Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 6:34 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
CK95 wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
CK95 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You look way younger than your age Bondi. Maybe you wind back the clock 5 minutes for every line of your posts :lol:

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


if that's the case he's genuinely 14 minutes old. he still smells like placenta!


I reckon Bondi dictates his posts, there’s no way he types all those words, I’ve seen him pecking at his phone keyboard like a chicken stalking a cockroach, he’s a one word a minute guy.
I hear he uses his dictaphone.....

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


I don't touch phones. Dangerous things. I know the damage they do.
I only have one in my pocket for the vibration feature.
Thats why I constantly get a rise in the Levis, and why I dont answer my phone.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:40 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2129
If winning at clearances is the aim, surely having Sir George Hewett in the team is required.

He gives you that extra midfield option, extra muscle, extra rotation. It is too early to bring Hollands in there than for more than small stints. He doesn't have the years and years of experience yet.

Hewett -vs Brisbane Rd 1 - 27 possessions,
Hewett - vs GWS Rd Rd 7 - 31 possessions..
etc.
You can look up the rest of his stats. He gets his hands dirty.

Owies or Orazia...I think this match proves it has to be Owies. Orazia just doesn't do the inner pack work that is required from time to time. Owies bleeds for the team.
Maybe Orazia can still squeeze in the team Sub..or something, but not in front of Owies.

Carlton lost this match at the selection table.


Last edited by tap in 79 on Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35647
Location: Half back flank
Sydney Blue wrote:
CK95 wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Sorry CK I didn’t get to talk more, but I didn’t want to distract you from spending time with your kids.



I wish you had have :lol:

All good sinbagger, was nice meeting you, & like Bondi you looked younger than I expected. TC must be like the opposite of tinder really :lol:

OK by me for the pic but hopefully I don't break too many computer screens.....


Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk
Did I look older :)
Ok to use pic




Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk
I think we all aged about 10 years after that second quarter.....

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35647
Location: Half back flank
tap in 79 wrote:
If winning at clearances is the aim, surely having Sir George Hewett in the team is required.

He gives you that extra midfield option, extra muscle, extra rotation. It is too early to bring Hollands in there than for more than small stints. He doesn't have the years and years of experience yet.

Hewett -vs Brisbane Rd 1 - 27 possessions,
Hewett - vs GWS Rd Rd 7 - 31 possessions..
etc.
You can look up the rest of his stats. He gets his hands dirty.

Owies or Orazia...I think this match proves it has to be Owies. Orazia just doesn't do the inner pack work that is required from time to time. Owies bleeds for the team.
Maybe Orazia can still squeeze in the team Sub..or something, but not in front of Owies.

Carlton lost this match at the selection table.
Fair.

I reckon we were arrogant at selection. Cottrell also.

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
Sydney Blue wrote:
If Weiters had not got injured he would have stayed on Hogan but was on one leg so undersized Kemp was given the task.


Not sure which game you were watching but Kemp had Hogan from the first bounce. Abysmal decision by the MC that cost us badly.
Weitering played on Riccardi and Cadman who dragged Weitering away from Hogan and isolated Kemp beautifully.

Lots of talk about 1 ruck but Iet's be honest, when we've played 1 ruck this year, we've won 9 out of 10 games. When we've played 2 rucks we've won 2 out of 6 games. I wouldn't be wetting the bed just yet. The odds of success are still massively in favour of 1 ruck.

As for scoring from stoppage, have a deeper look at the numbers. We actually won more stoppages than GWS but it was the outcome that went in their favour. Their key forwards stood under the high ball and marked it too easily. They weren't being laced out. We scored more from centre bounce than they did but it was Hogan that was the difference. We had a total of 8 marks inside 50 for the match. Hogan had 6 himself.
The majority of our score originated from the defensive half where the majority of theirs came from the forward half. They weren't lacing Hogan out from centre bounces on the lead. He was standing and taking pack marks unhindered because Kemp doesn't have the size, strength or nous to impeded his positioning.

As for TDK, I wouldn't be placing the blame on him. Apart from Cripps, our mids were very disappointing. Numerous times I watched Hollands and Cerra peel off Coniglio at stoppages and let him win the ball unimpeded. Walsh was well below his best. Firstly unable to shake the tag of Bedford and when Bedford went to Cripps, Walsh was monstered by Green.
TDK was still the 2nd highest rated player on the ground. 24 possessions, 16 contested, equal game high 11 clearances, equal 2nd most ground ball gets for Carlton. Briggs had more hitouts but didn't have any more score involvements than Tom.

The 2 ruck argument is a furphy IMHO. It's round 17 and we just lost our first game for the year when playing 1 ruck! Our first loss! To a team that played with 1 ruck.
The Hogan match up cost us the game. It was terrible planning and even worse, we did nothing to change it. Just my opinion.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:54 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2129
CK95 wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
If winning at clearances is the aim, surely having Sir George Hewett in the team is required.

He gives you that extra midfield option, extra muscle, extra rotation. It is too early to bring Hollands in there than for more than small stints. He doesn't have the years and years of experience yet.

Hewett -vs Brisbane Rd 1 - 27 possessions,
Hewett - vs GWS Rd Rd 7 - 31 possessions..
etc.
You can look up the rest of his stats. He gets his hands dirty.

Owies or Orazia...I think this match proves it has to be Owies. Orazia just doesn't do the inner pack work that is required from time to time. Owies bleeds for the team.
Maybe Orazia can still squeeze in the team Sub..or something, but not in front of Owies.

Carlton lost this match at the selection table.
Fair.

I reckon we were arrogant at selection. Cottrell also.

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


I agree. It could have appeared to the GWS as arrogant - the selections. Tom Green is a tough midfielder, he would have been perfect for Hewett. Frees up Cripps to do more.

Loading up on half forward flankers/wingers. They were basically saying "we can take on your midfielders one player down." That was the impression I got. Cerra only 2nd match back and Cotterell - too many players needing time to get up to speed. Cerra was average last week too (first week back) so I guess they were expecting marked improvement?

Owies looked piss##ed that he was the sub. He has the eye of the tiger that guy. Not sure if he does enough but he is better than most.


Last edited by tap in 79 on Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
2023 Cameron Cox
2022 Biclavs Stanley
2021 Gawn Jackson

Last 3 premiership teams all played 2 rucks
Obviously didn't affect their turnover game

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk



We wont go into a GF with one ruck....imo

Lets remember what we are saying here.
One ruck is either TDK or Pitto
We wont play without TDK.
TDK is a dangerous Fwd ruck if Pitto was preferred as the ruck.

TDK stretches backlines and takes a tall defender away from Harry and Charlie.
Not only that, we dont lose Harry in the ruck and Harry or Charlie can swap roaming outside of 50 taking their man away from double teaming Charlie as well a link up mark ... without having to defend against the oppo ruckman.....ditto TDK...he can take away another tall....charlie has all the space to lead and jump...instead of this stupid bodying tactic against heavier opponents. in Top 8 teams...imo

Have a look at the Top 8 now.
If one believes in "Horses for Courses"
Which team will TDK be sole ruck against?

McStay is back for Pies soon ie Cameron Cox are back
Freo Darcy Jackson
bla bla bla

I don't think Vossy can bank on TDK having a purple patch, and after last night and the fatigue and soreness which followed with TDK playing 80% ruck in his best game against Geelong, he couldn't back it up the next week....who knows if he will or wont be purple week in week out from next week through to the GF? Its a huge risk, then there's injury risk during the game. He wasn't purple imo last night.

People can have their preferences, but they shouldn't believe TDK as the sole ruck is the only way we can win, nor should they believe there's no way Vossy will go with 2 rucks.

We will see.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:54 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8119
bondiblue wrote:
Pressure Points by the quarter

GWS........187-234-231-198
Carlton ....194-184-176-169


Wow, no wonder we got absolutely pantsed in the middle 2 quarters. Our pressure rating was 50+ behind that of GWS.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:57 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8119
Blue Vain wrote:
Not sure which game you were watching but Kemp had Hogan from the first bounce. Abysmal decision by the MC that cost us badly.
Weitering played on Riccardi and Cadman who dragged Weitering away from Hogan and isolated Kemp beautifully.


Completely agree. Can understand the coaching panel trying something. But why O why did they persist with it, since Hogan was doing so much damage?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:58 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
CK95 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You look way younger than your age Bondi. Maybe you wind back the clock 5 minutes for every line of your posts :lol:

Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk


if that's the case he's genuinely 14 minutes old. he still smells like placenta!


I reckon Bondi dictates his posts, there’s no way he types all those words, I’ve seen him pecking at his phone keyboard like a chicken stalking a cockroach, he’s a one word a minute guy.



I find it difficult to type on phones

I use AI in my converted Walky Talky I bought in the 80's.

It reads my mind. That's where the speed comes from.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 11:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18479
Location: threeohfivethree
CK95 wrote:
I hear he uses his dictaphone.....

Which end is the mouthpiece?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 11:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
bondiblue wrote:
Pressure Points by the quarter

GWS........187-234-231-198
Carlton ....194-184-176-169


That's the killer. The best pressure team in the AFL were served a bit of their own medicine.
The positive is, we lost by 2 goals and we know if we bring the heat, we shouldn't be beaten. That's huge bonus.
If you know you are almost unbeatable if you play at your best, everything is in your control.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 11:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2129
bondiblue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
2023 Cameron Cox
2022 Biclavs Stanley
2021 Gawn Jackson

Last 3 premiership teams all played 2 rucks
Obviously didn't affect their turnover game

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk



We wont go into a GF with one ruck....imo

Lets remember what we are saying here.
One ruck is either TDK or Pitto
We wont play without TDK.
TDK is a dangerous Fwd ruck if Pitto was preferred as the ruck.

TDK stretches backlines and takes a tall defender away from Harry and Charlie.
Not only that, we dont lose Harry in the ruck and Harry or Charlie can swap roaming outside of 50 taking their man away from double teaming Charlie as well a link up mark ... without having to defend against the oppo ruckman.....ditto TDK...he can take away another tall....charlie has all the space to lead and jump...instead of this stupid bodying tactic against heavier opponents. in Top 8 teams...imo

Have a look at the Top 8 now.
If one believes in "Horses for Courses"
Which team will TDK be sole ruck against?

McStay is back for Pies soon ie Cameron Cox are back
Freo Darcy Jackson
bla bla bla

I don't think Vossy can bank on TDK having a purple patch, and after last night and the fatigue and soreness which followed with TDK playing 80% ruck in his best game against Geelong, he couldn't back it up the next week....who knows if he will or wont be purple week in week out from next week through to the GF? Its a huge risk, then there's injury risk during the game. He wasn't purple imo last night.

People can have their preferences, but they shouldn't believe TDK as the sole ruck is the only way we can win, nor should they believe there's no way Vossy will go with 2 rucks.

We will see.



You left out 2017/2020 in your stats.
Richmond
Nankervis 25 hit outs...only real ruckman= 2020 GF.

Maybe Carlton structures up better with one ruckman (considering win/loss)
Carlton won in 1987 and 1995 with one real ruckman. It can occur.

It is a work in progress. For some reason the wins flow more naturally with one ruckman and maybe it is a speed factor. There is extra pace around the ground with that option for a runner. Pittonet seems to me to jog aimlessly after the ruck contest. Could be just an impression. He may well make the structure better Rd 20-23... never know.

It is a 50/50 thing for me though.

Also, don't assume Carlton will make the GF. Any team in the top 4 can make it. Stay hungry. No complacency. Plenty of examples of teams expecting to sail into gf and didn't do it. Preliminary finals are a battle royale no matter who is in it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 11:27 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4407
Location: Perth
Performance was so bad it killed TC.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 4:18 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3182
Location: Whistler
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
If Weiters had not got injured he would have stayed on Hogan but was on one leg so undersized Kemp was given the task.


Not sure which game you were watching but Kemp had Hogan from the first bounce. Abysmal decision by the MC that cost us badly.
Weitering played on Riccardi and Cadman who dragged Weitering away from Hogan and isolated Kemp beautifully.

Lots of talk about 1 ruck but Iet's be honest, when we've played 1 ruck this year, we've won 9 out of 10 games. When we've played 2 rucks we've won 2 out of 6 games. I wouldn't be wetting the bed just yet. The odds of success are still massively in favour of 1 ruck.

As for scoring from stoppage, have a deeper look at the numbers. We actually won more stoppages than GWS but it was the outcome that went in their favour. Their key forwards stood under the high ball and marked it too easily. They weren't being laced out. We scored more from centre bounce than they did but it was Hogan that was the difference. We had a total of 8 marks inside 50 for the match. Hogan had 6 himself.
The majority of our score originated from the defensive half where the majority of theirs came from the forward half. They weren't lacing Hogan out from centre bounces on the lead. He was standing and taking pack marks unhindered because Kemp doesn't have the size, strength or nous to impeded his positioning.

As for TDK, I wouldn't be placing the blame on him. Apart from Cripps, our mids were very disappointing. Numerous times I watched Hollands and Cerra peel off Coniglio at stoppages and let him win the ball unimpeded. Walsh was well below his best. Firstly unable to shake the tag of Bedford and when Bedford went to Cripps, Walsh was monstered by Green.
TDK was still the 2nd highest rated player on the ground. 24 possessions, 16 contested, equal game high 11 clearances, equal 2nd most ground ball gets for Carlton. Briggs had more hitouts but didn't have any more score involvements than Tom.

The 2 ruck argument is a furphy IMHO. It's round 17 and we just lost our first game for the year when playing 1 ruck! Our first loss! To a team that played with 1 ruck.
The Hogan match up cost us the game. It was terrible planning and even worse, we did nothing to change it. Just my opinion.



Thanks for the analysis BV. Looks like you are in good form!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 6:56 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21382
Location: North of the border
Headplant wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
If Weiters had not got injured he would have stayed on Hogan but was on one leg so undersized Kemp was given the task.


Not sure which game you were watching but Kemp had Hogan from the first bounce. Abysmal decision by the MC that cost us badly.
Weitering played on Riccardi and Cadman who dragged Weitering away from Hogan and isolated Kemp beautifully.

Lots of talk about 1 ruck but Iet's be honest, when we've played 1 ruck this year, we've won 9 out of 10 games. When we've played 2 rucks we've won 2 out of 6 games. I wouldn't be wetting the bed just yet. The odds of success are still massively in favour of 1 ruck.

As for scoring from stoppage, have a deeper look at the numbers. We actually won more stoppages than GWS but it was the outcome that went in their favour. Their key forwards stood under the high ball and marked it too easily. They weren't being laced out. We scored more from centre bounce than they did but it was Hogan that was the difference. We had a total of 8 marks inside 50 for the match. Hogan had 6 himself.
The majority of our score originated from the defensive half where the majority of theirs came from the forward half. They weren't lacing Hogan out from centre bounces on the lead. He was standing and taking pack marks unhindered because Kemp doesn't have the size, strength or nous to impeded his positioning.

As for TDK, I wouldn't be placing the blame on him. Apart from Cripps, our mids were very disappointing. Numerous times I watched Hollands and Cerra peel off Coniglio at stoppages and let him win the ball unimpeded. Walsh was well below his best. Firstly unable to shake the tag of Bedford and when Bedford went to Cripps, Walsh was monstered by Green.
TDK was still the 2nd highest rated player on the ground. 24 possessions, 16 contested, equal game high 11 clearances, equal 2nd most ground ball gets for Carlton. Briggs had more hitouts but didn't have any more score involvements than Tom.

The 2 ruck argument is a furphy IMHO. It's round 17 and we just lost our first game for the year when playing 1 ruck! Our first loss! To a team that played with 1 ruck.
The Hogan match up cost us the game. It was terrible planning and even worse, we did nothing to change it. Just my opinion.



Thanks for the analysis BV. Looks like you are in good form!!
As usual BV is full of crap.
Hogan spent 60 % of the first quarter in the defensive part of the ground.
When he left the forward 50 Kemp went with him and Weiters stayed back.
In the 2nd quarter Weiters was off for all bar the last 2 minutes. The 3rd quarter Weiters was on one leg.
1st and 2nd quarters from Hogan
Yes I want my best KPD chasing his opponent into the back half of the ground.
Notice how deep Hogan positions himself when Weiters was off ImageImage

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 7:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
Typical Syd deflection. Show's us where Hogan is but doesn't offer one instance of Weitering playing on him.
Watch the replay. I can demonstrate a dozen instances where Kemp is playing on him. Both inside 50 and outside. Can you provide any of Weitering playing on him? Any at all?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 7:57 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
Sydney Blue wrote:
2023 Cameron Cox
2022 Biclavs Stanley
2021 Gawn Jackson

Last 3 premiership teams all played 2 rucks
Obviously didn't affect their turnover game

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk



.... jeez mate you're really slow. or you just don't read. it's not so much the 2 rucks that's the problem, it's the 3 key forwards we're left with up front. too tall, slow and not enough defensive pressure.

pies and dees didnt have two big key forwards who do not much else like we do. when we go two rucks, we have 3 key forwards, and that's too many. do you just not remember how slow we move the ball into our F50, with 3 key forwards? and then, how quickly the ball rebounds out, back the other way for a score??

it's why our win/loss record with 2 rucks/ 3 key forwards is so poor. we're not troubling anyone in september with that set up. harry needs to toughen up and start playing like a ruck when he's in the middle. if he applied himself like jack, we wouldn't be having this tiresome convo. also, if chalrie could run and pursue and maybe lay a tackle every now and then, that'd be great too. but he doesn't ...


and the cats, with biclavs are a massive outlier bcos that guy moves better in traffic than hewett, kennedy and cripps all put together, and runs faster than walsh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:13 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Posts: 1806
bondiblue wrote:
daggs001 wrote:
I took the kids to the match. Not much atmosphere last night it must be said.
Bondi i don't agree with Acres. His first 3 kicks (from memory as i haven't watched the replay) were turnovers. He set the tone for the team
early. I thought his output was well down on his previous 6 weeks or so. He must must must tidy up his disposal before finals.

When Weiters went off and Kemp started to panic and despair (his body language at the game was terrible), I was hoping Gov stood up and took some pressure off the kid. He was the one that had to take some ownership down back as he plays taller than he is but he has little impact at the marking contests.
A few of his disposals also resulted in costly turnovers. Senior player on some good coin in the last few years. Time for him to take on some responsibility like Newman has and step up. He doesn't do enough. He is always around that 14 or 15 disposal figure and he just doesn't hurt the opposition enough for a guy with his skill set. If we are to get deep into the final series, he is one of the players that we should be looking at for some improvement.

Williams was the other senior player I was disappointed in. Sure he kicked a few early goals, but I was watching him closely in the third and 4th quarters. Wasn't working hard enough for my liking.
A few times when he was following his player back inside our D50, he wasn't fully invested. His brain fade at the end of the third was very costly.

All in all not a time for panic. We looked a few % off and it showed on the scoreboard. I would have liked to have seen Charlie moved up the ground to get him involved well before the move was made. TDK will be better for the experience.


Acres 3 turnovers in a row. I know what you saying about daggs. I heard Sydney Blues thoughts. I couldn't disagree. Lucky those 3 disposals didn't hurt us in the first. He ended up with 78% Def which isnt bad, especially after starting with 3 in a row,,,,kicked a good goal....18 possessions, 340 metres from 10 kicks 35 PPs 2 SI's . He's OK but done better.

RE Gov....super athlete. Great vertical leap. Can Intercept. Lazy. Soft. Injury prone. Shits me . Felt for Kemp

I think TDK is young like Kemp an still developing. He played well when ball on the ground but he needs Pittos support in the big games, otherwise a bigger ruck can work him out. Sure he will learn. But he's still developing. Ha's enjoyed a purple patch and people think that's going to last. Against his brother, that was a lifetime experience and he was'nt going to stop. Mind over matter, but in the end it killed him. If he played the next week against Nankervis fatigued he wouldve bbeen eaten alive imo. He needs a chop out....not from Cripps or Harry for me. They have important roles to play..to play what we pay them for. He hasnt played out of his skin like he did before. If anything I think he will fatigue badly as a sole ruck this year ...imo.

It is a shit atmosphere.

Lucky its small and cosy and noise echoes when they cheer...then its really quiet.

Sydney games are hilarious but getting better.....people chatting sipping chardonnay then when they hear a crowd noise they look up and if its a sydney goals they put their drink down and clap or just say "Yay Sydney". They love the slow chant Syyyyydddnnnnneeeeeyyyyyyy. Because you don't have to put your chardy down and dfont have to scream.

I wish we would have a slow Carlton call every now and them ...not after goals,,,but when we are up.

How old are your kids? If they needed clowns for a laugh I was there and then there were the clowns next to me. We wouldve created atmosphere.
Are you sydney based?

I still think we will win the flag. Last night will make us stronger.


I'm with you on the winning the flag thought. So much so i have spent the equivalent of a European holiday to buy tickets to the GF through AFL events for myself and the family. I figure it we don't make it, we will still have a great day out, stress free. Win /Win other than the ridiculous cost.

We are based in Sydney. Live in the inner west, mold free. Three kids. Little guy is 6 years old, plays Auskick under the father son rule at Wests magpies.
The two girls are 9 and 11. They are walking footy encyclopedias. Next time we are playing locally i will look you and team clowns up.

I totally agree with you about the swans games. I grew up in Sydney so have been to many swans games over the years. Fortunately I got to spend 5 or 6 years in Melbourne when Kouta was up and about dominating the league so I got to really enjoy the taste of a footy at PP and the G. I want my kids to have that experience as it wont be something they forget in a hurry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
Braithy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
2023 Cameron Cox
2022 Biclavs Stanley
2021 Gawn Jackson

Last 3 premiership teams all played 2 rucks
Obviously didn't affect their turnover game

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk



.... jeez mate you're really slow. or you just don't read. it's not so much the 2 rucks that's the problem, it's the 3 key forwards we're left with up front. too tall, slow and not enough defensive pressure.


Don't be too harsh. He's had to wait until Round 17 for us to have a loss with one ruckman, to throw out the 2 ruck scenario. It's a bloody long time to wait, sitting by the computer.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WOW and 95 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group