Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 11:36 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:41 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Shakin77 wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
See I'll ask again - someone answer.

Are you happy with the defensive side of Stevo's game, his eeforts in chasing for example, his 1% when they have the ball, contesting a mark for example? Hell no - needs to do more. being a good disposer if the ball, doesn't cut it anymore. If Judd can get his own ball, then so can Stevens.

if no, how would you try and improve it (I'll give you my answer I think he can get better and so I was wondering in the train how, and so I chose the most radical to see what people might come up with - again, I have said numerous times I think he is a good player - really that's my point, how can we make him better?) Stick him on the most attacking player in the Doggies team and tell him to nullify him. Is his lack of accountability costs us the game, then drop him to the Ants until he learns. The days of Stevo being our playmaker are passing a rate of knots, he can't hide under that bushell anymore.

or do you just accept it? No Is that good enough? No

or will he be replaced by the time we are ready to seriously challenge? If he doesn't change his style of play, yes he will be. He needs to speak to Josh Francou or maybe we should get Josh Francou to the club.


See this is where the argument losses all validity for me.

Believe it or not AFL footballers play different roles based on their skills and attributes and we have inside and outside players. I have no doubt in my mind that Stevens is playing a role and if you want him to win more ball (Rank 3rd behind Judd and Bentick only) then I suggest you vent your anger at Brett Ratten and the MC.

The MC clearly wants Stevens to be one of the final links of the chain and the reasons for this are obvious to all. I would love Bentick to bang goals 55 on the run but his skills lay elsewhere.

The lack of accountability for midfielders only applies to the whipping boys like Stevens. Blokes like Judd, Kerr and Ablett wouldn’t give a flying who their direct opponents is because most of the time it’s the bloke holding onto their jumper. And how much defensive effort do you think they would put into Luke Ablett, Ryan Crowley or Andrew Welsh? Judd is not accountable at all and nor should he be. His job is offensive and to win the ball not to worry about some pleb like Luke Ablett. Like Stevens he chases and tackles when we don’t have the ball (Stevens 3rd in tackles again behind Judd and Bentick).

When Judd was injured against the Bombers Stevens takes his role in the engine room and gets 10 contested possessions for the game. He can play that role when required.

May only concern with Stevens is that when he is beaten like he was against Dempster and Ablett the MC don’t seems to have a way on getting him into the game. Playing back pocket on Jared Moore is not it. He played a great game on a half forward flank after getting touched up by Peverill last season in our great come from behind victory against the Bombers. Maybe even a half back flank for deeper forward to provide support to Betts.


some good points and the question is how many unaccountable midfielders can we have? (and it is not just tackles, in fact of all my criticisms of stevo that's probably the least - they are all small relatively but I'm just wondering)

I agree Judd doesn't - though I wonder how much of that is also that his zip has yet to return - next year will tell us more.

More importantly - can we have players with vastly different skills sets in all sorts of areas of the game? If this now our weakness (ignoring rucks/chf and skill with the ball?)

Do we need to even up, not just the bottom 6 as some are harping on about - which I think will happen anyway both through development and through the drafts.

I'm wondering how to even up the players I think will be there come finals time. I'm was wondering if we could get a more even spread - if this might make us a better/stronger team. And so I started with stevo probably because that chase in the last really pissed me off.

See I think stevo is one of our better weapons but his weaknesses (like Judd's I agree) can be used against us. Can we improve this area - or do we accept it?

Do we think when the rest of the team gets better his weakness will be okay?

Can stevo be better than he is - if so, how to go about it? I guess also I'm thinking about addressing it this year - not next year - maybe the coaching staff will address it over summer?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:47 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
budzy wrote:
...At the start of the season you stated that you were privately in contact re the TC rumours about a re-occurring neck injury and vigorously defended any criticism of him...


Ah, I see. That wasn't with Stevo directly, but a source within the club, that is fair to say, should be trusted. :P

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
budzy wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Same thing is happening with Fisher.

Sure, both guys have room for improvement after last week's game, but they're not alone there..


No need to drag another player into this discussion to back your argument. Stevo is V/C, a level of responsibility above most others.


Fair enough. If I had my way Stevens wouldn't be VC. But I acknowledge my view is formed from very much an outsider's perspective and what he is like around the club with the other players I cannot say. But, that our options for captain were Stevens and Judd says a lot for our lack of options really. Don't get me wrong, Judd is fantastic and was really the only bona fide option IMO. However, if Judd had already been here for a year and we were only looking for a new VC, then I reckon we would have chosen Murphy or Gibbs.

With any luck, that will happen next year anyway. ;)

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
Goodes got well and truly towelled up for most of the game by Gibbs . I wonder if swans supportwes think he should be dropped ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
gee now there's an argument - so hey, why not go read the swannies site and see :garthp:

Goodes chases and tackles, smothers, competes adequately in the air, is flexible and versatile and if he didn't show commitment in all aspects of the game I am sure the match committee and the leadership group would do something about it.

But not us.

We accept the weaknesses and just go 'ooh look silky skills'

hopefully the players playing against us in finals soon do the same. 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:34 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
dannyboy wrote:
We accept the weaknesses and just go 'ooh look silky skills'


*shudders*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
camelboy wrote:
budzy wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Same thing is happening with Fisher.

Sure, both guys have room for improvement after last week's game, but they're not alone there..


No need to drag another player into this discussion to back your argument. Stevo is V/C, a level of responsibility above most others.


Fair enough. If I had my way Stevens wouldn't be VC. But I acknowledge my view is formed from very much an outsider's perspective and what he is like around the club with the other players I cannot say. But, that our options for captain were Stevens and Judd says a lot for our lack of options really. Don't get me wrong, Judd is fantastic and was really the only bona fide option IMO. However, if Judd had already been here for a year and we were only looking for a new VC, then I reckon we would have chosen Murphy or Gibbs.

With any luck, that will happen next year anyway. ;)



SIMMO

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Shakin77 wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
See I'll ask again - someone answer.

Are you happy with the defensive side of Stevo's game, his eeforts in chasing for example, his 1% when they have the ball, contesting a mark for example? Hell no - needs to do more. being a good disposer if the ball, doesn't cut it anymore. If Judd can get his own ball, then so can Stevens.

if no, how would you try and improve it (I'll give you my answer I think he can get better and so I was wondering in the train how, and so I chose the most radical to see what people might come up with - again, I have said numerous times I think he is a good player - really that's my point, how can we make him better?) Stick him on the most attacking player in the Doggies team and tell him to nullify him. Is his lack of accountability costs us the game, then drop him to the Ants until he learns. The days of Stevo being our playmaker are passing a rate of knots, he can't hide under that bushell anymore.

or do you just accept it? No Is that good enough? No

or will he be replaced by the time we are ready to seriously challenge? If he doesn't change his style of play, yes he will be. He needs to speak to Josh Francou or maybe we should get Josh Francou to the club.


See this is where the argument losses all validity for me.

Believe it or not AFL footballers play different roles based on their skills and attributes and we have inside and outside players. I have no doubt in my mind that Stevens is playing a role and if you want him to win more ball (Rank 3rd behind Judd and Bentick only) then I suggest you vent your anger at Brett Ratten and the MC.


Exactly what I was trying to say about a half dozen posts beforehand... he was given a role and was deemed successful.

So, those who want Stevens dropped - whether you like it or not - he won't be, because he is doing the task given to him by Ratts...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
damn, there goes by vendetta against stevo...

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Hey BH, threads like this make me reminisce about the 2006 trade period. :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:38 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6431
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
keogh wrote:
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


:-D Hmmmmmm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:08 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
keogh wrote:
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


There might have been a few slackers in the Geelong team of a few years ago that are still very much on the list - S Johnson, C Mooney.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
DownUnderChick wrote:
keogh wrote:
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


There might have been a few slackers in the Geelong team of a few years ago that are still very much on the list - S Johnson, C Mooney.


I agree DUC and what turned those two around was a strong club imposing penalties and restrictions that made them realise do it the teams way or get out. I am not sure we have reached that level of internal discipline just yet.

It is an area I think Ratten has to improve on in year 2. At the moment he is trying to be everybody's friend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:15 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
cj, no pressure to divulge, but can you gives us some insight into what you were doing on Sunday with the club?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
DownUnderChick wrote:
cj, no pressure to divulge, but can you gives us some insight into what you were doing on Sunday with the club?


Only a very privledged guest of someone (Sponsor). Nothing official. I get about one or two offers every year because of work to go to rooms etc of different clubs.

Being Carlton I was very excited. Get an interesting insight into how each club is going off field and I find it interesting to see some players up close and personal. Had some very interesting conversations regarding some U18 kids and some kids at other clubs.

My observations did change my opinions on some things.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:37 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
DownUnderChick wrote:
keogh wrote:
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


There might have been a few slackers in the Geelong team of a few years ago that are still very much on the list - S Johnson, C Mooney.


:wink:

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
the trady bunch :lol:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
cj69 wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
keogh wrote:
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


There might have been a few slackers in the Geelong team of a few years ago that are still very much on the list - S Johnson, C Mooney.


I agree DUC and what turned those two around was a strong club imposing penalties and restrictions that made them realise do it the teams way or get out. I am not sure we have reached that level of internal discipline just yet.

It is an area I think Ratten has to improve on in year 2. At the moment he is trying to be everybody's friend.


which is why the question 8) I think its important we set out what we want and then develop the ways of achieving that. I do not want to waste the talent we have.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:44 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
grrofunger wrote:
the trady bunch :lol:



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, chief, diesel_85 and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group