Maybe Priestley has footy acumen but I would prefer someone independent like a Bartel
So are you saying that you don't really have an issue with Priestly being on the panel as such, you just want an independent on as well? Here is the thing to me and it involves some history that’s important
When Elliott was thrown out in 2002 the club was in debt to its eyeballs. So much so that if it wasn’t for the AFL giving us a written guarantee that they would lend us a hand we may have become extinct
If it wasn’t for the Mathiesons and Pratt’s financial assistance we would still be in debt
As stated by Swan McKay who was on the official board after Elliott was told to
pack his bags the board’s sole focus was to get out of debt
So football matters and footy performance were forgotten according to to Swan.
I'm not sure what your point is with this story . No money, means no club, means no football to play.
After we got fined the best part of $1 Million in 2002, I was at a Supporters day early in 2003. I was talking to a then Board Member. Can't remember his name but he was a Solicitor. Big, heavy set guy, late 50's. He told me the Club had informed the AFL that Carlton was so destitute, it was a month away from becoming insolvent and handing the keys to Club back to the AFL. So I'm not surprised with the Money first attitude by the Board. The problem is that’s still the case.
The board got us out of debt a few years ago but there is no plan to remove us from the 4 poker machine venues thus Mathiesons influence thus becoming a progressive club in 2026 and beyond
I think the club has done some good stuff but they have been crap as well
Case in point
In 2013 Mick Malthouse wanted Carrazzo and Scotland as captains but the board overruled the decision in favour of poster boy Marc Murphy because his face on the merchandise sold more.
That should not happen
13 years ago Keogh. 13. No-one from those days is still on today's Board. Malthouse lasted 54 games. I met the man many times. Having an opinion doesn't make him the Oracle. When that position all of a sudden became vacant Tim Lincoln proposed that Mike Fitzpatrick should be the 8 th member
The board members as a collective disagreed. Michael was probably too smart for them in a footy sense to be a member
Fitzpatrick was disgusted but worse than that Tim Lincoln left as well
https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/rogue-ca ... c-18295002I'm thinking Lincoln's biggest issue was not telling anyone of his plan. If Lincoln went rogue and made a meal of it I'm not surprise he left. You make it sound like it was the Boards fault with this. How can they be at fault when one guy goes off on a tangent. Sounds like even Fitzy was in the dark.This board really just looks after itself first
They are the one constant in all of this
They escape scrutiny except for one night in February
When the club fails onfield they use yet another scapegoat in this case both Voss and Austin as was the case last week for the continual failure of this club’s football performance
I would have thought the Clubs performances are largely based on the Coach and the Recruiting Manager. Someone carries the can and those two are at the top of the tree for getting things right. The Board isn't Coaching or Drafting Players. Correct me if I am wrong, but haven't you criticised both Voss and Austin consistently over their journey?I refuse to be member because these people are the problem and escape scrutiny but if 8 people challenged them I would become a member and vote them out
Would you? Would you, really?