Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 9:16 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
Stevens again is expected to play 95% helps no one.


He was rotated a lot more than that.


Because what.....you say so? :lol:

If you want to refute my post, come back with something better than that.
When was he off the ground? How long for?

Were you at the game?


No, but I expect when Nick was on my TV screen, it was really him. :wink:


Was he on your TV screen 95% of the time? Did the TV show him coming off the ground a few times or is that something only those who were there (as I was) could pick up?


Last edited by BlueWorld on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
Stevens again is expected to play 95% helps no one.


He was rotated a lot more than that.


Because what.....you say so? :lol:

If you want to refute my post, come back with something better than that.
When was he off the ground? How long for?

Were you at the game?


No, but I expect when Nick was on my TV screen, it was really him. :wink:

Did you see the shorter quarters and longer breaks as well??

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18027
Go annoy someone else Jim. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Blue Vain wrote:
Go annoy someone else Jim. :lol:

I'm just shocked that you can stand there and point the finger when you really don't know, do you?

I'm not here to annoy you, but I can see how what you're doing might annoy the hell out of some people.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:52 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Jim, you annoy everyone.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
You're life, Jim, but not as we know it.....


:wink:

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Wild Blue Yonder wrote:
Jim, you annoy everyone.

Even if you were remotely accurate, do you think that by constantly flogging the same point at me I'd actually start listening to you?

I dare say after reading that you'll be thinking that I employ the same tactic, and that would confirm for me just how far wrong you are when it comes to understanding anything about me.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
*AHEM*

please everyone, stick to the topic at hand and not go off on a tangent with your personal likes and dislikes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:45 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
One of the players you mentioned was one of the most instinctive and free spirited players I've seen in junior ranks. He is now a back pocket in his 4th year of AFL football.
Yet he was the second best ranked player in the country!.
Tell me what improvements specifically have you seen in Andrew Walker since his first game 3 years ago?


I think AW can now play on Russell Robertson (who has routinely killed us) and give him a bath. As with most players he is a work in progress but I think his defensive development will see him being an elite player in all aspects over the next few years, when we do become contenders. Re Russell, in his few NAB games this year he has looked like a player with a purpose who belongs out there. By his own admission (in recent interview) his confidence levels wane quickly. Being able to run with top players and reduce their effectiveness will be doing a lot for his confidence - he hasn't dropped his head in marking contests recently.

Defence, discipline and accountability wins flags. Doing the 1%s wins flags. Geelong played exciting attractive creative footy in the late 80s and early to mid 90s. They thrashed lesser sides. But when the pressure was really applied, they were forward of the ball, lacked defensive discipline and were flogged and missed a golden chance to snag a flag.

I am no great fan of DP but I don't see accountability, defence, pressure as being a weakness in his approach. Sure we need more creativity, but we need the basics first. It's not about 07 it is about 08/09. Young players need to be developed at the rate that suits the individuals to be great then not battlers off the bench now. I would like Blackwell and Edwards and Bower to have a game, but waiting won't kill them, it may benefit them. I don't think the tactics have been too bad in the NAB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18027
Yep, I agree with most of that Gerry.
I also agree that players need a defensive side but a balance needs to be obtained. Lets hope that JR will learn to find the ball in time because he has the ability to be a quality attacking player.

With the gameplan, I also agree it has been quite good. Our tactics have also been quite good with our only real blemish being the handling of Shannon Grant before half time.
When Thompson went off and Grant came on, we allowed Carlos and T/Bird to be his opponents and he singlehandedly got them back in to the contest.
Perhaps that is something the players should take charge of as well.

I cant stand Grant but he is a gun footballer on his day. :evil:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:00 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
I cant stand Grant but he is a gun footballer on his day


Yeah he is a little cheat and I can't forgive him for winning the Norm Smith against us, and taking us apart with 20 mins of footy in various games, but he has super ability. I am hoping over the next few years Joe Anderson can become our quick, close checking defender to shut down guys like Grant and Davey


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:25 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
Stevens again is expected to play 95% helps no one.


He was rotated a lot more than that.


Because what.....you say so? :lol:

If you want to refute my post, come back with something better than that.
When was he off the ground? How long for?

Were you at the game?


No, but I expect when Nick was on my TV screen, it was really him. :wink:

You didn't notice down the bottom of your TV screen the words "Off Stevens" at least 4 times or see him shown sitting on the bench just before half time?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18027
You're like a dog with a bone with this one, are'nt you BlueWorld? :lol:

My point is that Stevens plays the overwhelming majority of games in the midfield to his detriment.
He has broken down the past couple of years with wear and tear injuries because we drive him into the ground.
I thought it would be a good idea to give one of the kids a run in the middle during the nab cup to give Stevens a rest and to give a kid some experience but hey, its just my opinion.
That is what the bench is for. To rest your players instead of sitting players there that you dont want to play.

For the record, the game went for 105.25 minutes on Saturday.
Nick Stevens came off for 2.5 minutes in the first quarter.
He was dragged to put the dunces hat on for giving away a 50 for 90 seconds in the second.
He was then rested for 3 minutes at the end of the quarter.
He came off for 2.5 minutes in the 3rd quarter and played a fair portion of the forwardline up forward.
In the last quarter, he came off in the last 2 minutes.

By my calculations, he played about 94 minutes of a 105.5 minute game.
Of the 4 quarters, he played 3 in the centre square or on the wing!

If you think they're acceptable rotations, we're talking a different game.

Can we agree to disagree now? :)

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:58 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Blue Vain wrote:
You're like a dog with a bone with this one, are'nt you BlueWorld? :lol:

My point is that Stevens plays the overwhelming majority of games in the midfield to his detriment.
He has broken down the past couple of years with wear and tear injuries because we drive him into the ground.
I thought it would be a good idea to give one of the kids a run in the middle during the nab cup to give Stevens a rest and to give a kid some experience but hey, its just my opinion.
That is what the bench is for. To rest your players instead of sitting players there that you dont want to play.

For the record, the game went for 105.25 minutes on Saturday.
Nick Stevens came off for 2.5 minutes in the first quarter.
He was dragged to put the dunces hat on for giving away a 50 for 90 seconds in the second.
He was then rested for 3 minutes at the end of the quarter.
He came off for 2.5 minutes in the 3rd quarter and played a fair portion of the forwardline up forward.
In the last quarter, he came off in the last 2 minutes.

By my calculations, he played about 94 minutes of a 105.5 minute game.
Of the 4 quarters, he played 3 in the centre square or on the wing!

If you think they're acceptable rotations, we're talking a different game.

Can we agree to disagree now? :)


You said he played 95% of the game. He appeared to spend a lot more time off the ground than last year from my observations but I don't actually know the exact amounts. I did not count how many times he came off during the game or how long he spent on the bench. I noted 4 times when I watched the replay but according to you it was 5!!! :lol: I did not bother noting how long he spent off each time. Nor did I note how long he spent out of the midfield (he lined up at times on the wing but I did not note how many times). By your calculations he spent 89% of the game on the ground. And you say I'm like a dog with a bone! :shock: :lol:

I did not make any comment on whether I thought the rotations were acceptable. They appear to me to have improved. I'm sure you know that rightly or wrongly Pagan is treating these games as full dress rehearsals for the season proper so what we are seeing now is likely to continue all season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18027
Good night BlueWorld. :)

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:52 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
tut tut Blue Vain, inflating and abusing the noble art of statistics like that. :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:57 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Blue Vain wrote:
For the record, the game went for 105.25 minutes on Saturday.
Nick Stevens came off for 2.5 minutes in the first quarter.
He was dragged to put the dunces hat on for giving away a 50 for 90 seconds in the second.
He was then rested for 3 minutes at the end of the quarter.
He came off for 2.5 minutes in the 3rd quarter and played a fair portion of the forwardline up forward.
In the last quarter, he came off in the last 2 minutes.

By my calculations, he played about 94 minutes of a 105.5 minute game.
Of the 4 quarters, he played 3 in the centre square or on the wing!


Thank you.

I agree, but if he were playing 94 minutes per game in the season proper, I'd be more than satisfied.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mickstar, sinbagger and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group