bluechampion wrote:
Lots of selection issues to ponder:
Cerra is an automatic in, but where does he play? The main midfield trio is Cripps, Walsh, Hewitt, and they're doing more than alright. Does he play as a high half-forward who takes his turn in the midfield rotation? Does he play as a half-back, adding attacking skills to our rebound game?
Either way, where does this leave Kennedy? He can play across most lines, but his only natural position (inside mid) is currently filled. Is he too good a player to leave out? With Cerra in, does that make him the 5th mid?
Fantasia / Durdin / Owies. We all know the small forwards have been our biggest problem so far this year. Threy don't score enough and they don't defend well enough. Have we seen enough of this combination to start thinking about changes? We don't particularly have any other small forwards to play in their place, but we could start thinking outside the box and ask Williams / Cincotta / Cerra / Walsh to play their role? Would we be robbing peter to pay paul?
Ollie Hollands - puts up ridiculous GPS numbers every week, but doesn't make a huge impact? Does he need a spell, and does Binns deserve a run in his place?
Cunningham - if fit, does he come straight back? He's got pace and skill, but his success as a half-forward is somewhat tied to Fogarty doing a lot of the dirty work (they both got picked at about the same time last season and complimented each other well), and Fog is still out.
Young v. S. Durdin - We talk about defense, and the whipping boy for a lack of defensive intent is Young. Do they give Durdin a run instead?
McGovern - straight back in? If so, at whose expense?
Williams - does he need a freshen-up? A change of position for a week? License to roam? A spell in the twos? Given all the hoo-ha about him this week, what do you do - back him in or make a change?
The Williams question is an interesting one. Not sure where I read it and who said it (I think it might have been D King). The suggestion was on the basis of "selection integrity" (and certainly considering Voss stinging comments/frustration on the poor defensive effort), Zac is one who could/should be looked at.
FWIW I tend to agree that a spell for Zac should seriously be considered, and maybe one or two other poor defensive performers.