Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Sep 19, 2025 4:56 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 6:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 15253
Location: Sydney
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 8:55 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7711
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 8:57 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7581
Location: NowHere.....
I guess without all the details it's hard to know what the whole story is.

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7711
Lace Out wrote:
I guess without all the details it's hard to know what the whole story is.

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk


Yes , its the lack of details that make it stink to high heaven . It wreaks of a sweep it under the carpet type of solution. Our hierarchy have been strangely silent on this . This Patti Kinnersly chick gives me the herby jeebies . A strange cat .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 15253
Location: Sydney
Mickstar wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .


OK if it was them and only them then that does smell pretty whiffy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2025 10:05 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7711
GreatEx wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .


OK if it was them and only them then that does smell pretty whiffy


Either way the whole thing is off . When people are encouraged to come forward and speak with indemnity and because of there actions are given the flick , that's off . I don't think the number of people turfed comes into it . This Patti Kinnersley chick needs to speak in the light of her involvement in the Carlton Respects bizzo . She is the driver of it . She brought it to the Club after all .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2025 11:43 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10556
Location: Australia
I'd never be a whistleblower, I've seen too many people punished for speaking out over my career, it's a massive personal risk. Sometimes you need to know when to walk away, big organisations can easily destroy your life with little inconvenience to themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2025 12:24 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7711
sinbagger wrote:
I'd never be a whistleblower, I've seen too many people punished for speaking out over my career, it's a massive personal risk. Sometimes you need to know when to walk away, big organisations can easily destroy your life with little inconvenience to themselves.


Well if this is the way the Carlton Football Club are going to conduct business we would have to be worried . There has never been a question about Wrights credentials on footy matters . However , being a CEO requires a lot of business nous . Hopefully Wright is up to speed in this area . The silence on this matter is deafening .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2025 6:44 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:11 pm
Posts: 714
Mickstar wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .
Wow.

Not the answer I was expecting.

They're not even trying to make it look inconspicuous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2025 7:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7711
BamBam7 wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .
Wow.

Not the answer I was expecting.

They're not even trying to make it look inconspicuous.


There was some dodgy shit with regard to proceeds from a raffle . Getting more Suss by the minute . Great start GW .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2025 7:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7711
Mickstar wrote:
BamBam7 wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .
Wow.

Not the answer I was expecting.

They're not even trying to make it look inconspicuous.


There was some dodgy shit with regard to proceeds from a raffle . Getting more Suss by the minute . Great start GW .


And the senior staffer no longer with us is Daniel Giese . Spelling might not be spot on but close .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2025 11:12 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 8123
Location: Bendigo
Mickstar wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
How many people were made redundant in the restructure?


Only the whistleblowers .

“Four changes to the executive team, and their respective departments.”

From the club statement.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2025 2:38 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1232
bondiblue wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
"Reports this week have suggested the Blues are open for business on trades for its megastars." (Reports we made, by the way.)

And that's how footy media works. Say something, then spend two days getting people's reaction to the thing you yourself said... then another day saying the opposite, but reporting on 'speculation'.



Every team would say the same, but do you a source for that quote from anyone at Carlton?

Or, is it something that came from here

Quote:
It comes after veteran AFL journalist Damian Barrett said Wright, who’s expected to take over from Brian Cook as early as July, would be prepared to shake things up at the Blues and could be willing to listen to trade offers for the pair of Coleman medallists.

“They’ve got some big-name players on big contracts. I’ve got no doubt, in fact I know, that if a club was to come to the Carlton footy club and Graham Wright with a feasible offer for some of those names, he will engage,” Barrett told Nine’s Footy Classified.

“Curnow and McKay ... if you want to put a proposal to them with three (or) two first-round draft picks, do it. The conversation can be had, and I would imagine will be had.”


https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-trade-news-2025-nasiah-wanganeenmilera-could-become-next-10-million-man-carlton-blues-laugh-off-charlie-curnow-departure-rumours/news-story/ff7c95736104353440a9729f8dbed65f

Ralphy made a similar comment/ innuendo on Monday along with an even more outlandish headline that bla bla plus bla bla bla would be

quote]"meaning Williams on a million dollars this year, with next year to come"


This is exactly Barrets wording....

Quote:
“They’ve got some big-name players on big contracts. I’ve got no doubt, in fact I know, that if a club was to come to the Carlton footy club and Graham Wright with a feasible offer for some of those names, he will engage,” Barrett told Nine’s Footy Classified.

“Curnow and McKay ... if you want to put a proposal to them with three (or) two first-round draft picks, do it. The conversation can be had, and I would imagine will be had.”


Can you understand what he's doing? He's making shit up knowing everyone would be courteous enough to take a call from someone in their industry and hear what someone wants to say :grin:

THAT IS NOT FACT, that is common sense. If you believe Barrett you're a fool, and I'd advise anyone to not let him trick you with his wording, which is mostly ambiguous to catch a headline like bluechampion alludes to.

Today on afl.com video Barrett said when asked by fellow compare

Quote:
"Is it Fact or Furphy" what you said on Monday?",


After taking a minute to pause and think of an answer that will not get him in more trouble he then said

Quote:
" Its a fact that the conversation should be had"
OMG :lol: What a fkwit.

Then Barret continued with

Quote:
" Potentially, Wright will explore any conversation"
...that's the common sense I'm talking about. No one has told Barrett anything....and he finishes off with a classic (braithy are you reading this?)

Quote:
"6 players take up the entire salary Cap".
Have you heard anything so stupid? Implies the other 38 players are not getting paid.

TDK hasn't signed yet. Walshy is next year. Who are the 6? Harry Charlie Weiters and Cripps...who are the other 2? Oh Williams, ofcourse it is. Yeah right.

AS far as I am concerned, I have seen no evidence that anything has come from the club,let alone Wright. Nothing confirmed either amongst the jounos making up stories, and its just standard Carlton headlines based on journo's of mainsteam media speculating and footy forums passing on that speculation from media and presenting it asfact. :lol:

And the response to Barrets "Facts" from his colleagues:

Quote:
But McFarlane and Ralph were in agreement that no such deals would eventuate.

“Absolutely no chance they’ll entertain an offer on Charlie Curnow. All this talk about Charlie could be up ... he’s staying,” McFarlane said on Fox Footy.

Ralph said: “Basically, what they’ve said to us today is if there was a unicorn shop where we could lose one unicorn and they could go and get another one, they’d be more than happy to trade ... they have basically laughed about this situation.

“There’s no way that they’ll be trading him. There are very few players in the AFL who are untradeable, untouchable — he is one of them.”

On the chances of McKay being dealt, Ralph said: “Again, there’s no way they’ll trade him, in a draft that is very weak on key-position players. He’s been involved in three wins; he’s won two of those games off his boot this year.


Bloody speculators tricking our Blue Brethren, how embarrassment. :wink: [/quote]


Such a good post. Damian Barret plays this word slippage game every time he puts his dumb mug on AFL.com.au. It's like he thinks he's the smart guy in the room with all the wordsmithing millions he's made from talking shit anybody else would be embarrassed to write. I bet he thinks nobody in punterland is onto his bullcrap. I wonder how he gets treated when he is in the club rooms, any club, do they humour him for safety reasons or do they show him the irnoic contempt he deserves?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 90 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group