Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 6:55 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 701 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 36  Next

To tank or not to tank???
YES - lets get picks 1 and 2 this year and be a force for the next 10 seasons 42%  42%  [ 77 ]
NO - we will be right with what we've got 58%  58%  [ 106 ]
Total votes : 183
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
Electric Blue wrote:
If we get thumped this week, expect this thread to get a workout from all the rats who were there after the Geelong game.



oh dear :roll:


so what colour hybrid do you drive?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
blu944 wrote:
Electric Blue wrote:
If we get thumped this week, expect this thread to get a workout from all the rats who were there after the Geelong game.



oh dear :roll:


so what colour hybrid do you drive?


Whoooosh..... :?

I would love to 'get' this, please explain?

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:36 pm
Posts: 1289
Location: here
Electric Blue wrote:
blu944 wrote:
Electric Blue wrote:
If we get thumped this week, expect this thread to get a workout from all the rats who were there after the Geelong game.



oh dear :roll:


so what colour hybrid do you drive?


Whoooosh..... :?

I would love to 'get' this, please explain?


Is this turning into a global warming thread?

_________________
They coud'nt.....could they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
I can't believe we are having a vote about tanking or not tanking lol

Has St Kilda won a GF from all their draft picks, that is no

Blues need to learn how to win this year not how to loose. Gotta get that winning spirit back at the club, the arrogance :)

Whoever would want carlton to tank for draft picks obviously hasnt hurt much the past couple years.

Blues are looking at finals next year, need a few wins this year to propel them into next years season. Gibbsy came here to win premier ship not spoons. He will go back to crows if we not successful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:39 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:29 pm
Posts: 391
I'm thinking about our list after todays game and am sorry to say but we have a LONG way to go.

Those of you who want us to win more than 4 games this season dont truly care about the club.

We need more young guns. Our current list of youngsters aremy good enough.

_________________
Walk on, Walk on,
With hope, in your heart,
And you'll never walk alone,
YOU'LL NEVER WALK ALONE!!!

08/02/1981 - GATE 7...Our brothers will never be forgotten!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
GAVROMAN wrote:
Those of you who want us to win more than 4 games this season dont truly care about the club.


Nice post. :roll:

And exactly where were you last week?

:garthp:

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:47 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
GAVROMAN wrote:
I'm thinking about our list after todays game and am sorry to say but we have a LONG way to go.

Those of you who want us to win more than 4 games this season dont truly care about the club.

We need more young guns. Our current list of youngsters aremy good enough.


They are good, it's just that they are still teenagers and shouldn't be asked to chase two of the top 5 players in the comp around.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:56 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:29 pm
Posts: 391
We dont have the list to move forward.

Why is that so hard to see???

_________________
Walk on, Walk on,
With hope, in your heart,
And you'll never walk alone,
YOU'LL NEVER WALK ALONE!!!

08/02/1981 - GATE 7...Our brothers will never be forgotten!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
GAVROMAN wrote:
We dont have the list to move forward.

Why is that so hard to see???


If you seriously think we don't have the list to move forward, or the foundations of a good to great list, then you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

I take it you don't think we've improved one iota since last year?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10326
Location: Coburg
8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:12 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:00 pm
Posts: 391
GAVROMAN wrote:
We dont have the list to move forward.

Why is that so hard to see???


what are you talking about?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
bluebeard wrote:
Electric Blue wrote:
blu944 wrote:
Electric Blue wrote:
If we get thumped this week, expect this thread to get a workout from all the rats who were there after the Geelong game.



oh dear :roll:


so what colour hybrid do you drive?


Whoooosh..... :?

I would love to 'get' this, please explain?


Is this turning into a global warming thread?


Nope, South Park joke, methinks.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
GAVROMAN wrote:
Quote:
We dont have the list to move forward.

Why is that so hard to see???


Ahhh so lets get 1st round pics for the next 5 years and you will still complain that we dont have the list when there experience lets them down in a game. We lack quality leaders and senior players and Westcoast is one team which will expose us on that.

At this stage it would be good to mix in some experienced players of quality to help guide and grow our young fleet of stars.

We have been severly exposed with Stevo goin down and Kouta out for an extended period. With Lance struggling in his own form. We are left with Fev, Lappin and Scotland.

This is our list of Senior Players over 25
Kouta - Last year and not playing at present
Fev - Playing but has a lot of pressure on him every week.
Whitnall - Captain and struggling in his own form lucky to be getting a game
Scotto - Been good on his own game strong in defence
Lappin - Last 2 games been good which i am glad has found some form.
Stevo - Our best onfield leader especially for our young midfield kids out for season
Teague - Not even in seniors
Saddington - Not even in seniors

Pretty thin line up to guiding our kids especially when only 3 or Whits, Scotto and Fev are playing and one is horribly out of form.

Out of the Westcoast team and lets include 2 exceptions for what they are
Judd and Kerr yep 24 but seasoned veterens and 2 best midfielders in competition.
Add to over 25 List - Cox, Glass, Braun, Stenglein, Chick, Jones, Embly, Hunter and Wirrupunda.

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:53 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:47 pm
Posts: 228
Location: Perth
gavroman read my post on page 2 again.

then look at how great our some of our high draft picks have turned out (hmm murray vance? luke livingstone? sporn?) they mean better odds in the lottery, not the guranteed jackpot.

an array of wooden spoons is no pre requisite for success, none of the top clubs right now hav won any recent wooden spoons.

finally wheres your pride?there is no way you can be enjoying our 6th year down the bottom. Where the greatest club in the world remember?

your a flower mate i reckon you should stick to soccer

_________________
thats pretty bad-ass!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:54 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
If our recruiters actually became clever then perhaps the idea of tanking might not be raised so much.

I find it highly ironic that the proponents of the "our list is good enough already" or "with clever recruiting, it will be" theory fail to acknowledge that most of the improvement of our list is coming from priority selections. Apart from the O'hAilpins; (which cost us virtually nothing) since when has our recruiting been especially brave or 'clever' for that matter? We haven't had a Vance or Massie or a Livingstone for a while now (we hope 8) ), nevertheless, the list of players we should have drafted continues to grow.

If those same Carlton fans I referred to in my second sentence were more critical or constructive regarding some of our drafting selections and recruiting tactics then I'd give them more respect. Instead, all we get is that same old ‘Catch-22’ regarding Vance and Massie and the like.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:27 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Simpson.

Bentick.

Carazzo.

Simpson.

Were they high draft picks?

Players like these are responsible for us improving and moving up as much as the Murphys and Gibbs'.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:06 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
Carlton must concentrate in trying to secure two or three top players With some mongrel in them from the National AFL Draft next year and forget that stupid idea about that no player over twenty four years old will be picked up as in my opinion that was the most stupid idea the Club made last year, this year the Club must concentrate on the center halfback position as both Waite and Whitnall were found wanted so far and I just cant understand why Saddington is not playing in that possition yet.

We need more strong experience players in the side and what do we do we loose Stevens and then we add another kid in Joe Anderson now I’m not knocking the kid but I feel we have too many kids in the side as it is, Saddington and/or Bannister should have been in as they would have balanced the side better.

Were I feel Clubs like St Kilda Geelong etc. gone wrong in recent years was that they just concentrated in youth alone and forgot about the balance that a team must have, teams must have experienced strong bodies to go with these young kids otherwise you will burn half of these players before they had time to mature.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:17 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
GAVROMAN wrote:
I'm thinking about our list after todays game and am sorry to say but we have a LONG way to go.

Those of you who want us to win more than 4 games this season dont truly care about the club.

We need more young guns. Our current list of youngsters aremy good enough.


alright, this guy is a troll/alt of another member.

had to be with such statements.

but this is what i liked most
Quote:
Our current list of youngsters aremy good enough


i point out this one word - youngsters.

its simple, twice, when we play a side with mature bodies, we are shown to be the young side we are.

even then, i dont think it was as bad as it was on the score board.

the third quater cost us, not them scoring, but us missing goals.

there was a stage where we "should" have been under 2 goals of WC instead we found ourselves 8 goals down.

The passage.

1. When Waite scored the goal was dissallowed. (Result, they went down and scored - 2 goal turn around)

2. Murphy Shot on Goal, missed. (result, they went down and scored, 2 goal turn around)

3. Waite shot on goal, should have scored (Result, they went down and scored - 2 goal turn around)

At that stage in the game, if we had of taken our chances, the result would have been a WC lead of no more than 2 goals.

That was where the game was won and lost. Instead of being 2 goals down, we where 8 goals down.

We, as a young side, need to learn to take our chances when we did, and against sides like WC, you dont get two chances.

We have a long way to go, and loses to Geelong & WC, show us that, and show us how far we have to go, but we are headed in the right directions. At times we where good, at times we are bad.

Jackovish, summed it up perfectly IMO.

his statement was something along the lines, Carlton has to learn that the difference between their best and their worst is very little (like WC). Once they learn that, they have the talent to win and beat most sides in the comp.

Our best, with the current team (which will only get better with age and experience) is as good as any side going around, yes, even WC IMO, however our worst, is alsto the worst in the competition.

We dont need to climb that gap to make our best as good as WC, we need to climb our gap that makes our worst, better than what it is, and that, will come with time, and experience.

p.s. Pagan. Why? Why do you have Waite in the forward line when he was killing it in the NAB across half back. Move him back, leave Kennedy on the ground with Fev up front and let the side develop.

p.p.s. If we can take a positive, its that Gibbs, Murphy, Russell all got a glimps of what is need to be an elite footballer having played on Kerr or Judd. Learn from it, see how they do things, and they all have the potential to be as good.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:54 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
i reckon the three shining lights for us this year (in terms of consistancy) have been Thornton, O'Halphin & Fisher........................

Two were rookies & one was a late pick in the 70's.
It was just good old fashioned recruiting. :)

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:06 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 20972
Location: Missing Kouta
No, good recruiting is more important as the following quote proves.
Eagles can play, but must they also pay?
Quote:
West Coast won last year's flag with only two players who were top-10 draft picks. One of them, Drew Banfield, was as old as Methuselah and is now a television boundary rider. Apart from Chris Judd, third pick in the 2001 draft, the Eagles have Ben Cousins, acquired through the good fortune of the father-son rule, and David Wirrpanda, who was a compensatory draft pick in the early Fremantle days. The rest of their team was cobbled together through trades, double-digit draft selections and the rookie draft.

We'd be better off trading Fisher and Waite for good second round picks because they're not as good as their reputations suggest.

It worked for the Hawks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 701 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluedog, Irblue and 302 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group