Form slump. Let sack him. Sounds logical.
| TalkingCarlton https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Sack Betts Petition https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=28672 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Virgin Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Sack Betts Petition |
Fair dinkum this guy has done SFA since getting his lucrative deal. Trade him for something we need |
|
| Author: | jimmy3741 [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Form slump. Let sack him. Sounds logical.
|
|
| Author: | Navy Blue Horse [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
VB hasn't made a decent post in weeks. Let's get rid of him. |
|
| Author: | camel [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
This thread > 
|
|
| Author: | DocSherrin III [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Offer us something for pick four, says Worsfold http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/101135/default.aspx |
|
| Author: | Blue Steel [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
you know what opinions are like? Ar$eholes. And yours is particularly stinky. Delete thread. |
|
| Author: | bosman [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Navy Blue Horse wrote: VB hasn't made a decent post in weeks. Let's get rid of him. 
|
|
| Author: | Lurker Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Virgin Blue wrote: Sack Betts Virgin Blue wrote: Trade him Sack Betts, or trade him? Two completely different propositions. |
|
| Author: | Virgin Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Still hasn't done a thing |
|
| Author: | Buzza4 [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Virgin Blue wrote: Fair dinkum this guy has done SFA since getting his lucrative deal. Trade him for something we need F*&^%ng ridiculous post. |
|
| Author: | Virgin Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Once again the majority of TCers show they know SFA Betts is one good $$$ and has done SFA for about 6 weeks and before that got most of his goals in junk time He is a class player but has done SFA and is overrated Get rid of him. Would get us something good and with Garlett and Yarran at club we don't lose anything by getting rid of him |
|
| Author: | Glen [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
I should be smacked for even reading this postī¼ |
|
| Author: | Slyuss [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Betts is an absolute disgrace. Typical selfish prick... takes the $1.9M and does sweet f*** all. Make some room for somebody who cares and get the f*** out of my football club Betts |
|
| Author: | Effes [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Unbelievable. Thanks Eddie |
|
| Author: | Virgin Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Bruc Mac "Betts has had 3 sitters tonight" |
|
| Author: | Effes [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Finally finished it off. |
|
| Author: | Virgin Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Technically flawed set shot at goa all yearl, runs too far to the right and angles it in. Terrible technique a la Buddy lucky to get that one but seriously a grand ma could snag that and then he throws it Missed from 40m earlier didnt even make distance |
|
| Author: | Mrs Caz [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
*censored my own post * |
|
| Author: | Virgin Blue [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Fair to say had Betts kicked 2 gls he should have kicked, and had he not missed that undroppable mark early we would have got across the line Thing most TCers dont understand is there is a difference between being talented and a good player vs being worth the $$$ one is on, and in my opinion Betts is a downhill skiier whose gls mostly come late in games as opposed to early when the heat is on and certainly ever since he got his big bucks he has done SFA Is he just out of form? Is it just a slump? I'd argue even if he pops up and kicks 4 gls next week with 3 late in game that is not enough to justify his standing in the team in terms of $$$s and also experience. He is one of the few players tonight to play 100 games for CFC but he did bugger all He needs to play like a 100 game high priced star early in games and set the tone to make me impressed otherwise I would gladly trade him bec Yazz has even more talent and Garlett is just a little gun 3 gls again tonight |
|
| Author: | teagueyubeauty [ Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Sack Betts Petition |
Slyuss wrote: Betts is an absolute disgrace. Mate, he plays for Carlton not Gold Coast. Did we sign him for 5 years or something Typical selfish prick... takes the $1.9M and does sweet f*** all. Make some room for somebody who cares and get the f*** out of my football club Betts 
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|