GreatEx wrote:
Weren't Brisbane miles off it when they brought in Hodge?
I think it depends why you bring in the old timers. If it's just: well he was an important piece of a premiership team, past his best but let's hope he feels rejuvenated by the challenge and becomes our best at his position..
That's bad. If it's: we have some young talent but they're being poorly led by blokes who are too comfortable with losing and need someone to set standards... that's good.
I've no idea how Elliott and Mihocek are as leaders. Elliott seems an introverted type to me, but I don't really know. He'd certainly have plenty to share on small forward craft and goalkicking technique. Mihocek I think could be a great fit if Charlie leaves.
Exactly.
We need to start doing something different and that is bringing in players that know how to win and want to win at all costs.
Elliot and Mihocek are just an example of who we should be looking at, whoever we look at needs to have had premiership success or at least sustained finals success.
I mentioned these two as they have been identified as disgruntled un-contracted players that still have a couple of years left in them.
If we want to change the 'losing' culture, then this is one step in doing that.
Sacking the whole coaching department or blowing the list up, is the epitome of a losing mentality IMO.
And that has not worked for us in 20 years.
It's our version of Stockholm Syndrome, we are happiest when the club makes the above losing decisions because we can justify the losses to ourselves and have some sort of false hope, again.
The worst part is that is this is the way we destroy players through over working them at a young age or they get a form of entitlement as they are needed to win games, not a cog in the machine playing a role.
Time for some change, time to build.