Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 5:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 139  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 5:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
frank dardew wrote:
I havent been thrilled with the performance of Durdin and Motlop but think you are too harsh on them given their age and the number of games they have played -very much learning the caper
Still very young and I think they have shown signs that each may make it

Agree none of our small forwards have express pace and that is a problem
Owies Motlop or durdin -Durdin has more pace than the other 2

We also struggle for half forwards martin and cunningham rarely fit and JSOS has had a pretty ordinary season but doesnt help when he never stays in one position
I think thats why they want Gresham he is more a hff opportunist having said that Im not really wanting him and certainly at 700 Forget about it

Forward line needs work to grg dynergird right but also drlivery into the forward line is an issue too



I don't mean to be hard on them,. Truly. I love what they bring to the table. They have a bit of spunk.
I agree with all your post.

But the small forward role is just one part of our team's structure, but one we have been chasing since Garletta and Betts ran amok, and back in those days, 10 years ago, it wasnt the norm to have 2 smalls.

What I've been consistent with all year, is that I thought our small forwards were a huge worthy investment when we drafted them, because finally we have pace to bur again. Owies doesn't, nor does Fisher. What I have learned is they are not possessed with express speed and elusiveness great small forwards possess. I'm dismayed. After 10 years, this is what we've got and also chasing Gresham.

I have also said I am not been a fan of play 3 or 4 small forwards, let alone 2 unless they are class (like the abovementioned), but if we are trying to win games (and Im not blaming them solely for our bad trot) the we certainly shouldnt be developing first and 2nd year players in games worth 4 points, when we have developed smalls Owies and Fisher.

There's times we have played all 4 small forwards Owies Fisher and the developing Motlop and Durdin. Two is plenty.

I dont think Gresham is a huge upgrade for 600 or 700K. Its the same old carlton. Get the best.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agreed 4 of Fisher owies Motlop and Durdin too many n the one side we will be a better side too when the 3 young ones go past owies


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:55 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
frank dardew wrote:
Agreed 4 of Fisher owies Motlop and Durdin too many n the one side we will be a better side too when the 3 young ones go past owies


Yep.

and they better become weapons, and the only way is to get them super fit; meatball fit.
If they can be dangerous in the forwardline, speaking of meatballs, like Prestia, that's great.
If they can help out/ mix up things in the mid-fwd rotations, they need a couple more preseasons imo.
They are young and developing and will go past Fisher and Owies, but there's no point with over exposing them on the big stage; not for them, not for Carlton imo.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 8:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14900
frank dardew wrote:
A snippet in the Age today
Suggesting McGovern wants to stay
Kempy close to another deal :thumbsup:

Fish on the lookout for other opportunities

Not clear that Gresham necessarily wants us or he has decided to leave stkilda

:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 8:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17943
CK95 wrote:
Why would Gresham want out of St Kilda?


Because its @#$%&! St Kilda

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35660
Location: Half back flank
Fair

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2023 3:31 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 372
all this talk of small forward not necessary mots /durds still young but we should be concentrating (our recruiters) on mean. strong quick mids and mids ,just watch ess/dogs/ Adl games you see what i mean.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2023 3:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Why would Gresham want out of St Kilda?


Because its @#$%&! St Kilda


Aaron Hamill :mad: WTF ... still not over his departure

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2023 4:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
I don't want to lose TDK. I feel he will come good.

But if we lose him to money, then I'd be happy with this:

Quote:
Carlton receives: Pick 1 (West Coast), Hayden McLean (Sydney)

West Coast receives: Pick 4 (Carlton), Pick 6 (Sydney), Future 2nd Round Pick (Carlton), Pick 41 (Sydney), Pick 60 (Carlton)

Sydney receives: Tom De Koning (Carlton), Future 2nd Round Pick (West Coast), Pick 69 (Carlton)

Okay, bear with me here…

West Coast gets exactly what thy need, turning pick 1 into two top 10 picks and numerous additional assets to help their rebuild.

Sydney gets their guy in Tom De Koning, but doesn’t pay the farm given they get back what could be pick 19 or 20 in 2024.

And Carlton swings for the fences, going all-in for Harley Reid, while replacing De Koning positionally with Hayden McLean.

McLean isn’t a world-beater, but structurally would make sense inside 50 next to Charlie Curnow and Harry McKay, while Marc Pittonet carries the ruck load.

Will this happen? No. But it’s fun to think about!


Nic Negrepontis

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2023/06/23/one-fun-fake-trade-idea-for-all-18-afl-teams/

I really like Hayden McLean, and it would be nice to welcome back to Carlton the famous McLean.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 12:31 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6321
Gresham= no
Soft overrated


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 1:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
Gresham= no
Soft overrated



Like his previous game, Gresham wasn't amazing last night. Neither was Stocker.
Let them be at the Saints.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 1:48 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 372
said weeks a go no TO gresham


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 4:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7453
Location: Bendigo
B: Saad Weitering Newman*
HB: Williams Young Kemp^
C: Hollands Walsh Acres
R: Pittonet Cripps Cerra
HF: Docherty Curnow Cottrell
F: Durdin McKay Motlop

I: Kennedy Hewett

Contracted < 50 games: Binns, Boyd, Carroll, Cowan, Lemmey, Mirkov, Owies
Contracted > 50 games: Fisher, Martin

No Contract (^) < 50 games: Akuei, Cincotta, Cuningham, Durdin, Fogarty, Honey, O’Keeffe, Philp.
No Contract (*) > 50 games: Curnow, De Koning, Dow, Marchbank, McGovern, O’Brien, Plowman, Silvagni.

Kemp and Newman are priority.
Then Cincotta & O’Keeffe.
Then Silvagni… and Cuningham, if the tape holds.
Raffle the rest that aren’t going, or gone.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 6:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21399
Location: North of the border
So if you listen to all the pundits we are going to loose TDK JSOS Fisher McGovern Dow Marchbank as a minimum.
If we don't bring in established players to replace them with and rely strictly on the draft we will go even further backwards next year.

Most teams turn over at least 6 players it should be 3 from the draft and 3 trades or free agencies.
Last year we traded in one player and drafted in 4 and added one from the left overs.

It is why we have gone backwards.

If Gresham is one good tick, find another 2

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 7:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2812
Sydney Blue wrote:
So if you listen to all the pundits we are going to loose TDK JSOS Fisher McGovern Dow Marchbank as a minimum.
If we don't bring in established players to replace them with and rely strictly on the draft we will go even further backwards next year.

Most teams turn over at least 6 players it should be 3 from the draft and 3 trades or free agencies.
Last year we traded in one player and drafted in 4 and added one from the left overs.

It is why we have gone backwards.

If Gresham is one good tick, find another 2

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


McGovern is the only regular forst 22 player in that list.

We’d need a ruck, but depending on what we got in return I’d be happy to draft.

And a huge no to trading out of this years draft for 2 players, no matter how good Reid is


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 7:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
I think Marchbank and Philp certainties

Apparently on last report McGovern wants to stay
TDK more likely to go than stay

Fisher and JSOS unlikely I would have thought fisher has another 2 to go on contract so we have whip hand there
JSOS maybe not sure selectors with ruck experiment have helped him
Dow surely will go

If they all go would free up plenty of cap

If TDk leaves we would need another ruckman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2023 8:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21399
Location: North of the border
DesEnglish wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
So if you listen to all the pundits we are going to loose TDK JSOS Fisher McGovern Dow Marchbank as a minimum.
If we don't bring in established players to replace them with and rely strictly on the draft we will go even further backwards next year.

Most teams turn over at least 6 players it should be 3 from the draft and 3 trades or free agencies.
Last year we traded in one player and drafted in 4 and added one from the left overs.

It is why we have gone backwards.

If Gresham is one good tick, find another 2

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


McGovern is the only regular forst 22 player in that list.

We’d need a ruck, but depending on what we got in return I’d be happy to draft.

And a huge no to trading out of this years draft for 2 players, no matter how good Reid is
When we line up against Hawks next week we will have 3 players playing taken from our last 6 years of National draft picks.
1 is a pick 1
Another has just started to get a regular game after being injured a lot and not impressing in the 2's
Another who has shown glimpses he could be good but drops a lot of marks gives away a lot of frees and wants to leave.

25 National draft picks in 6 years for this outcome.

I would be trading out of draft on mass

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2023 10:16 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2812
Sydney Blue wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
So if you listen to all the pundits we are going to loose TDK JSOS Fisher McGovern Dow Marchbank as a minimum.
If we don't bring in established players to replace them with and rely strictly on the draft we will go even further backwards next year.

Most teams turn over at least 6 players it should be 3 from the draft and 3 trades or free agencies.
Last year we traded in one player and drafted in 4 and added one from the left overs.

It is why we have gone backwards.

If Gresham is one good tick, find another 2

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


McGovern is the only regular forst 22 player in that list.

We’d need a ruck, but depending on what we got in return I’d be happy to draft.

And a huge no to trading out of this years draft for 2 players, no matter how good Reid is
When we line up against Hawks next week we will have 3 players playing taken from our last 6 years of National draft picks.
1 is a pick 1
Another has just started to get a regular game after being injured a lot and not impressing in the 2's
Another who has shown glimpses he could be good but drops a lot of marks gives away a lot of frees and wants to leave.

25 National draft picks in 6 years for this outcome.

I would be trading out of draft on mass

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


We traded out of the first round 2 years in a row, I’d like to see us take more first round picks, not less.

Hollands and Durdin would be playing if fit.

We also have cap issues, the best way to address them is get young talent. You’re not addressing our issues with cast offs from other clubs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2023 10:37 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10471
IMO,
Players that should not be on our list in 2024 are: Ed C (retire), Philp, Honey, McGovern (trade), Fogarty.
Players that might be traded that I don’t agree with are: Dow, TDK, Fisher, JSoS.
Players that might be in trouble that I would keep are Plowman, Carroll, Cuningham, Marchbank.

That is one hell of a list and personally, depending on who wants to jump ship, I wouldn’t be making more than 6 to 7 changes.


Last edited by SurreyBlue on Sun Jun 25, 2023 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2023
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2023 10:39 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
So if you listen to all the pundits we are going to loose TDK JSOS Fisher McGovern Dow Marchbank as a minimum.
If we don't bring in established players to replace them with and rely strictly on the draft we will go even further backwards next year.

Most teams turn over at least 6 players it should be 3 from the draft and 3 trades or free agencies.
Last year we traded in one player and drafted in 4 and added one from the left overs.

It is why we have gone backwards.

If Gresham is one good tick, find another 2

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


McGovern is the only regular forst 22 player in that list.

We’d need a ruck, but depending on what we got in return I’d be happy to draft.

And a huge no to trading out of this years draft for 2 players, no matter how good Reid is
When we line up against Hawks next week we will have 3 players playing taken from our last 6 years of National draft picks.
1 is a pick 1
Another has just started to get a regular game after being injured a lot and not impressing in the 2's
Another who has shown glimpses he could be good but drops a lot of marks gives away a lot of frees and wants to leave.

25 National draft picks in 6 years for this outcome.

I would be trading out of draft on mass

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


That's what I see every time I look at how our list has been built.
Our team, like other other teams' lists are not made up from the draft.

Trading is how team's reset and climb the ladder quickly, whereas we have not shown great results from the draft.

From last year, I like Hollands and Cowan, but they are developing, and will for a few more years, just as will any draft picks this year.

What do our Brownlow, Coleman Medallists, Rising star, No 1 picks and AA's do whilst the kids develop? Play kick to kick till they retire?

We are after Finals. Whatever it takes, get some ready made players to take the field where Philp, Marchbank and Cunners have failed more than not.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2764 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 139  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group