Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:08 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Humpers
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:44 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4941
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.

_________________
There is no footy god
Top
 Profile  
 
spartak
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:53 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:43 pm
Posts: 120
has this actually been confirmed by the club? is this 100%? are we sure he will miss? no quotes in the article
Top
 Profile  
 
4everBlue
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 442
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:

_________________
Cleanliness is next to Juddliness!
Top
 Profile  
 
TheSwan
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:37 pm
Posts: 1932
4everBlue wrote:
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:


If we didnt have so many injuries to our Rucks most people would argue that King would take the place of a youngster who is the future of the club.
Top
 Profile  
 
Donstuie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
4everBlue wrote:
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:

I was of the same opinion. But there can be little doubt that the saints did something very dodgy to secure him for so little.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY
Top
 Profile  
 
Punter22
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Donstuie wrote:
4everBlue wrote:
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:

I was of the same opinion. But there can be little doubt that the saints did something very dodgy to secure him for so little.


I thought it was more to do with Geelong needing to dump some salary off its cap number. They were able to get rid of King , Playfair and Gardiner for nothing because of the change in rule which removed the requirement for clubs to use draft picks received for players traded.
Top
 Profile  
 
Cyclonus
 Post subject: ...
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 6:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:03 am
Posts: 493
Location: 57 Mt. Pleasant St
I don't like this! Our #1 pick is suddenly injured and the info is scant.

Is it confirmed?

Did anyone see it?

Was the Brown hit more serious than first thought?

Any info would be great!

_________________
"The Wigg's big in 08!" - Chris Judd
Top
 Profile  
 
Geno
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:26 am
Posts: 46
Location: Brussels, Belgium. NO FOOTY HERE
Bad news, but Clokey is good to go. Whatever we do we must not play Ackland, otherwise we may as well go and get Micky Martyn out of retirement as well and make a complete mockery of the club.

_________________
Stop your racism against the wogs!
Top
 Profile  
 
MonkeyWashDonkeyRinse
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:42 pm
Posts: 56
Punter22 wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
4everBlue wrote:
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:

I was of the same opinion. But there can be little doubt that the saints did something very dodgy to secure him for so little.


I thought it was more to do with Geelong needing to dump some salary off its cap number. They were able to get rid of King , Playfair and Gardiner for nothing because of the change in rule which removed the requirement for clubs to use draft picks received for players traded.



we were keen on King..........Swan had a chat to his mate Balme. Balme suggested we steer clear of King as Geelong were of the opinion that King would not see out a full season due to his chronic injuries. Balme suggested that King was nursed through the VFL last season for which Geelong could afford. But, if we were looking for someone to ruck in 22 games at AFL level - King was not our man.

He will suit the Saints because they can nurse him through the season with Kosi, Rix and Gardiner.
Top
 Profile  
 
Synbad
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
MonkeyWashDonkeyRinse wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
4everBlue wrote:
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:

I was of the same opinion. But there can be little doubt that the saints did something very dodgy to secure him for so little.


I thought it was more to do with Geelong needing to dump some salary off its cap number. They were able to get rid of King , Playfair and Gardiner for nothing because of the change in rule which removed the requirement for clubs to use draft picks received for playe


rs traded.



we were keen on King..........Swan had a chat to his mate Balme. Balme suggested we steer clear of King as Geelong were of the opinion that King would not see out a full season due to his chronic injuries. Balme suggested that King was nursed through the VFL last season for which Geelong could afford. But, if we were looking for someone to ruck in 22 games at AFL level - King was not our man.

He will suit the Saints because they can nurse him through the season with Kosi, Rix and Gardiner.


There is a lot of nursing in that lot....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Top
 Profile  
 
4everBlue
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:38 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 442
Synbad wrote:
MonkeyWashDonkeyRinse wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
4everBlue wrote:
Humpers wrote:
I can't believe that the Aints picked up Steven King with pick #90 or something.

He would be ideal for us this year as it would take the pressure off Hampson/Kreuzer and give us a viable back up option in the case of injury.


I got caned for raising that possibility last trade week! :lol:

I was of the same opinion. But there can be little doubt that the saints did something very dodgy to secure him for so little.


I thought it was more to do with Geelong needing to dump some salary off its cap number. They were able to get rid of King , Playfair and Gardiner for nothing because of the change in rule which removed the requirement for clubs to use draft picks received for playe


rs traded.



we were keen on King..........Swan had a chat to his mate Balme. Balme suggested we steer clear of King as Geelong were of the opinion that King would not see out a full season due to his chronic injuries. Balme suggested that King was nursed through the VFL last season for which Geelong could afford. But, if we were looking for someone to ruck in 22 games at AFL level - King was not our man.

He will suit the Saints because they can nurse him through the season with Kosi, Rix and Gardiner.


There is a lot of nursing in that lot....


Good that we missed out then. :shock:
I hope they have plenty of RN's at the Aints - they'll be needing 'em!

_________________
Cleanliness is next to Juddliness!
Top
 Profile  
 
Cyclonus
 Post subject: ...
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:54 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:03 am
Posts: 493
Location: 57 Mt. Pleasant St
*bump!*

Anyone know anything yet?

_________________
"The Wigg's big in 08!" - Chris Judd
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], keogh, Yarsii and 52 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group