Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 03, 2024 2:03 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 128 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:37 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6021
You cant win flags unless you have big marking forwards and backs

Lets hope that Mitchell and Watson develop quickly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Spot on Keogh.....

We need a hard strong big bodied spine...

Mitchell McCarthy & Watson must be groomed to play seniors next year.

We need another big bodied inside midfielder to extract the ball - I want to see Judd on the wing to protect him for the long term...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:49 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Spot on Keogh.....

We need a hard strong big bodied spine...

Mitchell McCarthy & Watson must be groomed to play seniors next year.

We need another big bodied inside midfielder to extract the ball - I want to see Judd on the wing to protect him for the long term...


We all know our deficiencies but let's not panic about it, I'd rather think in terms of what will compliment our game in a positive sense. What we 'need' is in a constant state of flux. Zac Touhy is an example of getting in a player to the club with absolutely no preconditions as to when and where he might be squeezed into the side. I know he was an Irish experiment that cost us nothing but we need too allow ourselves the same kind of freedom more often. However, if it's easier just to roll out the clichés; lets not put all our eggs into just a few baskets.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10114
Problem is guys, Ratten and our match committee, whether right or wrong have decided 2 KP forwards plus the mosquito fleet is the way to go. That means Kruezer/Warnock with Waite combination is the fit. Where does the KP forward fit in? You cannot carry a ruckman on the bench?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:56 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Spot on Keogh.....
We need another big bodied inside midfielder to extract the ball - I want to see Judd on the wing to protect him for the long term...

I'm a fan of Zac Touhoy – IMO he could be anything

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:57 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4518
Location: Blisstonia.
"I like big blokes and can not lie, you other brothers cant deny"......

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:02 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
isdonis.george wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Spot on Keogh.....
We need another big bodied inside midfielder to extract the ball - I want to see Judd on the wing to protect him for the long term...

I'm a fan of Zac Touhoy – IMO he could be anything


That's what I was gently alluding to in my last post.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
keogh wrote:
You cant win flags unless you have big marking forwards and backs

Lets hope that Mitchell and Watson develop quickly



forget them - on what i have seen (admitedley only on ABC games), levi is the man - hits the contest hard - one grab marks, something that watson lacks. no urgency in his game from what i've seen of him.

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Beatle wrote:
keogh wrote:
You cant win flags unless you have big marking forwards and backs

Lets hope that Mitchell and Watson develop quickly



forget them - on what i have seen (admitedley only on ABC games), levi is the man - hits the contest hard - one grab marks, something that watson lacks. no urgency in his game from what i've seen of him.

watson will struggle to play seventy games.
can't contested mark ,can't run can't bend down and hates body contact.
I'd rather mark Austin. watto just does not have the physical attributes to play the modern game.
give me Jack daring or issac smith anyday.

and th at has nothing to do with improvement. watson can't change his body to become afl athletic.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:23 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
Synbad wrote:
Blue Beatle wrote:
keogh wrote:
You cant win flags unless you have big marking forwards and backs

Lets hope that Mitchell and Watson develop quickly



forget them - on what i have seen (admitedley only on ABC games), levi is the man - hits the contest hard - one grab marks, something that watson lacks. no urgency in his game from what i've seen of him.

watson will struggle to play seventy games.
can't contested mark ,can't run can't bend down and hates body contact.
I'd rather mark Austin. watto just does not have the physical attributes to play the modern game.
give me Jack daring or issac smith anyday.

and th at has nothing to do with improvement. watson can't change his body to become afl athletic.


this is my biggest concern with Watson. Just too many ??? with so many facets of his game.
Shame there were so many outstanding options still available at our first pick (especially the guy who kicked 3 last night, including a couple in the last! :sad: )

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
There was a contest on the HBF (camera side) late in the Bullants game that Watson should be ashamed of, and pretty much sums up what Synbad is alluding to.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:24 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 1899
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
There was a contest on the HBF (camera side) late in the Bullants game that Watson should be ashamed of, and pretty much sums up what Synbad is alluding to.


I do have some reservations about Watson and agree with some of the statements on this board but we need to give this kid a break. He has yet to complete a full preseason and is still growing. As we always say it takes longer for bigger blokes to develop. I'll reserve my judgement at this stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 20977
Location: Missing Kouta
Synbad wrote:
Blue Beatle wrote:
keogh wrote:
You cant win flags unless you have big marking forwards and backs

Lets hope that Mitchell and Watson develop quickly



forget them - on what i have seen (admitedley only on ABC games), levi is the man - hits the contest hard - one grab marks, something that watson lacks. no urgency in his game from what i've seen of him.

watson will struggle to play seventy games.
can't contested mark ,can't run can't bend down and hates body contact.
I'd rather mark Austin. watto just does not have the physical attributes to play the modern game.
give me Jack daring or issac smith anyday.

and th at has nothing to do with improvement. watson can't change his body to become afl athletic.

:garthp:

Just like we should have picked Jetta and Proud. :roll:

Kennedy was a fridge like Watson in year one and two, but do continue your rant. Watson's fitness isn't at AFL level yet. Nowhere near the muscle tone and recovery you see in players who have done at least two full pre-seasons. I guess a big 18 year old who played TAC Cup, Under 18 champs and school footy last year isn't feeling the pinch. The workload is a huge step up from that to the AFL.


Last edited by Kouta on Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 47762
Location: Prison Island
i fear we picked watson on one quality alone - his kick out of defence

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 20977
Location: Missing Kouta
grrofunger wrote:
i fear we picked watson on one quality alone - his kick out of defence

And we picked Austin to keep Gibbs in Melbourne.

Trippers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 47762
Location: Prison Island
i just havent seen any other outstanding qualities

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:56 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:50 pm
Posts: 107
WOW wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
There was a contest on the HBF (camera side) late in the Bullants game that Watson should be ashamed of, and pretty much sums up what Synbad is alluding to.


I do have some reservations about Watson and agree with some of the statements on this board but we need to give this kid a break. He has yet to complete a full preseason and is still growing. As we always say it takes longer for bigger blokes to develop. I'll reserve my judgement at this stage.


Exactly!! He'll get there, just as Yazz has.... it is year one people!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:57 pm
Posts: 457
Surely experience tells us that key-position players take time to develop. He is in his first season for God's sake, what do you expect? He was coming from a long way back fitness-wise and it takes years to build up the fitness and muscle to be competitive as a KPP. I bet if we look back to 2006 & 2007 there would be similarly damning comments about Kennedy just "not having enough good attributes" - patience!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:16 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
We have Watson, McCarthy, Mitchell, Casboult who are just kids. They need time.

The issue we have is we are ready now!

I am confident in a fit Jamo and Henderson to hold down FB and CHB.

Warnock and Kruezer are our Ruckman for the next 5 plus years.

Thornton is very handy but we need that power forward.

Names for consideration are McKernan, Dawes, Tippett, M.Brown or J.White but there isnt a lot of quality around either.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TenOutOfTen wrote:
Surely experience tells us that key-position players take time to develop. He is in his first season for God's sake, what do you expect? He was coming from a long way back fitness-wise and it takes years to build up the fitness and muscle to be competitive as a KPP. I bet if we look back to 2006 & 2007 there would be similarly damning comments about Kennedy just "not having enough good attributes" - patience!

I don't expect Wayne carey
just a guy who has some mobility isn't below his knees like a blind man feeling around for his contest and not someone who is actually worried about any contact.
he does his best not to have any touch on his opponents.
kennedy was much more progressed than watto.
watto to me is a bust!
he isn't modern day. .......and doesn't seem to want it. ...the fact he doesn't hve the attributes means he better work twice as hard not less hard.

tac he was a bg fish small pond.

this is not the tac

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 128 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Scotty12000 and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group