Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:22 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
camelboy wrote:
Yes, but conflicts of interest are all about perception.

I suppose you don't have a problem with the perception that Sticks is sitting in the coaches box with some of his best mates whilst being Club President? I don't, but I also did not have a problem with what Eddie said on Thursday night.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Oh in addtion to my previous post...

TruBlueBrad wrote:
Well you may as well ban anyone from the media having any involvement at club level then.

I can just imagine the outcry and claims of Eddie being gutless if he declined to comment on any issue.


It really depends on the subject matter. On the topic of Wallace being sacked, let’s imagine Eddie said, “looks fellas, everyone knows I am the president of Collingwood, therefore it’s not really fair game for me to comment on how Richmond appoints their coaching staff. I have my opinion, but its’ proably best if I keep it to myself.”

Rather than being criticised for being gutless, I expect he would have been praised for taking a responsible and understandable stance.

Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
woof wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Yes, but conflicts of interest are all about perception.

I suppose you don't have a problem with the perception that Sticks is sitting in the coaches box with some of his best mates whilst being Club President? I don't, but I also did not have a problem with what Eddie said on Thursday night.


Perception of that situation with Sticks in the Box is that the President doesn't trust his Coach!

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
woof wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Yes, but conflicts of interest are all about perception.

I suppose you don't have a problem with the perception that Sticks is sitting in the coaches box with some of his best mates whilst being Club President? I don't, but I also did not have a problem with what Eddie said on Thursday night.


Actually, I did, and have had an issue in the past with Sticks being both a board member and on the match committee. :lol:

However, on the scale of things, Sticks in the coaches box last week was a minor issue when compared to Eddie's comments.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:44 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
camelboy wrote:
Oh in addtion to my previous post...

TruBlueBrad wrote:
Well you may as well ban anyone from the media having any involvement at club level then.

I can just imagine the outcry and claims of Eddie being gutless if he declined to comment on any issue.


It really depends on the subject matter. On the topic of Wallace being sacked, let’s imagine Eddie said, “looks fellas, everyone knows I am the president of Collingwood, therefore it’s not really fair game for me to comment on how Richmond appoints their coaching staff. I have my opinion, but its’ proably best if I keep it to myself.”

Rather than being criticised for being gutless, I expect he would have been praised for taking a responsible and understandable stance.

Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


He chased a headline because apart from his Presidency of the Filth he no longer is relevant and that would be killing him.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
DownUnderChick wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Oh in addtion to my previous post...

TruBlueBrad wrote:
Well you may as well ban anyone from the media having any involvement at club level then.

I can just imagine the outcry and claims of Eddie being gutless if he declined to comment on any issue.


It really depends on the subject matter. On the topic of Wallace being sacked, let’s imagine Eddie said, “looks fellas, everyone knows I am the president of Collingwood, therefore it’s not really fair game for me to comment on how Richmond appoints their coaching staff. I have my opinion, but its’ proably best if I keep it to myself.”

Rather than being criticised for being gutless, I expect he would have been praised for taking a responsible and understandable stance.

Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


He chased a headline because apart from his Presidency of the Filth he no longer is relevant and that would be killing him.


ZING!


I would tend to agree.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:50 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
camelboy wrote:
Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


The Terry Wallace fire was created last year and it was not by Eddie, the fire is soley Terry's doing and nobody elses. The Richmond players performance on Thursday just made it hotter and that was the only thing they produced that was close to hot. Eddie just said what most people were thinking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
camelboy wrote:
However, on the scale of things, Sticks in the coaches box last week was a minor issue when compared to Eddie's comments.


If we got flogged by 83 points the perception of Sticks sitting in the box with his mate might not have been such a minor issue. Just like Eddie opening his mouth, there is an opportunity for some journo to make it an issue at the right time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
woof wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


The Terry Wallace fire was created last year and it was not by Eddie, the fire is soley Terry's doing and nobody elses. The Richmond players performance on Thursday just made it hotter and that was the only thing they produced that was close to hot. Eddie just said what most people were thinking.


You're probably right. I just think Eddie was the wrong person to say it, that's all. :thumbsup:

To be honest, I'm not all that fussed by it, because I stopped taking Eddie seriously years ago, but I can't understand why the pro-Eddie crowd cannot understand the reasons why his comments have attracted the criticism they have.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20247
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
camelboy wrote:
On the topic of Wallace being sacked, let’s imagine Eddie said, “looks fellas, everyone knows I am the president of Collingwood, therefore it’s not really fair game for me to comment on how Richmond appoints their coaching staff. I have my opinion, but its’ proably best if I keep it to myself.”


"and at the end of the day, we're all mates"

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:04 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
camelboy wrote:
woof wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


The Terry Wallace fire was created last year and it was not by Eddie, the fire is soley Terry's doing and nobody elses. The Richmond players performance on Thursday just made it hotter and that was the only thing they produced that was close to hot. Eddie just said what most people were thinking.


You're probably right. I just think Eddie was the wrong person to say it, that's all. :thumbsup:

To be honest, I'm not all that fussed by it, because I stopped taking Eddie seriously years ago, but I can't understand why the pro-Eddie crowd cannot understand the reasons why his comments have attracted the criticism they have.


As a President of a Football club he knows full bloody well that a comment like he made would destablise the club and bring unwanted attention to said club and him and at the end of the day if it brings attention to Eddie, then that's all that matters.

He did miss out on 5 Gold Logies after all. Now it's time to get back into the limelight.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
camelboy wrote:
woof wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


The Terry Wallace fire was created last year and it was not by Eddie, the fire is soley Terry's doing and nobody elses. The Richmond players performance on Thursday just made it hotter and that was the only thing they produced that was close to hot. Eddie just said what most people were thinking.


You're probably right. I just think Eddie was the wrong person to say it, that's all. :thumbsup:

To be honest, I'm not all that fussed by it, because I stopped taking Eddie seriously years ago, but I can't understand why the pro-Eddie crowd cannot understand the reasons why his comments have attracted the criticism they have.


+1

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
camelboy wrote:
Oh in addtion to my previous post...

TruBlueBrad wrote:
Well you may as well ban anyone from the media having any involvement at club level then.

I can just imagine the outcry and claims of Eddie being gutless if he declined to comment on any issue.


It really depends on the subject matter. On the topic of Wallace being sacked, let’s imagine Eddie said, “looks fellas, everyone knows I am the president of Collingwood, therefore it’s not really fair game for me to comment on how Richmond appoints their coaching staff. I have my opinion, but its’ proably best if I keep it to myself.”

Rather than being criticised for being gutless, I expect he would have been praised for taking a responsible and understandable stance.

Instead, he chased the headlines by creating a fire that didn’t need any input from him. His comments were totally inappropriate.


I really can't see Eddies detractors praising him for anything. Thats where perception really comes into it.

Your other points do make sense. Even when he's commentating and acting as an employee of SEN, the perception is that he's still Collingwood President....even though that isn't his role.

The fault in that case, however, lies with those that are unable to split his roles in their own mind :razz:

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The fault in that case, however, lies with those that are unable to split his roles in their own mind :razz:


That happens mostly because Eddie himself made a conscious effort to fuse the two. he used that to his advantage when it suited him, now that it's the overwhelming public perception, he can't complain that it's not fair to him to be perceived as such.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
*post removed*

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I really can't see Eddies detractors praising him for anything. Thats where perception really comes into it.


Living outside of the football saturation central that is known as Melbourne, the only actual criticism I have seen is a bit on Offisders on ABC TV on Sunday morning and (IIRC) they touched on it briefly on Monday’s episode of On the couch. Caro, on Offsiders, was the most criticial of Eddie, and I do think she would have praised Eddie if he chose not to comment. Apart from that, though, you’re probably right. That’s not perception, however, that’s just sheer bloody mindedness. Something else Eddie knows a bit about, haha.

TruBlueBrad wrote:
Your other points do make sense. Even when he's commentating and acting as an employee of SEN, the perception is that he's still Collingwood President....even though that isn't his role.

The fault in that case, however, lies with those that are unable to split his roles in their own mind :razz:


He is working for SEN remember. :thumbsup:

Ordinarily, I would agree with you, but Eddie seems to go to extraordinary lenghts to put his club first (which in itself is an admirable trait), that he has to expect to always be seen as Collingwood Pres, regardless of the role he takes. That won’t change until either he or the club works out that they are now probably better off without him.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..ok, here's a few of my non-sensical thoughts on alla dis..

.. ..firstly, even when bein' a media man Eddie is always club Pres.. ..there's nothing wrong with a club pres making comments (Kennet does it now, elliot and gutnick used to in the past).. ..the only shame about Eddie is his backtracking.. ..say what he wants, and stick by it.. ..no weasling out of it.. ..no matter what he does/says, will always reflect back on him as club pres.. ..if he comments on other clubs, he can expect some counter-comment.. ..again, nothing wrong with it.. ..i like a bit of spice in the media box..

..as for Sticks in the coach box, we all understand he's a front for Pratt, the 'power behind the throne'.. ..and most of us are happy with that yeah..?..

..the only real conflict of intrest i've ever been filthy about was collins and our tesltra dome shafting..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
So how about Ratts and that new show ey?

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MPH78, Scotty12000 and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group