Synbad wrote:
Loyalty to what though?
The club?
The club doesn't speak it has no emotions it has no thoughts.
You're asking people to be loyal to Trigg and MLG .. And sticks.. Mick.. Judd.. Ratten.. McKay..
Betts..fevola.. Karl Norman + Lawrence Angwin..Carazzo..
You can't be because they're all coming in and leaving.. But it's what they leave behind that influences things.. And they will all influence the club in a massive amount of different ways.
So how do you show loyalty to so many different things that drive the drone that is the club.
It takes human flesh.. Human thought.. Human sweat and human decisions.
But with each era it will morph into a totally different beast!
To show loyalty to everything about it would also excuse Germans for showing loyalty to every part and thought of Germany including Nazi Germany.
If you want to be loyal to the spirit you must stand up and exercise your conscience.
If you do not you're disloyal to the spirit of the football club
. but loyal to the people trampling it underneath.
People that have usurped what the soul of this club should be for their very own selfish interests.
I'm loyal to the spirit of this'club' for what it's supposed to be and how I grew up knowing it.
Others are loyal to the club even when it's turned into a rag.
That's fair enough.. But don't criticize Essendon** supporters showing their loyalty to their people and not what they should want their club to be..
That's extreme hypocrisy.
Synners, this is why I have said it in previous posts I would love to debate you face to face where you would have to answer questions directly and on the topic.All in good fun of course.
Because you just do not get it.
I did not say and never have said there were not faults within the CFC and that they should not be brought into the open, exposed, cleansed, cured, made good, so that we may become a great club again.
BUT THIS IS THE WRONG THREAD. GO START YOUR OWN THREAD WITH THE POSSIBLE HEADING OF
RANT