Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 4:35 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:43 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Cons: Short term pain

Pros: Long term gain

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:46 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Synbad wrote:
bax wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If we had lost the midfield and not a couple of tall defenders id agree.

If we had lost Fev and Judd id agree.


So what youre saying is Brisbane didnt have players out and our players played to the best of their abilities but wernt good enough ???

Keep it in perspective.

Brisbane had players out and players under an injury cloud...Brisbane is who we played!

We didnt get the most out of our players.
Our players didnt get the most out of themselves.
Our tactics were flawed.. as they have been all year.
Our players are not conditioned to run hard.

Im waiting for the spin doctoring....


No spin doctoring, but seriously you'd think we should be on top of the ladder the way you carry on sometimes.

All your comments can be attributed to any team at any time of the year. Let me know your solution to our problems and I'll direct Brett Ratten end the MC to this site :thumbsup: .

Waite and Jamison were massive outs this year and anyone that thought we'd go deep into September without them had rocks in their head. I'm so pissed off we lost it's not funny but put the season in perspective and we're on the right track.

How would we have won with Waite and Jamo in the side... the game changed through the middle in the last... We went short and we got overun....thats where we lost the game...!!!

And no wwere not on the right track.. UNLESS we know how to play the game...were jusst on a track...

Your off on the wrong tangent again Synbad
Jamison and Waite provide the foil for the big forwards who are vital in finals games
Bradshaw kicked the last 2 goals. Jamison on bradshaw would have limited that. The Brisbane knock on style is built around guts and determination. The bradshw goals were high in, hence the big back required. To say that only the midfiled is the key is tripe quite frankly

And yes
the MC and the coach and the players are definately on the right track

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:57 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sydney
Pros

The look of anguish/heartbreak on the players faces - Fev and Co looked close to tears - Expect this to galvanise the team over summer for future years - Yes finals are expected and so is success but you will never ever get anywhere if its easy - they now know its not easy.

Gibbs is showing signs that his core strength is getting Judd like - barring injury he will be unstoppable in the future.

Cons

Our medical staff - AJ isnt a sook and he clearly has done damage to his ankle - how much more has he done :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
So waite and jamo would have held brown and bradshaw right?

just like all the other games?

dreaming,,,,

the gane was lost in the middle,.

black kills us our lack of discipline kills us... our lack of run kills us.. and our lack of structure and nouse kills us...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
bax wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If we had lost the midfield and not a couple of tall defenders id agree.

If we had lost Fev and Judd id agree.


So what youre saying is Brisbane didnt have players out and our players played to the best of their abilities but wernt good enough ???

Keep it in perspective.

Brisbane had players out and players under an injury cloud...Brisbane is who we played!

We didnt get the most out of our players.
Our players didnt get the most out of themselves.
Our tactics were flawed.. as they have been all year.
Our players are not conditioned to run hard.

Im waiting for the spin doctoring....


No spin doctoring, but seriously you'd think we should be on top of the ladder the way you carry on sometimes.

All your comments can be attributed to any team at any time of the year. Let me know your solution to our problems and I'll direct Brett Ratten end the MC to this site :thumbsup: .

Waite and Jamison were massive outs this year and anyone that thought we'd go deep into September without them had rocks in their head. I'm so pissed off we lost it's not funny but put the season in perspective and we're on the right track.

How would we have won with Waite and Jamo in the side... the game changed through the middle in the last... We went short and we got overun....thats where we lost the game...!!!

And no wwere not on the right track.. UNLESS we know how to play the game...were jusst on a track...



" How would we have won with Waite and Jamo in the side " >>> That comment is seriously a joke isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
MASSIVE PRO

Jordan Russell.

I really hope his performanne last night ends once and for all the knocks on him. Hes taken a while to get there, but he's arrived as a genuine league player.

He along with Judd was probably our most composed player last night.

Well done Jordan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:33 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Not sure if it was just me, but Kreuzer looked really tired.

It's been a tough season for him, to assume the mantle of no. 1 ruck in the absence of Warnock and the development of Hampson and the idiosyncracies of Cloke (for want of a better word).

With Warnock fit, Hampson continuing to develop, I would really like Kreuzer used as a KP forward - we will destroy him and his body if he keeps playing in the ruck from this early on. We had no choice this year but with a fit list, Kreuzer must be used up forward more often.

One of our bravest and most consistent players this year just looked like he'd conked out.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7674
Location: Bendigo
Synbad wrote:
So waite and jamo would have held brown and bradshaw right?

just like all the other games?

dreaming,,,,

the gane was lost in the middle,.

black kills us our lack of discipline kills us... our lack of run kills us.. and our lack of structure and nouse kills us...

Thank Christ its Ratts in the box and not you or one of your cronies, Synbad. Add Waite and Jamo to our backline and we're a LOT stronger across half back and in the square with Krooz not having to drop so deep.

Our best structure is with Jamo/Bower doubling the deepest option and Thornton/Waite doing the same to the highest. Bower played out of his skin last night. He was hobbled early in the last, but gutted it out.

I hope you don't get a ticket to #17.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
CarltonClem wrote:
Not sure if it was just me, but Kreuzer looked really tired.

It's been a tough season for him, to assume the mantle of no. 1 ruck in the absence of Warnock and the development of Hampson and the idiosyncracies of Cloke (for want of a better word).

With Warnock fit, Hampson continuing to develop, I would really like Kreuzer used as a KP forward - we will destroy him and his body if he keeps playing in the ruck from this early on. We had no choice this year but with a fit list, Kreuzer must be used up forward more often.

One of our bravest and most consistent players this year just looked like he'd conked out.


He was one of our best last night.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:58 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 8:31 am
Posts: 332
Location: New South Wales
quote
MASSIVE PRO

Jordan Russell.

I really hope his performanne last night ends once and for all the knocks on him. Hes taken a while to get there, but he's arrived as a genuine league player.

He along with Judd was probably our most composed player last night.

Well done Jordan.
unquote

Agree 100 %

_________________
A macfart a day helps you work rest and play


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:03 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 62
Location: McKinnon, Victoria
Pros:

- Finals for the first time in a long time
- Garlett... looks like he knows where to run to get to the drop of the ball... first rover since Naley at Carlton I reckon.
- New slogan for next year: "Now they know we're really coming... promise"

Cons:

- Terry Wallace vindicated... if the midfielders had run hard back the other way in the 4th quarter, at least half the Bears goals would have been stopped.
- Clangers... Simpson centering the ball to J Brown :confused:, Armfield every kick (and against Adelaide the week before), Walker almost every kick, Judd/Cloke very kickable goals


I just hope the boys have a sombre Mad Monday and get back to business as soon as possible.

- Twinone


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15017
Pros
Walker got through the season unscathed and did a good job on rich for 3 1/2 qrts
Russell
Judd
Fev

Cons
Looked tired
Too many dumb mistakes
Judd's "incident"
Armfield
Simpson's stupid turnover which turned the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:18 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
Pro:
terrific season by the blues - an improvement in many respects and on many indicators.

debate about what we need to do to improve is a good thing and i enjoy most of the posts - whether i agree or not.

however, lets not take ourselves too seriously folks..................... unless of course we have demonstrated the capacity to successfully contribute directly to those formally managing the clubs on and off field fortunes.

....or perhaps i have a got it wrong and those most critical of where we're at are really only taking the piss :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:26 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
london blue wrote:
debate about what we need to do to improve is a good thing and i enjoy most of the posts - whether i agree or not.



Me too.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Synbad wrote:
If we had lost the midfield and not a couple of tall defenders id agree.

If we had lost Fev and Judd id agree.


So what youre saying is Brisbane didnt have players out and our players played to the best of their abilities but wernt good enough ???

Keep it in perspective.

Brisbane had players out and players under an injury cloud...Brisbane is who we played!

We didnt get the most out of our players.
Our players didnt get the most out of themselves.
Our tactics were flawed.. as they have been all year.
Our players are not conditioned to run hard.

Im waiting for the spin doctoring....

They were missing Adcock, Drummond, Leuenberger & Charman.

We were missing Waite, Jamison, Warnock & Hadley.

Comparatively, we were missing more key players, and I would argue a couple of those players are of greater quality than their names.

No spin doctoring, just a very simple comparison.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
Pro's:

It should sting for a long time and be forefront in the minds of the boys over summer.

Con's:

Lions had 17 more tackles.
Gibbs, Garlett and Grigg went missing.
Let opponent constantly move ball through coridor.
1 Qtr of bad footy obliterates 3 Qtrs of good footy.
Delivery to our only legitimate forward was deplorable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
TwinOne wrote:
- Garlett... looks like he knows

How good was Garlett's goal in the first on the run? :eek: :thumbsup:

I haven't seen a Carlton player take a ball on a wing and kick a long goal running flat chat since Bradley, Kouta and Campo were running around.

Lightning pace. :smile:

Garlett has the versality to play up the ground and rotate with Yarran in the next ten years.

Just needs five years in the gym like Walls noted. :grin:

Sack Wayne Hughes. :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
bax wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
Not sure if it was just me, but Kreuzer looked really tired.

It's been a tough season for him, to assume the mantle of no. 1 ruck in the absence of Warnock and the development of Hampson and the idiosyncracies of Cloke (for want of a better word).

With Warnock fit, Hampson continuing to develop, I would really like Kreuzer used as a KP forward - we will destroy him and his body if he keeps playing in the ruck from this early on. We had no choice this year but with a fit list, Kreuzer must be used up forward more often.

One of our bravest and most consistent players this year just looked like he'd conked out.


He was one of our best last night.


Just because he was one of our best doesn't mean that he didn't look tired.

Shows you good he is, busting his gut even when tired.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
bax wrote:
[

No spin doctoring, but seriously you'd think we should be on top of the ladder the way you carry on sometimes.

All your comments can be attributed to any team at any time of the year. Let me know your solution to our problems and I'll direct Brett Ratten end the MC to this site :thumbsup: .

Waite and Jamison were massive outs this year and anyone that thought we'd go deep into September without them had rocks in their head. I'm so pissed off we lost it's not funny but put the season in perspective and we're on the right track.

How would we have won with Waite and Jamo in the side... the game changed through the middle in the last... We went short and we got overun....thats where we lost the game...!!!

And no wwere not on the right track.. UNLESS we know how to play the game...were jusst on a track...[/quote]


" How would we have won with Waite and Jamo in the side " >>> That comment is seriously a joke isn't it?[/quote]


Ummmmmm Browns kicked bags on Waite bigger than last nights....

I think you guys are kidding yourselves...... :lol:

Black kills us.... so Brown /Bradshaw do well against us....

They kill us even with Waite and Jameson in the side......

You win anyway... if you control the game in the middle and apply the pressure .. if youre waiting on winning from the last line... good luck!!! :screwy:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
jimmae wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If we had lost the midfield and not a couple of tall defenders id agree.

If we had lost Fev and Judd id agree.


So what youre saying is Brisbane didnt have players out and our players played to the best of their abilities but wernt good enough ???

Keep it in perspective.

Brisbane had players out and players under an injury cloud...Brisbane is who we played!

We didnt get the most out of our players.
Our players didnt get the most out of themselves.
Our tactics were flawed.. as they have been all year.
Our players are not conditioned to run hard.

Im waiting for the spin doctoring....

They were missing Adcock, Drummond, Leuenberger & Charman.

We were missing Waite, Jamison, Warnock & Hadley.

Comparatively, we were missing more key players, and I would argue a couple of those players are of greater quality than their names.

No spin doctoring, just a very simple comparison.



Youre kidding right????
Drummon Adcock are play makers for them
Their ruckmen means they can play with Clarke up forward and or Bradshaw down back... or Brennan KP... or half forward.

Warnock has played 20 games of footy.


Waite has been destroyed by Brown before.. on more than one occasion...

They had players out.. so did we....

They won.... because we didnt contain and dominate their engine room when it counted....and control between the arcs..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Synbad on Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group