TalkingCarlton
https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

"Pies got off lightly" - Herald Sun
https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1351		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  fevolaaaa [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:44 am ]
Post subject:  "Pies got off lightly" - Herald Sun
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,12825211%255E19742,00.html

Quote:
The problem for Mick is that Collingwood was treated very well.

Let's look at the infamous third quarter .

On my assessment, Collingwood was awarded nine free kicks to Carlton's 10. One of the Pies free kicks was unwarranted.

Lance Whitnall was penalised for deliberate out of bounds late in the term, resulting in a free kick to Magpie Leon Davis who passed to Brodie Holland in the goal square.

This was a critical decision resulting in a goal.

Overall, a great quarter of high scoring, intense footy and 18 correct free kicks paid with only four errors – the free kick to Davis plus two missed frees to Carlton (one a 50m penalty which should have gone against Anthony Rocca for claiming Trent Sporn when he wasn't in the marking contest) and one unwarranted free to Carlton's Nick Stevens against Paul Licuria for holding the man


Thank god sanity prevails. If only the AFL world would be awake to it
Author:  camel [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:59 am ]
Post subject: 
I think the most important bit about that article is this:
Quote:
Comment by former field umpire Derek Humphery-Smith


Onya Derek. 8)

That Whitnall decision really was a shocker. :garthp:
Author:  TruBlueBrad [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:06 am ]
Post subject: 
One of the worst umpires ever. Interesting though
Author:  thegezman [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:11 am ]
Post subject: 
to be honest i thought we got a better run with the umpires, but there were an amazing amount of shocking calls, in both directions really.

still i think we benefited more from them over all
Author:  The Vet [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 11:10 am ]
Post subject: 
good article, with which I agree. The Rocca one was blatant, and lance's handball took a 90 degree turn on its third bounce to go over. Havin g said that we did not lose because of the umpires.

P.S. what is with the :garthp:?
Author:  phoenix johnson [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
The Vet wrote:
good article, with which I agree. The Rocca one was blatant, and lance's handball took a 90 degree turn on its third bounce to go over. Havin g said that we did not lose because of the umpires.

P.S. what is with the :garthp:?


:garthp:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Author:  Kouta [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Collingwood win by 20 points and they still whinge, it's not as if the umpires cost them the game. :roll:
Author:  thehalford [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
The Vet wrote:
P.S. what is with the :garthp:?


Seriously, garth p was a TBV poster who hasn't found his way to here. Saint supporter, and half of the posts were :roll: . The other half were calling us flower and the like. So, in homage to a great man, :roll: is now denoted as :garthp:

:lol:
Author:  Blue Bird [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
Agree Camel glad someone mentioned the Whitnall decision. An absolute shocker.
Author:  The Vet [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
got it!
Author:  Bluesboy70 [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
Instead of bitching about the umpiring, maybe we should look at why our opposition who havent kicked 15 goals in their last 4 quarters of football previously were allowed to kick that very same amount of goals in a HALF of football
Author:  Ponkstar [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
I loved Wallsy's article too. Obviously he was really pissed off about 3AW being banned from interviews after the game and decided to have another crack at Malthouse.

Don't expect Wallsy lining up for Channel Nine at any stage soon.
Author:  Kouta [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:46 pm ]
Post subject: 
The Vet wrote:
P.S. what is with the :garthp:?

He's mainly on BigFooty and still finishing with :roll: :garthP:
Author:  lucablue [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Agree Camel glad someone mentioned the Whitnall decision. An absolute shocker.

Did my ears deceive me or did Mark Harvey state this evening on White Line Fever that the Whitnall deliberate decision was a correct one - followed it up by saying that boundary umpires throw the ball in too often.

You're a f*cking genius Harvey, I only prey that you get the gig after Essendon* finish bottom 3 this year & Sheeds gets the arse.
Author:  BlueWorld [ Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
Wouldn't have said it if it had been a bumber player.
Author:  Wild Blue Yonder [ Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:07 am ]
Post subject: 
One of my long term pleasures is awaiting the appointment of Harvey to Essendon*'s senior coach when they work out Sheedy should have gone 5 years ago.

They don't come any thicker.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/