grrofunger wrote:
yeah lets compare picking up ackland to adolf hitler
how ridiculous - this is a football club not world politics/war
support the club and the players - last time i checked ackland hadn't led a dictatorship or a holocaust , heck he isnt even one of the players who was named for drug taking and hasnt been involved in any night club dramas
he wil be a good player for us and he is a carlton player - if you cant bring yourself to support the players - why support the team/club?
not that many people support the club anymore - its not fashionable around here
everyone wants to be synbad
i support the club i do not support stupidity...
Stupidity is what makes my club weak....
He will be a good player will he???
well he might have one good year.... (if were lucky)
He is soft... he doesnt hold his ground ... he likes to play WIDE... he is short for a ruckman not good enough to play as a KPP.. he doesnt have a midfield strong enough yet to even make him look adequate.
Flicked by Port...
StKilda didnt think he was a ruckman last year... thats why they brought in a guy like Gardiner.. who has a shot body.. and a guy called Rix who they drafted in aged 25 or 26 took over their ruck..
Alot of the time Blake rucked for them... 189 cms...
Now please understand this bit.....
How is Ackland any better than what we already have!!!
If we bring in a guy onto our list on a three year contract (and everything that involves up the track like paying him for three years and having our own players asking for three years or they will leave) he must be a full cut above what we already have here...
Is he a cut above what we have????
Tell me how he is a cut above!!!
If were going through all that trouble to bring him to the club with the fallout and risk that entails up the track... what are you expecting him to play like???
Will he shine in our list or will he be like all the others we bring in and delist..???
Thats how you look at a situation if you had a brain...