Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 3:44 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 233 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
jim wrote:
From what I read in "The Age" a while ago one of the Icke's jobs was to groom a new young coach. The artilce went further to say that the club considered Mitchell "long-term"at the club , given the excellent job he'd done, and Pagan "short-term" so Mitchell was never going to get sacked. I also read the "dispute" was from one side. Mitchell was willing to talk to Pagan but Pagan refused to talk to Mitchell. If Denis doesn't want to talk then pay him out and p!ss him off. He's been terrible here anyway. The sh!t list excuse is now gone. That excuse pretty well went last year, which made 3 wins very disappointing. Lucky for Denis we had no money at the time.

Mark Robinson mentioned on SEN last week that there were still underlying tensions at the club and was "worried" that our recent performances and positives news was simply just painting over the cracks. Interesting to see if he is right.

IIRC Jim, 2 of the interviewers were Malouf and Sticks. One's gone and the other's influence is questionable. Sticks may well become as influential in Carlton decision-making as Halle Berry was at Revlon (?) when she was the face of that company. He's a great frontman, though, and I hope he stays from that point of view.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:08 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Indie wrote:
jim wrote:
From what I read in "The Age" a while ago one of the Icke's jobs was to groom a new young coach. The artilce went further to say that the club considered Mitchell "long-term"at the club , given the excellent job he'd done, and Pagan "short-term" so Mitchell was never going to get sacked. I also read the "dispute" was from one side. Mitchell was willing to talk to Pagan but Pagan refused to talk to Mitchell. If Denis doesn't want to talk then pay him out and p!ss him off. He's been terrible here anyway. The sh!t list excuse is now gone. That excuse pretty well went last year, which made 3 wins very disappointing. Lucky for Denis we had no money at the time.

Mark Robinson mentioned on SEN last week that there were still underlying tensions at the club and was "worried" that our recent performances and positives news was simply just painting over the cracks. Interesting to see if he is right.


.IIRC Jim, 2 of the interviewers were Malouf and Sticks. One's gone and the other's influence is questionable. Sticks may well become as influential in Carlton decision-making as Halle Berry was at Revlon (?) when she was the face of that company. He's a great frontman, though, and I hope he stays from that point of view.


It was an artlicle written at the time Icke came to the club (think it may have been about Icke actually IIRC) and included most of my first paragraph. It's a few weeks ago now so I was trying to go off memory. Hopefully my memory is holding up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:10 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Steve_C7 wrote:
This whole saga is like a messy divorce, and the players are the kids stuck in the middle of it. We will not win to many games this year if there id no unity in the coaching ranks especially when we are short of on field leaders who would fill the role of big brothers for the younger kids in the club. The problem is that the time to sack Pagan is after round 12 not now, no prospective coach would apply for the job so early in the season and they would like to see some stability in the board before accepting a job with us.
Theoretically, if they did they's probably give the job to Ratten for the year before going through a formal process.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
jim wrote:
Indie wrote:
jim wrote:
From what I read in "The Age" a while ago one of the Icke's jobs was to groom a new young coach. The artilce went further to say that the club considered Mitchell "long-term"at the club , given the excellent job he'd done, and Pagan "short-term" so Mitchell was never going to get sacked. I also read the "dispute" was from one side. Mitchell was willing to talk to Pagan but Pagan refused to talk to Mitchell. If Denis doesn't want to talk then pay him out and p!ss him off. He's been terrible here anyway. The sh!t list excuse is now gone. That excuse pretty well went last year, which made 3 wins very disappointing. Lucky for Denis we had no money at the time.

Mark Robinson mentioned on SEN last week that there were still underlying tensions at the club and was "worried" that our recent performances and positives news was simply just painting over the cracks. Interesting to see if he is right.


.IIRC Jim, 2 of the interviewers were Malouf and Sticks. One's gone and the other's influence is questionable. Sticks may well become as influential in Carlton decision-making as Halle Berry was at Revlon (?) when she was the face of that company. He's a great frontman, though, and I hope he stays from that point of view.


It was an artlicle written at the time Icke came to the club (think it may have been about Icke actually IIRC) and included most of my first paragraph. It's a few weeks ago now so I was trying to go off memory. Hopefully my memory is holding up.

You're referring to an article by Carolyn Wilson which said in part:
Quote:
FREMANTLE football manager Steven Icke looks certain to be appointed to the football operations position at Carlton following the withdrawal of a number of candidates reluctant to deal with the dysfunctional relationship between Denis Pagan and Barry Mitchell.

And the AFL jobs merry-go-round has continued to revolve, with Peter Schwab — another frontrunner for the Blues' position — set to resign as chairman of the AFL's match review panel to take the top job at AFL Victoria.

The Age believes that Icke, 50, the former Kangaroos and Melbourne defender, along with Schwab and former Richmond coach Danny Frawley, were the last three in the running for the Carlton position, an expanded role following Grant Williams' departure earlier this year.

That trio, along with several others approached, all voiced concerns about the seemingly unworkable relationship between Pagan and Northern Bullants coach Mitchell, who applied unsuccessfully for the senior coaching position last September and barely has spoken to Pagan since.

Banished to the other side of Princes Park, Mitchell is continuing to develop the Blues' younger players in an operation virtually everyone in football regards as untenable. Carlton's refusal to rectify the situation has given the impression that it does not regard Pagan as anything but a short-term prospect, a fact not lost during this current interviewing process.


Quote:
Candidates were also given the impression that Pagan was no certainty to survive beyond the 2007 season, although his contract runs until the end of 2008. The contenders were told that part of the position could be to nurture and mentor a younger senior coach as well as keep the club's promising young list together.

Another report the previous day stated that Sticks and Malouf were the interviewers.

I don't believe there was anything about Mitchell in the article (which doesn't seem to be on the net now). The common belief at the time of the article was that the younger coach being referred to was Ratten. But given the history, maybe it was Mitchell.

My point is that Malouf is gone now and Sticks' influence appears to be waning. Were they pushing their own barrow from the Smorgon days or did they have the backing of Pratt? For all we know, Pratt carpeted them when he read the article. Has power transferred to Swann and Icke? If so, what are their views? Interesting questions and I suppose we'll see as the season unfolds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:55 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:53 am
Posts: 53
Location: HEADQUARTERS-CANBERRA
For what it is worth, I heard that by the end of the week there will be a closure to the Barry Mitchell - Dennis Pagan saga. The source said that that either Mitchell or Pagan will be gone. I say the former will get his marching orders rather than the latter. The source seem to say that even Pagan could be shown the door. I find that hard to believe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:10 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Indie wrote:
jim wrote:
Indie wrote:
jim wrote:
From what I read in "The Age" a while ago one of the Icke's jobs was to groom a new young coach. The artilce went further to say that the club considered Mitchell "long-term"at the club , given the excellent job he'd done, and Pagan "short-term" so Mitchell was never going to get sacked. I also read the "dispute" was from one side. Mitchell was willing to talk to Pagan but Pagan refused to talk to Mitchell. If Denis doesn't want to talk then pay him out and p!ss him off. He's been terrible here anyway. The sh!t list excuse is now gone. That excuse pretty well went last year, which made 3 wins very disappointing. Lucky for Denis we had no money at the time.

Mark Robinson mentioned on SEN last week that there were still underlying tensions at the club and was "worried" that our recent performances and positives news was simply just painting over the cracks. Interesting to see if he is right.


.IIRC Jim, 2 of the interviewers were Malouf and Sticks. One's gone and the other's influence is questionable. Sticks may well become as influential in Carlton decision-making as Halle Berry was at Revlon (?) when she was the face of that company. He's a great frontman, though, and I hope he stays from that point of view.


It was an artlicle written at the time Icke came to the club (think it may have been about Icke actually IIRC) and included most of my first paragraph. It's a few weeks ago now so I was trying to go off memory. Hopefully my memory is holding up.

You're referring to an article by Carolyn Wilson which said in part:
Quote:
FREMANTLE football manager Steven Icke looks certain to be appointed to the football operations position at Carlton following the withdrawal of a number of candidates reluctant to deal with the dysfunctional relationship between Denis Pagan and Barry Mitchell.

And the AFL jobs merry-go-round has continued to revolve, with Peter Schwab — another frontrunner for the Blues' position — set to resign as chairman of the AFL's match review panel to take the top job at AFL Victoria.

The Age believes that Icke, 50, the former Kangaroos and Melbourne defender, along with Schwab and former Richmond coach Danny Frawley, were the last three in the running for the Carlton position, an expanded role following Grant Williams' departure earlier this year.

That trio, along with several others approached, all voiced concerns about the seemingly unworkable relationship between Pagan and Northern Bullants coach Mitchell, who applied unsuccessfully for the senior coaching position last September and barely has spoken to Pagan since.

Banished to the other side of Princes Park, Mitchell is continuing to develop the Blues' younger players in an operation virtually everyone in football regards as untenable. Carlton's refusal to rectify the situation has given the impression that it does not regard Pagan as anything but a short-term prospect, a fact not lost during this current interviewing process.


Quote:
Candidates were also given the impression that Pagan was no certainty to survive beyond the 2007 season, although his contract runs until the end of 2008. The contenders were told that part of the position could be to nurture and mentor a younger senior coach as well as keep the club's promising young list together.

Another report the previous day stated that Sticks and Malouf were the interviewers.

I don't believe there was anything about Mitchell in the article (which doesn't seem to be on the net now). The common belief at the time of the article was that the younger coach being referred to was Ratten. But given the history, maybe it was Mitchell.

My point is that Malouf is gone now and Sticks' influence appears to be waning. Were they pushing their own barrow from the Smorgon days or did they have the backing of Pratt? For all we know, Pratt carpeted them when he read the article. Has power transferred to Swann and Icke? If so, what are their views? Interesting questions and I suppose we'll see as the season unfolds.


Yep, that sounded like the one. Thanks. My memory seems to have been a bit wobbly in parts. I guessed they may have been meaning Ratts as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Very interesting Stealth. It'll add a bit of spice this week in the lead-up to what will be an incredibly important game ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:14 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Stealth wrote:
For what it is worth, I heard that by the end of the week there will be a closure to the Barry Mitchell - Dennis Pagan saga. The source said that that either Mitchell or Pagan will be gone. I say the former will get his marching orders rather than the latter. The source seem to say that even Pagan could be shown the door. I find that hard to believe.


I heard that to on the Sports News on Ch 7 last night. Please let it be Denis!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:15 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Stealth wrote:
For what it is worth, I heard that by the end of the week there will be a closure to the Barry Mitchell - Dennis Pagan saga. The source said that that either Mitchell or Pagan will be gone. I say the former will get his marching orders rather than the latter. The source seem to say that even Pagan could be shown the door. I find that hard to believe.

piss off you red and black scumbag troll!!!!

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:19 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
budzy wrote:
Stealth wrote:
For what it is worth, I heard that by the end of the week there will be a closure to the Barry Mitchell - Dennis Pagan saga. The source said that that either Mitchell or Pagan will be gone. I say the former will get his marching orders rather than the latter. The source seem to say that even Pagan could be shown the door. I find that hard to believe.

piss off you red and black scumbag troll!!!!


He's not wrong, I heard the same thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:40 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:53 am
Posts: 53
Location: HEADQUARTERS-CANBERRA
Hey Budzy, I take offence to your comments towards me! I am a blues supporter through and through. No need to get so precious!! Take a chill pill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Stealth wrote:
Hey Budzy, I take offence to your comments towards me! I am a blues supporter through and through. No need to get so precious!! Take a chill pill.


Hope your a right with your mail Stealth. would be great if Pagan is given the arse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:17 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
While I understand why people would want him gone, how could the club justify sacking him this week?

We've been up and about for the past 8 weeks. We've won the Wizard Cup and we played some good football against the Tigers. We lose to Geelong and all of a sudden Pagan has to be sacked.

Look, don't get me wrong, I'd like to see the back of Pagan too, but we'd be crucified, and laughed at again, if we sacked him this week.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
True PJ. Pratt is building momentum with his attempts to improve the club's financial position. Sacking Pagan would bring bad press and undo much of the good work of rebuilding our credibility. Believe it or not, many members would be livid if he were sacked now. That's another card that Pagan's had up his sleeve in the argy-bargy that's been going on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Thing for Pratt is that at the moment, he is the saviour who can do no wrong. I'd venture to say that Pratt would have more clout over the average Carlton supporter than Pagan, particularly after the events of last Saturday night. Better to do it now than later in the season when we might have won more games.

What I don't understand is how come we went back to this bomb-it-long crap against Geelong when we never really did it in the NAB cup. We only bombed it long to 1-1 contests when it suited us, if it didn't work (like against Hawthorn) we waited.

Why go back to that style of play when we know it doesn't work? When the players know it doesn't work?.....

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21597
Location: North of the border
CC the opposition dont play lose man in defence in preseason games its more one on one and traditional set ups thats why we look good. Pagan is all about quick movement to the forward fifty - Coaches who think drop one or two back and we are rooted as we just keep charging forward and kicking to 2 & 3 on 1 situations . Pagan doesn't have a plan to counter act this and he is now saying that Fev need to move to CHF ala Carey where it is a lot harder to effectively play a lose man in the hole . In stead of controlling the ball creating the pace and waiting for the option to present ala Sydney

I hope if on or these two go it is Pagan as Mitchell has done nothing wrong and Pagan should be man enough to realise it . Every person in a position of authority has someone who wants their job its a part of life and you just have to live with it

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Though it is off-topic CC, can I just say that Geelong had us under the hammer in the midfield and I'd say that the pressure affected our decision-making. A case of the opposition not allowing us to play as we wanted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Indie wrote:
Though it is off-topic CC, can I just say that Geelong had us under the hammer in the midfield and I'd say that the pressure affected our decision-making. A case of the opposition not allowing us to play as we wanted.


Agreed. And when we did get the ball, we kicked it away.

Quote:
CC the opposition dont play lose man in defence in preseason games its more one on one and traditional set ups thats why we look good. Pagan is all about quick movement to the forward fifty - Coaches who think drop one or two back and we are rooted as we just keep charging forward and kicking to 2 & 3 on 1 situations . Pagan doesn't have a plan to counter act this and he is now saying that Fev need to move to CHF ala Carey where it is a lot harder to effectively play a lose man in the hole . In stead of controlling the ball creating the pace and waiting for the option to present ala Sydney


Agreed - the players know it doesn't work but there is no plan to counter it. Why? Because it's not practised. We must force sides to play on our terms - 1-on-1 - rather than letting them zone off and run it off their HB line with impunity. We have to look for the free man if Fev is double or triple teamed and get them to kick the goal. Get a few that way, then the opposition realise that they cannot 2x or 3x team Fev otherwise Kennedy or Fisher or whoever will kick 4 or 5 and have them on the skids.

But do we practise this at training? Not according to our regular training watchers...

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Regarding Pratt, the quandary would be the immediate aftermath of a sacking. It would clearly attract negative press. You could just about write the sort of article that Caro would write. It would stress the stupidity of making a decision during the season that the club didn't have the guts to make at the correct time in the offseason. If the reason given for the sacking was Pagan's refusal to work with Mitchell, a lot of the media would take the view espoused by Shaw and condemn the decision. The problem is exacerbated by the NAB Cup success and Round 1 win.

That of itself may see some donations and sponsorships dry up. But it could be a short-lived thing if we start winning under the new coach. If we have a string of losses, however, Pratt's honeymoon may well be over. And don't expect Pagan to go quietly. He'd be making his case in the media, which might provide an unflattering glimpse of the club politics.

Pratt's too canny a bloke to minimise the impact of extended negative press and negative response from some supporters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
If the mail is there that one of the two goes, i would suspect ( prefer ) that it be Pagan.

How would Pagan go at Melb, or for that matter Hawthorn ?
Surely Freo wouldn't want him, and the Eagles are happy with Woosha. Lyon is safe at Moorabbin, Eade not going anywhere. Craig is the man in Adelaide, and surely Port wouldn't sack Williams.
Roos still getting the message across, and Wallet keeps providing enough spin to survive.
Laidley is under the pump for sure, but surely not a Pagan homecoming.
Malthouse is keeping the seat warm for McKenna, Sheedy is safe for a few more years, and Lethal is just about a local up North now.

So where does Pagan go ???

Someone earlier mentioned Manangatang... Well i think this might just be about it.

I think we may just a have a coach is no longer employable... Time to start divorce proceedings.

Oh well.... 8)

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 233 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, Google [Bot], keogh and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group