I think Synbad's first post on the issue of women's football covered it.
He doesn't understand it, doesn't know anything about it, doesn't know if it would work or not and can't be stuffed finding out.
Apart from that, he's all over it.
| TalkingCarlton https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) https://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=35275 |
Page 19 of 20 |
| Author: | cimm1979 [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
I think Synbad's first post on the issue of women's football covered it. He doesn't understand it, doesn't know anything about it, doesn't know if it would work or not and can't be stuffed finding out. Apart from that, he's all over it.
|
|
| Author: | teagueyubeauty [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
|
|
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
Of course i understand it. Think back twenty years ago what the game was like Close your eyes and look into the future and imagine the politically correct game were going to have. And the broke clubs and competition Lol |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
Teh women Tehy cant do nuthin right Lol |
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
If the women are playing footy who is going to cut the oranges? |
|
| Author: | teagueyubeauty [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
The midgets? |
|
| Author: | Rexy [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Muslims ? |
|
| Author: | The Normal One [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
The Synbads? |
|
| Author: | Rod Waddell [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
Is this thread still going? MODS please shut down. |
|
| Author: | Braithy [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
lets not lose our heads here. we're only getting started. |
|
| Author: | Clayman [ Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
Rod Waddell wrote: Is this thread still going? MODS please shut down. Might as well shut the site down too 
|
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
grrofunger wrote: If the women are playing footy who is going to cut the oranges? Women already play football.. I'm not sure what your point is.. Are you portending that you're progressive because women will be adopted by a male competition and breastfed? Because they can't get it going themselves in your opinion? My oh my! |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
What comes after a double-down? Because Synners just did it |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
jimmae wrote: Teh women Tehy cant do nuthin right Lol Lame humor and your logic was non existent through this Can you show us evidence and data that a skint Carlton adopting women's teams will be good for Carlton? You still haven't illustrated how that will happen exactly. Who conducted the study into this by Carlton? Straight out deflecting won't work |
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
cimm1979 wrote: I think Synbad's first post on the issue of women's football covered it. He doesn't understand it, doesn't know anything about it, doesn't know if it would work or not and can't be stuffed finding out. Apart from that, he's all over it. You're welcome to show how it's going to work exactly |
|
| Author: | bluedog [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
grrofunger wrote: If the women are playing footy who is going to cut the oranges? 
|
|
| Author: | Synbad [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
Funny is if women aren't playing afl football they're deemed orange cutters by you blokes though Why aren't you getting along to watch them now? I doubt any of you blokes have paid to go and watch a women's game of football |
|
| Author: | grrofunger [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
get your head out of your arse , it was a joke |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
Synbad wrote: jimmae wrote: Teh women Tehy cant do nuthin right Lol Lame humor and your logic was non existent through this Can you show us evidence and data that a skint Carlton adopting women's teams will be good for Carlton? You still haven't illustrated how that will happen exactly. Who conducted the study into this by Carlton? Straight out deflecting won't work I don't actually need to point anything out, because it's already happening, and will receive AFL and government funding. |
|
| Author: | teagueyubeauty [ Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | R2: Carlton v Sydney (Post-Match discussion) |
I gave you a couple of stats on the previous page, 7 times more likely to go or become a member if they play the game. More women playing can only be a good thing naturally based in the first stat. One of only 3 Melbourne afl women's clubs for x number of years... I'm just in IT management, got no idea about marketing but even I can think up of a myriad of ways to take advantage of that. If Geelong can 39% of their membership being female then why can't we? Coming from way back at 28% but this would be a free kick. Play out of princes park, making use of facilities that are free for us anyway.. It's a no brainer, but because you don't like the board you don't want to think about it being a positive. That's your prerogative. |
|
| Page 19 of 20 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|