Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue May 28, 2024 9:24 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1599 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 80  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:57 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Quote:
Indeed. The rebirth came on the back of a man who was able to instill some confidence and process off field, and a raft of young kids who started to make an impact on the field, yielding some results.

The question in my mind is are we doing everything we can to set us up for a sustained period of excellence AND win Premierships AND become an off-field powerhouse (membership, financial, culture etc). Look at the previous Premiers and see how they got that so right - Brisbane, Sydney, Geelong and Collingwood. Hawthorn made difficult, major decisions on and off the field, much initially driven by a board member (Dunstall). It included a change of president, change of coach (with thorough selection process) and major financial initiatives that boosted coffers and membership.

I think what Josh is pointing out very strongly is what a lot of us have been saying on here for a while, that the systems we need to become a powerhouse are not where they need to be (eg the process that gave Ratten the job, twice extending Ratten's contract when it wasn't necessary, the process that would have given Voss the job had he wanted it, appointing a coaching panel with mostly no experience, giving favour to ex-Carlton people (look at Geelong's appointment of Scott, being a favourite son was irrelevant) etc). At the end of the day, it is the Board which is resposible for those decisions. Even if Swann makes a decision himself, the Board still needs to ratify such appointments. Had the Board not prematurely extended Ratten's contract, he almost certainly wouldn't be coach going into 2011. That says something.

Josh's passion comes from his frustration at what he sees as the shortcomings at the Club that have yet to be addressed. Ditto Synbad. I have always found Josh to be a very rational, reasoned poster. His passion and frustration is much more evident of late, and seems to have aroused the ire of some on here. I think I understand where that frustration is coming from, for I too share it. It is the knowledge that we have a golden opportunity over the next 5-8 years to win a Premiership, hopefully more than one. But we need to do everything right to make that happen, on field and off. If we don't get the right decision makers in place, to drive this Club the way it needs to be driven, we will turn around in 10 years time and be shattered that we had some of the best talent in the competition but couldn't win a flag. My father, who has been watching Carlton play for 70 years, does not believe we have the right people in place, starting with the President.

It is absolutely imperative NOW that we have the right people making the right decisions and implementing the right processes. There is an urgency now that wasn't there 5 years ago because now is the time we need to be capitalising and winning Premierships. I do not believe that Kernahan is the right person to be President, and I have stated that numnerous times on this forum since I joined in its previous incarnation. I have no idea about the rest of the indivuduals on the Board, other than it seems there are too many on it. But the Board as a whole has endorsed a number of decisions that I think were not in the best interest of the Club. Recent appointments of assistant coaches are IMHO much better decisions, so hopefully the Board is learning. But we no longer have 5 years to learn and get it right, we must get it right now.

As for the coach, this has been debated at length. I haven't seen anything in 3 years that tells me he has what it takes to get us to be a serious contended. I hope that changes. But right now, I have more confidence in what Melbourne is doing on and off field to win a Premiership and set themselves up, than what we are.

This is my view. It mirrors Josh's view, and Synbad's view, and the views of many others on here. My frustration is growing rapidly, because I don't want us to muck up a golden opportunity. It seems to me that Josh has the same frustration.


I don't think I need to say any more- many thanks for that summation mate it is spot on. Gerry I also thank you for your input.
There are a few in this thread who have offered snide one- liners and not much depth at all. They know who they are. Remind me of bogan footy dads at the local Under 9's. Learn to correlate your arguments and for them in a rational manner. You really aren't doing yourselves any favours.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Back on topic if we may....

Brenton Sanderson. Are we a chance? Do we have room for him? Would he want to come to us? There is some suggestion he may end up at Collingwood but with Buckley taking over and having senior coaching aspirations of his own, surely Collingwood wouldn't fit the direction he wants to go in?

Thoughts?

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
I reckon with his experience he'd have plenty offer phoenix.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:25 am
Posts: 454
Location: Kalgoorlie, WA
He's apparently pretty highly rated. I'd be happy to have him on board. Depends if we have a spot left in the system for him. Or if by including him we can shuffle positions more to each coach's strength.

Love to get another supposably high-quality individual involved in the club, but only as long as we can utilise him. Don't want too many cooks spoiling the brock.

_________________
I would like to thank Collingwood for helping me keep faith in my old man. He always told me that 'People are thick'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
I'm enjoying the discussion about the functioning of the board and presidency and coaching staff, but I'm not sure opinions are simply black and white. There's many shades of grey in what I think functions and what others think doesn't.
That's healthy. Who know's who is right?

I'm not sure calling posters bogans etc helps the argument any more than what you are actually railing against Josh.

keep up the spirit I say, and argue your point. There's no right or wrong until history judges it so.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
Wild Blue Yonder wrote:
There's no right or wrong until history judges it so.

+1 :clap:

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 16905
This thread is the very reason I am known to but a handful of posters on this forum. Unfortunately, many of you think this forum is a representation of the Carlton Football Club. It's not. The Carlton Football Club has 40,000+ members. This site has around 1,700 who have posted 1 or more times.

It's mid-October. Need I say more.


Last edited by DocSherrin III on Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 34109
Location: Half back flank
I'VE HAD A BEER WITH DOC SHERRIN

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Rexy wrote:
Considering that the assistant coaches have direct input into our players' development I'd hope a rigorous interview process has been the policy all along.


I would not think for a minute that Richardson had to apply for the job and was judged against other candidates through an interview process. He would have been head hunted, this is the role, we want you, do you want us?
That's the process.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28221
woof wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Considering that the assistant coaches have direct input into our players' development I'd hope a rigorous interview process has been the policy all along.


I would not think for a minute that Richardson had to apply for the job and was judged against other candidates through an interview process. He would have been head hunted, this is the role, we want you, do you want us?
That's the process.


The same process that delivered Pagan and would've delivered Voss.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:50 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
Richardson (Development & Strategy & Opposition)
Brown (Backline)
Riley (Midfield)
Barker (Forwards)
Capuano (Rucks)

Then there's all the fitness gurus and development academy....what else do we need?

That looks good to me.

I believe with or wothout the above changes to the coaching panel, I reckon our group would once more improve another 5%.
What I'm hoping with the new voices is that the players improve another 5% because of this.
What I expect will happen is that all the new coaches will add value to other lines other than the line they have been employed to coach & develop.

Furthermore the new voices will help us a bit when we play against Collingwood, Hawthorn and Essendon*, as well as help us adopt some of the successful tactics, just as will Laidler from Geelong and less so from Collins coming from Richmond.

Now Ratts is going to also grow with the new inclusions.

I can't see anything but positives moving forward.

I'm sure we haven't lost ground, or our way in comparison to another cellar dweller on the rise in Melbourne. In fact I see similarities and we're a couple years ahead of them.

We are making ground, and we're a very young group who have tasted finals 2 years running. Not bad for a bunch of kids.

As for Sanderson coming on board...I don't think there's anymore room.

I bet we make the finals and scare the top 4 teams of 2010 next year. I'm expecting Top 4; we're after Footscray, St Kilda or Geelongs spot.

They know we're coming and so say all of us....don't we?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28221
Not that I would know, but who'd be better Sanderson or Riley?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Rexy wrote:
woof wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Considering that the assistant coaches have direct input into our players' development I'd hope a rigorous interview process has been the policy all along.


I would not think for a minute that Richardson had to apply for the job and was judged against other candidates through an interview process. He would have been head hunted, this is the role, we want you, do you want us?
That's the process.


The same process that delivered Pagan and would've delivered Voss.


The same one that delivered Swan or Cordy, you target who you want and you see if they are interested, if they are they get the job. It is not always right but it is how it works.
Process is such a bullshit word.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28221
:lol:

Have to respectfully disagree woof. Due diligence, dot the i's cross the t's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
I reckon a top 4 spot is there for the taking heres why

Geelong- After a long period of success and after the unheavals of the summer will suffer a let down and fall to the lower reaches of the eight

Footscray- Close but no cigar, have reached thier peak and ready to slide down the ladder

Collingwood- Will suffer a massive premiership hangover, also last year of the Malthouse/ Buckly transfer will lead to instability

I think St Kilda will be thereabouts but two years into a GF and lost both times will play on thier minds.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:10 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
I agree BM. This is our moment. I reckon top 4 has to be the aim


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 16905
CK95 wrote:
I'VE HAD A BEER WITH DOC SHERRIN


... :lol: ...seeing as that beer was with Geoff Southby as well, always nice of you to remember CK!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:19 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 8958
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Siegfried wrote:
Indeed. The rebirth came on the back of a man who was able to instill some confidence and process off field, and a raft of young kids who started to make an impact on the field, yielding some results.

The question in my mind is are we doing everything we can to set us up for a sustained period of excellence AND win Premierships AND become an off-field powerhouse (membership, financial, culture etc). Look at the previous Premiers and see how they got that so right - Brisbane, Sydney, Geelong and Collingwood. Hawthorn made difficult, major decisions on and off the field, much initially driven by a board member (Dunstall). It included a change of president, change of coach (with thorough selection process) and major financial initiatives that boosted coffers and membership.

I think what Josh is pointing out very strongly is what a lot of us have been saying on here for a while, that the systems we need to become a powerhouse are not where they need to be (eg the process that gave Ratten the job, twice extending Ratten's contract when it wasn't necessary, the process that would have given Voss the job had he wanted it, appointing a coaching panel with mostly no experience, giving favour to ex-Carlton people (look at Geelong's appointment of Scott, being a favourite son was irrelevant) etc). At the end of the day, it is the Board which is resposible for those decisions. Even if Swann makes a decision himself, the Board still needs to ratify such appointments. Had the Board not prematurely extended Ratten's contract, he almost certainly wouldn't be coach going into 2011. That says something.

Josh's passion comes from his frustration at what he sees as the shortcomings at the Club that have yet to be addressed. Ditto Synbad. I have always found Josh to be a very rational, reasoned poster. His passion and frustration is much more evident of late, and seems to have aroused the ire of some on here. I think I understand where that frustration is coming from, for I too share it. It is the knowledge that we have a golden opportunity over the next 5-8 years to win a Premiership, hopefully more than one. But we need to do everything right to make that happen, on field and off. If we don't get the right decision makers in place, to drive this Club the way it needs to be driven, we will turn around in 10 years time and be shattered that we had some of the best talent in the competition but couldn't win a flag. My father, who has been watching Carlton play for 70 years, does not believe we have the right people in place, starting with the President.

It is absolutely imperative NOW that we have the right people making the right decisions and implementing the right processes. There is an urgency now that wasn't there 5 years ago because now is the time we need to be capitalising and winning Premierships. I do not believe that Kernahan is the right person to be President, and I have stated that numnerous times on this forum since I joined in its previous incarnation. I have no idea about the rest of the indivuduals on the Board, other than it seems there are too many on it. But the Board as a whole has endorsed a number of decisions that I think were not in the best interest of the Club. Recent appointments of assistant coaches are IMHO much better decisions, so hopefully the Board is learning. But we no longer have 5 years to learn and get it right, we must get it right now.

As for the coach, this has been debated at length. I haven't seen anything in 3 years that tells me he has what it takes to get us to be a serious contended. I hope that changes. But right now, I have more confidence in what Melbourne is doing on and off field to win a Premiership and set themselves up, than what we are.

This is my view. It mirrors Josh's view, and Synbad's view, and the views of many others on here. My frustration is growing rapidly, because I don't want us to muck up a golden opportunity. It seems to me that Josh has the same frustration.



THat is not saying anything at all. It is just your opinion not fact.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 7864
Josh Kaplan wrote:
I agree BM. This is our moment. I reckon top 4 has to be the aim


Me too. Some years are easier than others. Although we won more games in 2009 than 2010, we probably performed better overall in 2010, as it was a tougher year (no clubs tanking, the established contenders thereabouts, a few teams rising quickly).

Next year looks to be an easier year. Hard to believe that St Kilda and Bulldogs and Geelong can hang on for ever (lots of their better players moving on or coming to an end).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:04 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
BlueMark wrote:
Also do not forget it was not that long ago that many were keen for us to move to the Gold Coast in oreder to 'save' the club.


many? nonsense.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1599 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 80  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AGRO, bender, Crusader, daggs001 and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group