Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2024 3:55 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 8:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14510
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Jacobs is quite possibly the best player I have ever seen

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 8:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 16828
Location: Left Cuckistan
Second best player of the modern era. After Seedsman.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:22 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14510
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
mmm dunno, whenever sauce plays radelaide smash us!

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1654
keogh wrote:
It all starts from the top in any profession that doesn't meet it's objectives
You could write a book about it
To me the Warnock and Judd deals symbolise where the club has gone wrong
Shortsighted
Quick fix
Poor recruiting
You name it
And it will continue until wise people run the club

Keogh,
With all due respect you suffer from blissful hindsight clarity. It allows you to go back to 2008 and say "no" we don't want a Judd in our team".
Who would say that?
As for Sauce, Bluedog is right, serviceable

Keogh, get fixated on this that came later:
1. Poor recruiting
2. GC and GWS diluting the talent
3. A learning OTJ Senior Coach

There's your reason that Sticks et al. stinks


Last edited by TomAlvin'sWig on Sat May 31, 2014 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:50 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Jacobs is an average ruckman.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 12:34 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Al pacino and wig are wrong
Jacobs is a superb tap ruckman better than kruez warnock and hampson
The club stuffed up getting warnock...too many picks and money for no need
Paid too much for judd in kennedy
Recruited and list managed around judd poorly
Club fully failed to build a premiership list and so all responsible must fall on their sword


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 12:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6028
Exactly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 12:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
moshe25 wrote:
Jacobs is an average ruckman.


..he is better than average, he has performed better than knockers to date, at any rate..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 12:51 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Judd was needed to turn the culture around, but we blinked in negotiations and so got shafted. Kennedy was not the only way to get the deal done.
2006 Hampson at pick no 17 what a joke. Unproven player at 17. What were they thinking. But having thought he was good enough for 17 pick, what do we do?
2007 Kreuzer the following year at number 1 made a mockery of picking hampson at 17
2008 warnock for our first 2 draft picks. Was hampson a dud? Was Kreuzer a bust? Was jacobs useless? If they thought any if those things then the warnock trade made sense. Why then did it take them another 5 years to get rid of hampson? Kreuzer was playing good football, as was jacobs. Explain the rationale...you simply cant.
Simply it was dumb , arrogant , lazy recruiting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 1:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
list management dumb

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
padre wrote:
Judd was needed to turn the culture around, but we blinked in negotiations and so got shafted. Kennedy was not the only way to get the deal done.
2006 Hampson at pick no 17 what a joke. Unproven player at 17. What were they thinking. But having thought he was good enough for 17 pick, what do we do?
2007 Kreuzer the following year at number 1 made a mockery of picking hampson at 17
2008 warnock for our first 2 draft picks. Was hampson a dud? Was Kreuzer a bust? Was jacobs useless? If they thought any if those things then the warnock trade made sense. Why then did it take them another 5 years to get rid of hampson? Kreuzer was playing good football, as was jacobs. Explain the rationale...you simply cant.
Simply it was dumb , arrogant , lazy recruiting.


Warnock was not required at time, and I reckon that was Ratt's call. Strange at the time & still so in hindsight.
We held onto Hampson when PTA were calling & willing to give up pick#9 & likely offers made on MK. Really bad list management with our ruckmen due to the previous lack of rucks in the mid-2000's. Feast or famine.
All are good #1 ruckmen, we now need to use our nous to select another for development to take over the role.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:23 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Jacobs is an average ruckman.


..he is better than average, he has performed better than knockers to date, at any rate..

Is he in the top 6 or 7 ruckman in the AFL?

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:30 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..which ones..?..

..on this year's form I'd have Jacobs a shade ahead of knockers.... ..on career, Jacobs ahead....

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 18621
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..which ones..?..

..on this year's form I'd have Jacobs a shade ahead of knockers.... ..on career, Jacobs ahead....


Champion Data had Jacobs ranked as the 21st best ruckman for the 2013 season after being ranked 8th after the 2012 season. Don't know how he ranks this season.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Effes wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..which ones..?..

..on this year's form I'd have Jacobs a shade ahead of knockers.... ..on career, Jacobs ahead....


Champion Data had Jacobs ranked as the 21st best ruckman for the 2013 season after being ranked 8th after the 2012 season. Don't know how he ranks this season.


..2012 has been his strongest year, I would say that year was better than knockers' 2011.. ..Jacobs and the team dropped off last year.. ..knockers has only put almost one season worth of footy together, 2011, otherwise he averages about half a season per year.. ..durability and consistency go a long way..

..knockers drafted in 2005, 79 games.. ....not exactly a strong career to date..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 2:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 18621
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..knockers drafted in 2005, 79 games.. ....not exactly a strong career to date..


Lots of ruckmen around the comp have missed a large amount of games; Leuenberger, Mumford, Kreuzer, Sandilands, D Simpson, Z Smith, Natanui, Pyke.

Not many durable rucks around besides Cox, Minson and Goldstein.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 3:01 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
moshe25 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Jacobs is an average ruckman.


..he is better than average, he has performed better than knockers to date, at any rate..

Is he in the top 6 or 7 ruckman in the AFL?

We'll?? Is he? Not on those Champion Data figures, he's not. Average ruckman, wouldn't you say?

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 3:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
moshe25 wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Jacobs is an average ruckman.


..he is better than average, he has performed better than knockers to date, at any rate..

Is he in the top 6 or 7 ruckman in the AFL?

We'll?? Is he? Not on those Champion Data figures, he's not. Average ruckman, wouldn't you say?


..I said he is better than average, not that he is top 6 or 7 out of 50+ rucks in the system.. .you said that.. ..hot tip, neither is knockers, and for the big picture of his recruitment, he better crack into the very good to top rucks in the second half of his career, cos he has been very, very average to date..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Effes wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..knockers drafted in 2005, 79 games.. ....not exactly a strong career to date..


Lots of ruckmen around the comp have missed a large amount of games; Leuenberger, Mumford, Kreuzer, Sandilands, D Simpson, Z Smith, Natanui, Pyke.

Not many durable rucks around besides Cox, Minson and Goldstein.


..krooz has played 106, with two years less in system and an acl, now broken foot.. ..yes rucks have injuries, but knockers has given a paltry return for years in the system.. ..he has so far only had one season where he played most of he year..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2014 3:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 23030
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
Have a look at the players available after pick 23 the year we got Warnock( we used pick 24 as a trade)

It's reading that brings a tear to the eye
We had Jacobs but treated him like shit when Warnock arrived and consequently big sauce left
You want me to expand on that ask me

As we saw from last weeks match Jacobs is a superior player to knockers
Dumb dumb dumb


I was at yhe game, watched the replay twice and still cant believe the stats.

I say that Warnock beat Jacobs in the ruck and Jacobs' possessions, whilst impressive at 22 did not hurt us.
When Jacobs was in the ruck against Casboult they got a bit of a run on. Cometh warnock and Jacobs had some stiff competition.

I bet some of the taps won by Warnock were given to Jacobs...and I did some rough counting and gave up when it was obvious what was going on with the HO stats.

By the way I wish we had kept Jacobs and pick 24.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group