Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
Why would we need an external review into the football dept half way through a season if our coaching team was a success seems counterintuitive to me
Exactly - Sayers panicked and has no football director for advice as doesn't want to work with Sayers as President.
So squandering the clubs money is the only alternative as no one wants to work with him.
Squandering the clubs money.
My idea of squandering is the club being needlessly impacted by reduced crowds and reduced membership due to the team going backwards or stagnating at best.
If the problem isn't your boy, what's the issue? Surely you would want him to have every competent available resource available to him?
IMHO, it's money well spent. Weed out any residual issues instead of letting the ship float along aimlessly as it seems to be.
It is completely squandering not because of the review as it is necessary but the little time given to prepare and conduct the review in a correct manner.
That means selecting the commitee carefully instead of throwing crazy amounts of money at them to do it immediately without preperation.
Not to mention the review is disruptive (maybe it reflects his personality) where everyone needs to be hands on deck doubling their efforts and improve.
Could have waited a mere three months to garner a complete picture and thus squandering is the absolute correct term to use in this instance - considering our incoming president has already shown his colours that is prone to panic that filters through the club.