Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:15 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 237 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2015 11:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Setting aside the whole 'club is doomed' talk for a moment, not that it isn't valid to some degree.

We drop a lot of runners from the side. Mick declares he likes the balance of the selected side. We then proceed to concede 78 inside 50s by getting slaughtered every time the ball escapes a contested situation.

Micks playing checkers and 17 other clubs are playing chess.

At the very least, why aren't we playing our best athletes to at least apply pressure? How many games are we going to see moderate success at stoppages and a massacre as soon as the ball is clear?

I simply had to turn off yesterday. Not because we were getting blown out, god knows that's happened before - many times. But because we were actually painful to watch. Something needs to change very soon or we'll be losing a hell of a lot more than a bunch of games this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2015 11:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4548
Punter22 wrote:
Setting aside the whole 'club is doomed' talk for a moment, not that it isn't valid to some degree.

We drop a lot of runners from the side. Mick declares he likes the balance of the selected side. We then proceed to concede 78 inside 50s by getting slaughtered every time the ball escapes a contested situation.

Micks playing checkers and 17 other clubs are playing chess.

At the very least, why aren't we playing our best athletes to at least apply pressure? How many games are we going to see moderate success at stoppages and a massacre as soon as the ball is clear?

I simply had to turn off yesterday. Not because we were getting blown out, god knows that's happened before - many times. But because we were actually painful to watch. Something needs to change very soon or we'll be losing a hell of a lot more than a bunch of games this year.


...you forgot to add... Mick bemoans we didn't have enough runners at the press conference....

Being taken for fools...that's why people won't show and members won't renew...they can kiss at least 4 goodbye. Clearly being bullshitted to on multiple levels...
Ultimately the club will learn if it's not worth sacking the coach now
:lol:

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 3:47 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Just reading these posts makes me wonder where the club will be in a few years.

Once upon a time, the name, 'Carlton' attracted sponsors and players who wanted to play for us. If we keep losing games, have a team of players that look disinterested, a coach who spends half his presser talking up the opposition, an MC which seems incapable of analyzing the opposition and picking a team that can counter their strengths and exploit their weaknesses and a board that seems divorced from the reality of what is happening within and without the club, wewill end up in an ever worsening downward spiral.
The club needs money to stay afloat. Gate takings and membership make up a large portion of that money. Sponsorship is another large part, pokies another and the AFL equalization another.
If we, the rusted on supporters and members are leaving, that alone should be ringing alarm bells in the boardroom. That Eddie and Jarrod left should be cause for alarm. Nobody leaves Carlton. Well, they do now. And once, everybody wanted to come to Carlton. Juddy came but it may have been for the money. Collingwood would have been a better place for him footy-wise.
Now everybody wants to go to Hawthorn or Sydney and Melbourne gets the discards. Well we are going to be thankful for the discards if we don't change.

I can see us folded within a few short years. It's in the AFL's interest to have fewer clubs in the Melbourne. They are looking at Tassie and Ballarat as options. To create another cub is out of the question. It will have to be done by force. Someone will be forced to move or forced to merge. If we become cellar dwellers with no crowd pulling capacity we become just another liability like North, the Dogs and Melbourne.

Our history is a glorious one but it is fading as the years pass. I was around in the pre-Barassi years and things were bad then but this is worse.

Someone like Sellers or Fraser Brown has to spill the board and et rid of the fat cats. This is Hawthorn all over again with Don Scott flying the flag. Most of us laughed at him at the time but out of the mire rose the juggernaut that has become Hawthorn..

We need to realize that success is built on good recruiting and sensible trading and passion. We have more top ten picks that we've ever had but we picked vanilla players. SOS may or may not be the answer. I thin anybody could have put together the GWS with the picks they had but our list is crap. Our rookies are batter than our top ten picks! How does that happen?

We need a young coach with vision and passion. Who is it? I have no idea but I wouldn't even be disappointed if we went with Ratten again. He's had another three years of apprenticeship under the sniper, Clarkson and that can't have done him any harm. Whoever it is has to be brought in now so he has a chance to assess the list against HIS game plan and tell SOS what we want at the draft. If we have to trade Murphy, Gibbs, Henderson, Kreuzer and Yarran to get three or four top ten picks, so be it.

MM wasn't even upset at his presser and passed the buck to the robotic players. Under Ratts they ran and carried and Walker kicked 60 odd and we won and we lost but we tried. Play the kids. If we lose by 100 point every week but play the kids with potential, it doesn't matter. two years ago, GWS were getting beaten by 100 points every week but they have turned it around with sensible trading of their players and patience.

And then I woke up and everything was still the same.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 5:54 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 3952
MM wants to be sacked and the club is not obliging him.

_________________
Donald Trump is a @#$%&! paedophile.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 7:23 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23865
cunning ba$tard. (not you JJ, obviously!!) :razz:

just pi$$ orf Mick
and take your rabble staff with ya.

Laids can stay.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 7:27 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
jimmae wrote:
Effes wrote:
Tom Browne @TomBrowne7
Break even at Etihad about 26,000 fans. Sources say #blues would have lost circa $150,000 - $200,000 last night #afl .@7NewsMelbourne #afl

15 years on, that a mid-size stadium needs to be half full to break even is an absolute joke. That is never going to be a viable ground for games against interstate teams.

It's officially the new Waverley.


Nobody went to Waverley as it was a shit ground miles away from the city.

Nobody goes to Etihad as our team is shit.

26k to us would be simple to achieve when competitive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 7:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Runners need to run more than a quarter and a half

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 9:38 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
King Kenny wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Effes wrote:
Tom Browne @TomBrowne7
Break even at Etihad about 26,000 fans. Sources say #blues would have lost circa $150,000 - $200,000 last night #afl .@7NewsMelbourne #afl

15 years on, that a mid-size stadium needs to be half full to break even is an absolute joke. That is never going to be a viable ground for games against interstate teams.

It's officially the new Waverley.


Nobody went to Waverley as it was a shit ground miles away from the city.

Nobody goes to Etihad as our team is shit.

26k to us would be simple to achieve when competitive.


Only Carlton fans boo and don't turn up in as great a number when we're losing :garthp:

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 9:41 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
Dukes wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Effes wrote:
Tom Browne @TomBrowne7
Break even at Etihad about 26,000 fans. Sources say #blues would have lost circa $150,000 - $200,000 last night #afl .@7NewsMelbourne #afl

15 years on, that a mid-size stadium needs to be half full to break even is an absolute joke. That is never going to be a viable ground for games against interstate teams.

It's officially the new Waverley.


Nobody went to Waverley as it was a shit ground miles away from the city.

Nobody goes to Etihad as our team is shit.

26k to us would be simple to achieve when competitive.


Only Carlton fans boo and don't turn up in as great a number when we're losing :garthp:


Nah, happens to all teams, even Collingwood.
Have a look at their numbers when McAlister was President and they were on the bottom of the ladder.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 9:50 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
sandramd1967 wrote:
Unless we call an emergency meeting and have 40000 members march to princess park with people like mark maclure at the front nothing will change


Just tell me when.

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 9:55 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1582
The players seem poorly prepared this year. Fitness levels are a real concern and reoccurring niggling injuries are a problem too.
We know that most teams need 8 to 10 weeks to get their preferred on the park but something is not quite right.
Team spirt and leadership are shattered too.
I've never seen this great club in such a despondent state, it's so frustrating and sad to see.
We've been incompetent in running the club and must be responsibility , but the AFL too with combination of penalties on Black Friday and the three compromised
drafts have not exactly been helpful.
The AFL will have to assist us , if this continues at an exponential rate we are in danger of sinking faster still.
Go Baggers
Ciao

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Last edited by bmaurizio on Mon May 18, 2015 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 9:56 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9296
Synbad wrote:
So what's happening is were in rebuild but rebuild might mean blow outs.
Blow outs mean nobody coming
Nobody coming means reduced revenue
Reduced revenue is a disaster.
So the club doesn't know what to do.
This blow out means they're going to play kids.
These kids are not good enough generally or can't run out a game.
Means bigger blow outs.
Keep in mind were finished from free to air for years.
Which again means financial disaster.

The club really hasn't planned itself correctly over years.
Terrible decisions
Terrible appointments

This is the perfect storm for what's happening now.
Don't get high on your own supply...
It was never going to be as easy as what we thought...

Club is pretty much washed up


Nailed it.

_________________
Orandum est ut sit mens sana in corpore sano. Fortem posce animum mortis terrore carentem, qui spatium vitae extremum inter munera ponat naturae, qui ferre queat quoscumque labores.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 11:40 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
players should be ashamed of themselves!! the fact that just a handful of players bust a gut only serves to highlight the pathetic effort of the others. A disgrace!!

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 12:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Juanita Jones wrote:
MM wants to be sacked and the club is not obliging him.


Probably because we cant afford to pay him out then hire somebody else to take the poisoned chalice that our playing list has become!

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 12:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
Blue Revival wrote:
players should be ashamed of themselves!! the fact that just a handful of players bust a gut only serves to highlight the pathetic effort of the others. A disgrace!!



It should be noted that quite a few of the gut busters are the lesser lights, so often maligned on TC.

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 5:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
King Kenny wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Effes wrote:
Tom Browne @TomBrowne7
Break even at Etihad about 26,000 fans. Sources say #blues would have lost circa $150,000 - $200,000 last night #afl .@7NewsMelbourne #afl

15 years on, that a mid-size stadium needs to be half full to break even is an absolute joke. That is never going to be a viable ground for games against interstate teams.

It's officially the new Waverley.


Nobody went to Waverley as it was a shit ground miles away from the city.

Nobody goes to Etihad as our team is shit.

26k to us would be simple to achieve when competitive.

50% capacity shouldn't be break even 15 years after stadium completion. That's ludicrous.

Only a top four side could pull a crowd like that for a game versus an interstate team consistently. Clubs should be making money at every match considering the AFL has been consistently expanding.

I know there's challenges with restoring PP, but the biggest by far are in the court of public opinion.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 11:02 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 881
club29 wrote:
I won't be encouraging my daughter to go for Carlton. A Sydney team would be a better option. They will always be up there by the afl's design.

Carlton are a poor inner city Melbourne club whose job (in the afl's script) is to fill out the league for the tv rights agreements.

Congratulations?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 237 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 339 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group