other than that I dream it may be Carrol but he seems more like an inside outside mid. Cerra? Where does he play if Walsh Cripps is teaming up with Hewett, (a fit and determined) Williams? Wing-midfield mixing it with the running machine Walsh? Walsh on a wing solves a wing position, but we are robbing a great mid, forming part of a Batman and Robin dup when fit and in form. Personally I prefer Walsh on the wing. That still leaves Cripps, Kennedy, Dow, Ed, Fisher, Cunningham, Martin, Williams all able to run through the middle. And add to that Cerra. |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Sat Sep 18, 2021 10:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | List Management 2021 |
Move McKay to the wing position on the members' stand side |
|
| Author: | Humpers [ Sun Sep 19, 2021 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
I'm happy to use pick #6 on Cerra. On draft night if there is a young defender we're keen on then maybe consider live trading of future draft picks. |
|
| Author: | carntheblues [ Sun Sep 19, 2021 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
bluehammer wrote: Move McKay to the wing position on the members' stand side If you are thinking that way I prefer Charlie on a wing. He could do either. |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Sun Sep 19, 2021 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
carntheblues wrote: bluehammer wrote: Move McKay to the wing position on the members' stand side If you are thinking that way I prefer Charlie on a wing. He could do either. |
|
| Author: | Rod Spooky Galt [ Sun Sep 19, 2021 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
Could we trade Pick 6 to the Dogs re Darcy bid? Most mock drafts have Daicos at 1, Darcy going around 3. I hope teams have learned from Silvagni to bid early and force full value. Pick 3 with father/son discount = 1675.5 points required. What would be now Pick 7 = 1644 points, leaving 31.5 leftover. Pick 15 and their future first for 6 and 25? Or Pick 6 for 15 and Mitch Wallis? |
|
| Author: | carntheblues [ Sun Sep 19, 2021 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: List Management 2021 |
I don't think we need Mitch Wallis. |
|
| Page 53 of 76 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|