Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:20 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
[edit]

_________________
Go BLues


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:08 am, edited 3 times in total.
breach of 2.2 - off topic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:23 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
99prelim wrote:
RATTEN (CARLTON)=BARTLETT(RICHMOND)
favourite son who cannot coach. Would Richmond have thought in 1980 that 29 years later they were still a rabble?????????
A couple of us believe that we are becoming another Richmond. 14 years since our last flag and still years away.


You could be right...we could become another Richmond. Parts of the fanbase seem to be developing a taste for eating their own at the very least :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Belisarius wrote:
99prelim wrote:
RATTEN (CARLTON)=BARTLETT(RICHMOND)
favourite son who cannot coach. Would Richmond have thought in 1980 that 29 years later they were still a rabble?????????
A couple of us believe that we are becoming another Richmond. 14 years since our last flag and still years away.


You could be right...we could become another Richmond. Parts of the fanbase seem to be developing a taste for eating their own at the very least :grin:


\


Richomnd only ate their own after 20 years of darkness...

maybe if they had done it earlier... richmond may have been at a better place... :thumbsup:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Is it true Essendon* wont be making a decion on a 2 year extension for Knights before the end of the season?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
DownUnderChick wrote:
So have the milk bar owners.

:cool:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:55 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
Where is juddyandthekreuzers?

I reckon the traffic in this thread will slow down significantly until our next loss


Boy were you wrong... :razz:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:25 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
Where is juddyandthekreuzers?

I reckon the traffic in this thread will slow down significantly until our next loss


Boy were you wrong... :razz:


The bait worked :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Blueboy_Dan wrote:

The bait worked :smoking:


:grin:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:27 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Synbad wrote:
I dont get that argument.
Just cos Voss was in the game till very recently and Ratts hasnt been around the game in years... and neither have had a process ... it doesnt mean that there is any logic to that all.


Are you sure you aren't exaggerating...not even a bit :wink: Had Ratts really been out of the game for years?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21579
Location: North of the border
Synbad wrote:
Is it true Essendon* wont be making a decion on a 2 year extension for Knights before the end of the season?



Yes and I think they are correct - I don't disagree that they signed Ratts to an extended contract to early . But I don't believe signing him for 2 years originally was a good idea either
3 would have been better - two years you take short cuts to protect your job and conversely signing someone for 4 or 5 can cause its own problems and development can stall because they think they have plenty of time


I might be wrong but didn't the coaches association have some clause written into all contracts that they must be informed by mid year

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Is it true Essendon* wont be making a decion on a 2 year extension for Knights before the end of the season?



Yes and I think they are correct - I don't disagree that they signed Ratts to an extended contract to early . But I don't believe signing him for 2 years originally was a good idea either
3 would have been better - two years you take short cuts to protect your job and conversely signing someone for 4 or 5 can cause its own problems and development can stall because they think they have plenty of time


I might be wrong but didn't the coaches association have some clause written into all contracts that they must be informed by mid year


So we should be on the lookout for shortcuts from Knights in the last part of the season?

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21579
Location: North of the border
[edit]

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:37 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24646
Location: Kaloyasena
[edit]

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
breach of 2.2 - off topic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Is it true Essendon* wont be making a decion on a 2 year extension for Knights before the end of the season?



Yes and I think they are correct - I don't disagree that they signed Ratts to an extended contract to early . But I don't believe signing him for 2 years originally was a good idea either
3 would have been better - two years you take short cuts to protect your job and conversely signing someone for 4 or 5 can cause its own problems and development can stall because they think they have plenty of time


I might be wrong but didn't the coaches association have some clause written into all contracts that they must be informed by mid year



Who are you to think Ratts was re signed early?
Youre not Pratt or Swann .. what do you know? :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25375
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
No what I am saying is that I fail to believe that a self made billionaire would throw his money behind something on the advice of a old boys club that didn't know what they were doing.

See being critical of Sticks and Ratts you are in turn saying that a group of guys managed to con an old man out of a lot of money to feather their own nest and look after themselves

I am saying you don't become that rich being that stupid . If Pratt thinks that Sticks is the right man and put his faith in him - I would say their is a fair chance that Sticks is the right man - I have had dealings with Visy for some 15 odd years and I haven't met a person in senior management there yet that wasn't totally on top of his job

They were playing with Pratts money and reputation - I fail to be even slightly convinced that Sticks and others have the agenda you think they have and they are not as incompetent as you are suggesting


I'm with you line of argument.

No way Pratt would just say to Sticks "whatever you reckon Sticks...your choice".

Pratt would have spoken to the right people and asked the appropriate people about the coaching job and process. He would have his people asking the football world the same questions. Pratt diligence and process; the one that works without all the process.

Pratt knew the answers as to the requirements of the list (on field) and went out and got the best in the land (Judd) and nearly snagged the best big player (Pavlich)...both were out of contract and there was no way Jonathon Brown, Ablett, Chapman ....other elite players were going to leave their club, their culture to come to Carlton. IMO as far as recruiting is concerned we did very well indeed with Judd....still don't believe it.

Face it, at the time of the coaching appointment there was no options. Roos was a no, Eade was out to pasture etc etc...my fav at the time was Bond...there wasn't much else I was hooked on. I truly believed that Ratts wasn't going to be considered after holding the baby after the Pagan sacking. I was spewing to see Ratts at Melbourne, then to see what he'd done to their midfield (played out of their skins and from cellar dweller into finals).

When I heard Ratts had been selected above Bond, I was damn excited. Parkin made mention several times of the advice he received from Ratts in the 90's; he said Ratts was a born coach. He has fantastic ability to build rapport with people and has the knack of making people feel comfortable around him.

Now I wasn't happy with Ratts from rounds 3 to 8, and other than the Adelaide and Bombers game I have been pretty happy. I believe the players we shit against the Bombers not so much Ratten.

We are expected to play finals. There's 8 games to go and we're sitting 7th. It's a close field, and that's not Rattnes fault what they other teams around him are doing. Sure we could have won 3 close ones and sit 4th, but we didn't. We are heading in the right direction imo.

Bloody hell, we've been without Walker, Warnock, and now Waite and Bower, Carrazzo and Grigg for a big period. Injury plays a big part.

There's no way Pratt was badly influenced, and ther's no way Ratts has proved he is the right choice for Carlton. But then again, on the flipside, he hasn't shown he's not, with 8 rounds to go and possibly finals.

Great post SB :thumbsup:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:04 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 905
Melvey wrote:
The club needs to get rid of Ratten and get..........

Mark Williams as senior coach. Under him Buckley, Hardwick or even Dean Laidley.

Imagine..........

Mark Williams, Nathan Buckley, Damien Hardwick/Dean Laidley in charge of our boys

compared to

Brett Ratten, Mark Riley, Brent Montogomery and Craig Bradley.


[edit] Imagine if our dams were 100% full, imagine if Japan beat US to developing the A-bomb, imagine if women never suffered from PMT.... :roll: :roll:

You rattle off names as if names guarantee success. Who would've thought that Tudor would be so highly rated as assistant coach when he was assistant coach at Calder Cannons in 2003, 7 years after he retired as a player. Ditto Ken Hinkley at Geelong prior to him contributing to ultimate success at the Cats. The AFL is full of "no-name" assistants, don't throw up ours & compare to the 4 you've listed - & pretend that putting the 4 names together would = automatic success.

There are several "no-name" assistant coaches at AFL clubs right now, who have just as much chance of becoming AFL premiership coaches as Nathan Buckley or Damien Hardwick. I don't know if Brett Ratten, or Brent Montgomery is going to be one of them, but I'm prepared to given them a chance for a while yet.


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
breach of rule 2.1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:12 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
99prelim wrote:
COP OUT 101......."You don't know what's going on at the club"
COP OUT 102......."We've come from a long way back"
COP OUT 102......."Development takes time"


COP OUT 104......."The players have no personal responsibility...it's all the coach"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Belisarius wrote:
99prelim wrote:
COP OUT 101......."You don't know what's going on at the club"
COP OUT 102......."We've come from a long way back"
COP OUT 102......."Development takes time"


COP OUT 104......."The players have no personal responsibility...it's all the coach"

COP OUT 105 .... The coach has no responsibilty for the team's output..'its the players stupid'

Dunno why we need coaches... :thumbsup:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Synbad on Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24646
Location: Kaloyasena
lucablue wrote:
Imagine if our dams were 100% full, imagine if Japan beat US to developing the A-bomb, imagine if women never suffered from PMT.... :roll: :roll:

You rattle off names as if names guarantee success. Who would've thought that Tudor would be so highly rated as assistant coach when he was assistant coach at Calder Cannons in 2003, 7 years after he retired as a player. Ditto Ken Hinkley at Geelong prior to him contributing to ultimate success at the Cats. The AFL is full of "no-name" assistants, don't throw up ours & compare to the 4 you've listed - & pretend that putting the 4 names together would = automatic success.

There are several "no-name" assistant coaches at AFL clubs right now, who have just as much chance of becoming AFL premiership coaches as Nathan Buckley or Damien Hardwick. I don't know if Brett Ratten, or Brent Montgomery is going to be one of them, but I'm prepared to given them a chance for a while yet.




I like the cut of your gib lucablue. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:19 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I love the Cop Out claims - this warrants its own thread, perhaps one for each Cop Out.

I completely disagree that 'We've come from a long way back' is a cop out. In 2006 our list was appalling and easily the worst in the competition. yes we've been able to claw back from priority picks and draft access but EVERY club has a corresponding pick in each round of the draft. It's a very slow process to come back from miles back.

This is not a pro-Ratten statement, but if you think we've got a list of 44 AFL quality players you are kidding yourselves.

We've done OK but when my hero Simon Wiggins still gets games you realise that we're not yet anywhere near a top 4 list.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group