Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 11:58 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:46 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 6:10 pm
Posts: 87
CON:

Fev's body language early in games seems to set up how he is going to play the rest of the game. Yes he is double teamed but other quality forwards deal with it differently.....dont think he earnt much of a pay packet today!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 424
KoRn wrote:
Con:

Every single team from now on will double team Fevola. Shut him down and we will lose.


No - shut our midfield down and we will lose. If our midfield has time and space, Fev will kick goals. Our midfield were under pressure all day and Adelaide are masters at that.

Anyway Pros:

- We were in it for most of the game despite giving away a lot of experience and size.
- Eddie, Browne, Murph, Russell all pretty good

Cons:

- Smashed in the ruck. 55 hitouts to 18, and I saw a stat in the last quarter which said 18 hit outs to advantage to 1. My kingdom for a 202+cm ruckman who can at least nullify the contest. Hammer step on down?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
PROS:
- Browne: Very good debut
- Kreuzer: Continues to come on
- Stevens/Simpson: Looked to be the only midfielders that actually ran the lines today
- Eddie: Great 1st quarter, shame about the rest of the game

CONS:
- Fev: Everything to do with him was bad today. His kicking was poor, as was the kicking to him.
- The fact that despite the Crows clearly telling the world what their gameplan was going to be, we still played into their hands
- Judd: Absolutely killed by Shirley today
- Lack of midfield depth
- Getting smashed in the ruck against one of the weakest combinations going around today
- Lack of pressure. How many times were crows players able to play ring-a-rosy with the ball without anyone laying a finger on them?
- Kicking for goal: Grigg, Russell, Fev
- Fisher: Couldn't lay a hand on it today
- Hartlett/Thornton injuries: Really hurt us badly. As usual it seems to be the players more important to our structure that go down. If Hartlett's injury is serious, I think it could be curtains
- Jordan Russell: I can't believe all the praise he's receiving here today, I thought he was terrible, and that SURELY he would be dropped after today. Oooh, he laid a couple of tackles and took a few marks, whoopee-doo!
- Last quarter umpiring: As the Carlton-hating media are quick to point out, the shit umpiring probably had no effect on the result. But still, it certainly snuffed out any chance we might've had to get back in it.

Far more cons than I'd like today.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19531
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Pros:
Browne
Russell - He is getting better each week
Kreuzer's football smarts

Cons:
Hartlett's hamstrings :cry:
Forward structure once he went down - Adelaide players knew it would be kicked to Fev more often than not. Fev stays mainly inside 50 and we had no one working outside the 50. No option leading up meant we bombed it or kicked it to Fev with Bassett/Stevens/Bock zoning off in front of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:56 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Donstuie wrote:
- Judd: Absolutely killed by Shirley today

Rubbish.

He was pure class at times.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:57 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Tend to agree with Donstuie about JR.....he attacked the footy well but his errors kicking for goal, getting caught with the footy really hurt us.....at this stage of his career he should not be making basic errors.
I'd like to see Ryan Jackson get some senior game time.....similar player to JR but better disposal IMHO...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Last edited by Elwood Blues1 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
budzy wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
- Judd: Absolutely killed by Shirley today

Rubbish.

He was pure class at times.

He had only 10 touches to 3 qtr time, and was only able to actually show flair when he could finally break Shirley's tag. When it was 50/50, the great man was soundly beaten.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:00 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Pros: Browne
Cons: Stupid skill errors, so typical.
We have a long way to go


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Didn't hear a lot of the match, but here's mine.

Pro:
Ran a good team in Adelaide very close for most of the match even with Fev playing like a pork chop.
More will be learnt from a loss like this against a team like Adelaide than a smashing
Dare I say it, an "honourable win". Almost.

Con:
Fev played like a pork chop.
Poor decision making
Execrable skills cost us goals against when we were up and in control, and ended up costing us the match momentum and probably the match.
Not a whole lot of depth it would appear.


I reckon you're a bit harsh on Fev. He didn't have a good day, but "pork chop" is OTT. He was stiff not to be given a couple of frees for over the shoulder and chopping the arms. I didn't think he sulked or gave up, I just thought he struggled to get into the game against a top-line defence and he received little in terms of support up forward. The ball wasn't coming in there all that well either, as we got smashed in the midfield.

PROS:
Fev & Judd were quiet, and we still stretched a very professional top 8 team.
We received a lesson on pressure football and being clean with the ball.
Simmo.
Carrots.
Bower.
Jamo's 2nd half.
Eddie's 1st half.
Browne did a few good things.
JR got involved and made a reasonable contribution.

CONS:
Last quarters remain a problem.
Still too many tackles not sticking.
Injuries to Harts, T-Bird & maybe Browne.
Pfieffer report.
Fisher needs to lift.
We got slaughtered in the ruck and in the midfield.
Impatient supporters who don't understand how long it takes to build a successful team.

Overall, I thought it was a good learning game for us. I thought it showed how far we have come....and how far there still is to go.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:00 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
Tend to agree with Donstuie about JR.....he attacked the footy well but his errors kicking for goal, getting caught with the footy really hurt us.....at this stage of his career he should not be making basic errors.
I'd like to see Ryan Jackson get some senior game time.....similar player to JR but better disposal IMHO...

Jacksons disposal aint to flash I reckon Elwood. JR had some howlers today but so did a few others...

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:04 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 6:10 pm
Posts: 87
CONS;

-Interesting that inside their 50 we always had runners front and centre of contests and did well at clearing the ball due to this. Inside our 50 after each ball came to ground at best we had 1 against 3 or 4. They cleared the ball way too easily from our 50. Adelaide are guns at doing this generally. I'd love to see more crumbers front and centre in forward line contests.
-Murphs skill errors!! Great player wasting a lot of ball

PROS;

Imrovement of Russell


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:06 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Donstuie wrote:
budzy wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
- Judd: Absolutely killed by Shirley today

Rubbish.

He was pure class at times.

He had only 10 touches to 3 qtr time, and was only able to actually show flair when he could finally break Shirley's tag. When it was 50/50, the great man was soundly beaten.

He wasn't "absolutely killed"

He wasn't "soundly beaten"

He may've been "slightly nullified" :wink:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Effes wrote:
Cons:
Hartlett's hamstrings :cry:
Forward structure once he went down - Adelaide players knew it would be kicked to Fev more often than not. Fev stays mainly inside 50 and we had no one working outside the 50. No option leading up meant we bombed it or kicked it to Fev with Bassett/Stevens/Bock zoning off in front of him.


That's why I was disappointed with Fisher's game. He gave us very little up forward (even though Bassett is a tough opponent). I thought Ratts might have even thrown him into defence in the last quarter (when Waite went forward), just to mix things up.

Injuries to other players might keep the pressure off Fisher to hold his spot in the team, but we really need him to lift.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
budzy wrote:
Con's

Nick Stevens. Should play as a forward option only.



Please explain?

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
People forget we played a decent team possible top 4 and took it up to them.

They chokes us up and it was a real test to see where we are at. Could have been much worse, silly turnovers cost but you get with a young team.

Considering Juddy was shut down and so to Fev we actually managed to win a bit of the ball but lacked options other than Fev up forward.

The Carlton of old would have gone down by 10 goals today. We gave em a few cheap ones and so did Ray Chamberline.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
budzy wrote:

Ray Chamberlains free against Waite. He called it for time wasting apparently. What's the flower bag of balls behind the goals for you flower Chamberlain. Worst free kick I have ever seen!


CON:

The bottle thrown from the Carlton cheer squad missed his head


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1364
PROS:

Our first quarter. Think we got it inside 50 on 14 occasions and had 12 shots at goal.
Hartlett showed promise until he got hurt ... proved to be a viable option.
Browne ... composed ... footy smart
Bower ... not afraid to play in front ... he takes the contest on

CONS:
Hartlett getting injured ... he can't be cursed can he ?
We turn the ball over in the worst possible places and we pay for it on the scoreboard
Got smashed in the ruck duels
Russell ... worst sin in football is to have your kick touched by a player on the mark ... you can push back to the yarra river if you want to ... demonstrates lack of footy smarts
Inability to provide a quick counter attack after the opposition score a behind ... Adelaide got two goals this way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19531
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
aboynamedsue wrote:
Effes wrote:
Cons:
Hartlett's hamstrings :cry:
Forward structure once he went down - Adelaide players knew it would be kicked to Fev more often than not. Fev stays mainly inside 50 and we had no one working outside the 50. No option leading up meant we bombed it or kicked it to Fev with Bassett/Stevens/Bock zoning off in front of him.


That's why I was disappointed with Fisher's game. He gave us very little up forward (even though Bassett is a tough opponent). I thought Ratts might have even thrown him into defence in the last quarter (when Waite went forward), just to mix things up.

Injuries to other players might keep the pressure off Fisher to hold his spot in the team, but we really need him to lift.


I think Fisher will only ever be a good third tall. We needed him to present up to the wings once Hartlett went down but he doesn't seem good enough at that role. Instead he is better floating back towards goal and losing his opponent.

When exactly did Hartlett do his hammy? We looked so much better with him there; he spread Adelaide's defence and meant we didn't have to rely as much on chipping the ball around at HF.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:12 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 580
Just got back from the game.

Cons

Thought Russell was ordinary again tbh, his kick into the man changed the momentum of the game-unforgivable really, I mean he took a long enough runup. He has all the atributes to succeed except up top-and that was confirmed to me by a carlton person in the know.

Shite umpiring

Thrashed out of the centre

3 goals in second half due to no forward structure

too much fiddling with the ball in the back half but that will get better with experience.

Pros

Browne

Eddy

Jarrod Waite was good all day-that umpire stuffed up big time.

first quarter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4951
Pros
- We stretched a top six side with both Fev and Judd down.
- Nice debut from Browne
- JR improving
- Bower growing in confidence and will be a good player.
- More game time into Jamison, Grigg, Gibbs and Kruezer.

Cons
- injuries to Thornton and Hartlett
- too many skill errors
- killed in the ruck/stoppages. We badly missed Hadley IMO.
- we badly need a tall forward option, especially with Hartlett's future in doubt.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group