DocSherrin III wrote:
keogh wrote:
One coach is sacked
Another coach is appointed
And nothing will change until that board is gone and people with footy acumen come on board
In all seriousness, we keep hearing this from you, but there comes a point whereby you have to name names. The vast majority of board members are successful business people that have a specialty field whether it be business, law, accounting, construction etc, etc. For comparison's sake - at the Pies, they have Paul Licuria on the board - but post-footy he set up his own business, became a pilot, got an MBA. He'd probably be a decent sounding board, but he was just a footballer who's been out of the game for 20 years. What sort of footy acumen do you think Collingwood relies on Paul to provide? The answer is, they likely don't.
Yes, he's a past player but it's his business acumen that has him on the board since 2018 with a skill set that encompasses acquisitions, planning, funding, marketing and project management. I like the fact that our CEO has great footy acumen. I'm not convinced we need ex-players as board members unless they have some runs on the board in the real world.
Ian Prendergast
Look if 25 years of sackings of coaches fitness staff head of football doesn’t prove the @#$%&! obvious well…
And you know that the board has set themselves up to be hard to dislodge if a ticket is formed
25 @#$%&! years
One Preliminary Final
And what’s the one common denominator…
Some people can work it out in 5 minutes mate
They can smell the BS from 10 miles
I can name the board members and their history if you want
But why
What does it matter
They have failed
Some were there when they gave Voss the job but offered Kingsley the assistance role after he had been passed over yet again
As someone said the other day
Why is it so hard?
Exactly
Synbad and myself were saying this was the problem 20 years ago